• Ever thought it'd be cool to have your art, writing, or challenge runs featured on PokéCommunity? Click here for info - we'd love to spotlight your work!
  • Dawn, Gloria, Juliana, or Summer - which Pokémon protagonist is your favorite? Let us know by voting in our poll!
  • Welcome to PokéCommunity! Register now and join one of the best fan communities on the 'net to talk Pokémon and more! We are not affiliated with The Pokémon Company or Nintendo.
    Register

Pokemon old Gen. vs. New Gen.

AJ™

ANGRY FAIC!!!
    • 1,495
    Posts
    17
    Years
    This Picture sums it up.
    151 ftw.
    [PokeCommunity.com] Pokemon old Gen. vs. New Gen.
     
    Haha, though I'd be in the shape of those ol' Gameboy geezers, still I like that there are more Pokemon. I've been saying it since Red/Blue, we need more, to differentiate it, give us more options, and to help make it closer to our reality. After all, there aren't only 151 species of animals, I say the more the merrier, but make sure to keep them differentiated (I think for the most part, they have been)
     
    Hmm, VGcats doesn't have enough Aeris & Leo anymore. T__T
    I also preferred the older drawing style, old as approximately pre-#100 style. :0

    Anyways, without more Pokemon (and regions), the series would die, but the amount of legendaries is a cause for concern. I s'pose it's just some sort of thing meant to retain the interest of the younger and more naive fans (though I was never particularly interested in legendaries) but it seems to be creating quite a debate amongst older fans.
     
    Last edited:
    雀 said:
    Hmm, VGcats doesn't have enough Aeris & Leo anymore. T__T
    I also preferred the older drawing style, old as approximately pre-#100 style. :0

    Anyways, without more Pokemon (and regions), the series would die, but the amount of legendaries is a cause for concern. I s'pose it's just some sort of thing meant to retain the interest of the younger and more naive fans (though I was never particularly interested in legendaries) but it seems to be creating quite a fuss amongst older fans.
    Click to expand...

    Legends are just another collectable, but horrid for metagame.
     
    I must agree. Starting with Generation III they started over doing the legendary thing. I mean seriously, RSE had Groudon, Kyogre, the Regis, Rayquaza, Jirachi, and Deoxys. Thats 8 new legendaries in a game. On top of that they started making it so that the Legendaries are semi-evil 'causing disaters and mayhem all over the place. I remember when the Legendaries were just slightly better than normal and not not these massive doomsday machines. They aren't even rare or hard to catch now! Legendaries are not legends anymore. They're just plot-line battling machines to make younger players be good with out any skill. They shouldn't have added any more legends after the GSC games.
     
    lol I thought it was funny

    I don't really have a single favourite gen, I have favourites from all the gens.
     
    Scott or whoever runs vgcats has done several other awesome pokemon comics if you haven't seen them before. Also, GEN I were the best imo. The anime was killer and so was the game.

    *Image Removed Because of Content*





    There's two others, and he also started a different comic surrounding Pokemon Firered

    https://www.vgcats.com/super/?strip_id=0
     
    Last edited by a moderator:
    Well really I have no comment about that. True, if they don't stop making more Pokemon games then the series would die. But I did miss the old series. They were like the birth of the whole series. That's how Pokemon came to be. The new ones are just like an ongoing thing, and maybe sooner or later, there will be an eighth-generation! But now, just in my opinion, they should calm down a little and make Pokemon with a different game-play, like they did with Colloseum and XD.
     
    lol ive seen the TR one before. gotta love the end
     
    You must log in or register to reply here.
    Back
    Top