• Ever thought it'd be cool to have your art, writing, or challenge runs featured on PokéCommunity? Click here for info - we'd love to spotlight your work!
  • Our weekly protagonist poll is now up! Vote for your favorite Trading Card Game 2 protagonist in the poll by clicking here.
  • Welcome to PokéCommunity! Register now and join one of the best fan communities on the 'net to talk Pokémon and more! We are not affiliated with The Pokémon Company or Nintendo.

TinyXP / TinyVista / Tiny7

Which have you used.


  • Total voters
    15
Notice: the following is copyrighted text, reproduced here for informational purposes. This qualifies as fair use under US copyright law. The original license contents can be found here.

You may not reverse engineer, decompile, or disassemble the software. Other than that, you can hack it up pretty much however you want. Even then, that part of the license is restricted by applicable law.

[..] or disassemble the software
make more copies of the software than specified in this agreement or allowed by applicable law

Disassamble, aka rip it apart.
Make more copies, aka burn your "light weight" versions. Though I guess this one can be questioned, as thats what you do with slipstreamed service packs as well.
 





Disassamble, aka rip it apart.
Make more copies, aka burn your "light weight" versions. Though I guess this one can be questioned, as thats what you do with slipstreamed service packs as well.
Wrong. Disassemble means to put into assembly language. Google "disassembler" and you'll see I'm correct. As for "making copies," copies for personal use are allowable by law.
 
Wrong. Disassemble means to put into assembly language. Google "disassembler" and you'll see I'm correct. As for "making copies," copies for personal use are allowable by law.

I know what the Assembler language is. But as much as you want to deny it, you are still in a way disassembling the software by removing features.
 
I never tried of these, or heard of em'.

Would someone mind explaining what are these?
 


I know what the Assembler language is. But as much as you want to deny it, you are still in a way disassembling the software by removing features.


My view is that disassembly = reverse-engineering features
removing features = deleting/destroying said features
∴ removing features is fine.

In fact, law in my country enables my friends to edit copyrighted DVDs to suit their tastes as long as they don't distribute them.
 


I know what the Assembler language is. But as much as you want to deny it, you are still in a way disassembling the software by removing features.
Except you're WRONG. Disassembling software is LEGALLY defined as using a disassembler to get the assembly code. Since this is a LEGAL DOCUMENT, the LEGAL DEFINITION is applied. Also, IANAL.
 
Regardless of disassembling and removing features, I'd probably not use them. My copy of Windows 7 runs just fine on my PC, why would I want to strip it of functionality?
 
I tried TinyVista, and it actually ran better than normal vista on my craptop.

Although nothing beats Mulinux in terms of smallness...
2 MB space on the hard drive :P
 
Back
Top