• Ever thought it'd be cool to have your art, writing, or challenge runs featured on PokéCommunity? Click here for info - we'd love to spotlight your work!
  • Welcome to PokéCommunity! Register now and join one of the best fan communities on the 'net to talk Pokémon and more! We are not affiliated with The Pokémon Company or Nintendo.
    Register

2nd Gen Shouldn't Missingno. be a real...

Latios&Latias381382

rofl, Mac.
    • 215
    Posts
    18
    Years
    Pokemon??? I think it should be one instead of a glitch. But if you all could tell me what you think about it. It should be a Johto Pokemon actually.
     
    Yes, I want my Pixely little friend to be real.

    i don't understand why it would be a Jhoto pokemon, though :\
     
    I have searched the web and found that missingno is accually yoshi for some strang reason.
    But never the less this is the truth. If you remove the darker colours and replace them with green and kinda squint your eyes it is without a doubt yoshi. If you would like the cheat post it here and I will post it.ASAP Please.
    Look at profile.
     
    no it shouldn't

    it shouldn't it was just a glitch that was acidently put in red and blue
    plus sometimes if u catch it it can erase your game or screw it up
     
    I think it was a beta testing Pokémon for the developers...
     
    Missingno was just a extra Pokemon spot filler that got exposed when the demo of the old man trying to catch Weedle was shown which counted as a grass patch of messed up Pokemon, then you would go to Cinnibar and surf on the far left side closest to the land which would bring out any of the wild Pokemon from the last grass patch you visited before. Missingno was a glitch that never meant to exist.

    Well, that's just my opinion.
     
    _Tracey_ said:
    I think it was a beta testing Pokémon for the developers...
    Click to expand...
    I agree, it probably was just a beta testing pokemon, unless they planned the G/S series and left it in as an extra pokemon slot to be duplicated and made into the new pokemon.
     
    It was probably a test Pokemon used to try out the battle system, like in Zelda Ocarina of Time with it's beta quest
     
    it wasnt a test pokemon it was just messed up data.. look it up on wiki.. woulda been cool to get some kinda item that clearedn up MissingNo who then looked like a pokemon
     
    Also...

    I heard that in every cartridge 255 Pokémon fit. If in R/B/Y are there 151 Pokémon...

    255 - 151 = 104 ^_^

    Maybe there are 104 different Missingno.s filling empty entries...
     
    That would be pretty stupid if it were. What type of pokemon would it be and such. The Unown are already like missingno's.
     
    What type of pokemon would it be and such.
    Click to expand...
    Its Bird/Water IIRC, but Flying would be about the same as bird, so Flying/Water.
     
    How do you figure it would be a Flying/Water type? I can see the water thing for the ealier versions, but what about the other appearances that they make on land? They don't fly.
     
    Nintendo and Gamefreak said missingno was the debug pokemon, like the template for all pokemon, which can be used for editing pokemon data. Like the debug rooms in goldeneye N64, and super mario rpg SNES, or the debug cheat for sonic the hedgehog 3.
     
    I'm wondering...

    Why don't use the "Missingno." and "Glitch" official Threads ??

    Also, they're sticky...
     
    xilef said:
    Nintendo and Gamefreak said missingno was the debug pokemon, like the template for all pokemon, which can be used for editing pokemon data. Like the debug rooms in goldeneye N64, and super mario rpg SNES, or the debug cheat for sonic the hedgehog 3.
    Click to expand...
    sounds fair enough to me. And it makes sense.

    No, MissingNo. is a missing number. It should never be a real pokemon.
     
    It really should be another Ghost type Pokemon because we need more Ghost types.

    :t093:~*!*~Queen Boo~*!*~
     
    You must log in or register to reply here.
    Back
    Top