- 33
- Posts
- 12
- Years
- Seen Jan 2, 2014
Hello all.
I joined this website last night after a close friend of mine had a somewhat upsetting experience. I later went on to have a similar (though admitedly lesser) experience.
I have developed the opinion that the moderators of this site appear to object to topics which express minority views, ideas or suggestions, or otherwise topics which are "outside the box" in any way.
Yesterday, my friend posted a thread in the advance generation topic. I can't post the link, but it's entitled how blind people play pokemon (or something similar). It was basically explaining that in spite of his disability he was able to play and compete in pokemon, though was requesting a little bit more information about the map than what he could get from a traditional walkthrough in order to ade him in traversing the maps. The thread was quickly locked stating it violated some rule; but we reviewed the rules and nothing states that you couldn't post a request for assistance in the advance generation subforum.
In this case, I believe this decision was made strictly based upon this particular mod's personal views on this topic. This person may not be interested in step counting, which is perfectly understandable, but forcing that opinion on the rest of the community by making sure nobody else could respond with offers of help or questions is really unreasonable. This could have become an informative thread about the fact that even someone without sight can still enjoy Pokemon as much as anyone else. Sadly the community was robbed of something that could have been unique and informative.
I later posted a thread in the Black and White section titled "in-game event status resetting", which was a topic about save hacking. It was also removed within ten minutes with a similar response of basically, this doesn't fit anywhere (though admitedly the response I got was somewhat more friendly, mature and intellectual than my friends). You could argue that this should have been posted in emulation (which they said it didn't really fit into anyway), but it's not because it's perfectly possible to use hacked save files on a DS.
I came to this site just thinking, "we can discuss pokemon". You quickly realize that this is actually a place for discussing a very limited selection of hand-picked, very specific aspects of Pokemon.
What's really so bad about a perfectly Pokemon related topic which just defies the status quo a bit? Sure, "Rate my Team", "Dialga or Palkia?" or "X and Y speculations" are all good, but why must we be penalized for posting something unexpected (while still remaining on the topic of the games to which the particular subforum is dedicated to)?
In closing, I hope this doesn't offend anyone, as I sertainly didn't mean to offend anyone. I just wanted to bring these matters to the attention of the community in hopes of resolution, or at least a reasonable explaination of why minority or unprecedented pokemon topics are so Tabu? Where do we benefit from obstructing conversation in this way?
I joined this website last night after a close friend of mine had a somewhat upsetting experience. I later went on to have a similar (though admitedly lesser) experience.
I have developed the opinion that the moderators of this site appear to object to topics which express minority views, ideas or suggestions, or otherwise topics which are "outside the box" in any way.
Yesterday, my friend posted a thread in the advance generation topic. I can't post the link, but it's entitled how blind people play pokemon (or something similar). It was basically explaining that in spite of his disability he was able to play and compete in pokemon, though was requesting a little bit more information about the map than what he could get from a traditional walkthrough in order to ade him in traversing the maps. The thread was quickly locked stating it violated some rule; but we reviewed the rules and nothing states that you couldn't post a request for assistance in the advance generation subforum.
In this case, I believe this decision was made strictly based upon this particular mod's personal views on this topic. This person may not be interested in step counting, which is perfectly understandable, but forcing that opinion on the rest of the community by making sure nobody else could respond with offers of help or questions is really unreasonable. This could have become an informative thread about the fact that even someone without sight can still enjoy Pokemon as much as anyone else. Sadly the community was robbed of something that could have been unique and informative.
I later posted a thread in the Black and White section titled "in-game event status resetting", which was a topic about save hacking. It was also removed within ten minutes with a similar response of basically, this doesn't fit anywhere (though admitedly the response I got was somewhat more friendly, mature and intellectual than my friends). You could argue that this should have been posted in emulation (which they said it didn't really fit into anyway), but it's not because it's perfectly possible to use hacked save files on a DS.
I came to this site just thinking, "we can discuss pokemon". You quickly realize that this is actually a place for discussing a very limited selection of hand-picked, very specific aspects of Pokemon.
What's really so bad about a perfectly Pokemon related topic which just defies the status quo a bit? Sure, "Rate my Team", "Dialga or Palkia?" or "X and Y speculations" are all good, but why must we be penalized for posting something unexpected (while still remaining on the topic of the games to which the particular subforum is dedicated to)?
In closing, I hope this doesn't offend anyone, as I sertainly didn't mean to offend anyone. I just wanted to bring these matters to the attention of the community in hopes of resolution, or at least a reasonable explaination of why minority or unprecedented pokemon topics are so Tabu? Where do we benefit from obstructing conversation in this way?