FreakyLocz14
Conservative Patriot
- 3,498
- Posts
- 15
- Years
- Seen Aug 29, 2018
The RIAA, MPAA, and the cyber police: The Axis of Evil
The RIAA's reasoning why on file sharing is stealing is shoddy at best. They lose no money from it. When a CD is made, the industry must pay to have the actual disc manufactured, placed in jewel cases, and be distributed to retail outlets. Thus, shoplifting the CD from the store is stealing.
Now when that CD is ripped into a mp3 file, the industry lost no money; and neither did they lose any money when you shared it provided that you legally purchased the original CD.
The RIAA argues that they are losing potential revenue. This is a fallacious argument because it makes the unfounded assumption that you would have purchased the CD from a retail store had file sharing not have been an option. The RIAA's argument is weak because in order for it work, they would have to make ripping CDs illegal as well. Why hasn't the RIAA sued Microsoft over the ability to rip CDs simply using Windows Media Player?
Also, where were the RIAA lawsuits in the 80's and 90's when people were manually recording music from the radio onto cassette discs? Surely, they were losing potential revenue because those people didn't buy the official cassette.
Of course, all of this is blissfully ignored as politicians give them their way in order to get funding from them for their election campaigns. Money makes the world go 'round; and it also makes American law go 'round.
Discuss.
The RIAA's reasoning why on file sharing is stealing is shoddy at best. They lose no money from it. When a CD is made, the industry must pay to have the actual disc manufactured, placed in jewel cases, and be distributed to retail outlets. Thus, shoplifting the CD from the store is stealing.
Now when that CD is ripped into a mp3 file, the industry lost no money; and neither did they lose any money when you shared it provided that you legally purchased the original CD.
The RIAA argues that they are losing potential revenue. This is a fallacious argument because it makes the unfounded assumption that you would have purchased the CD from a retail store had file sharing not have been an option. The RIAA's argument is weak because in order for it work, they would have to make ripping CDs illegal as well. Why hasn't the RIAA sued Microsoft over the ability to rip CDs simply using Windows Media Player?
Also, where were the RIAA lawsuits in the 80's and 90's when people were manually recording music from the radio onto cassette discs? Surely, they were losing potential revenue because those people didn't buy the official cassette.
Of course, all of this is blissfully ignored as politicians give them their way in order to get funding from them for their election campaigns. Money makes the world go 'round; and it also makes American law go 'round.
Discuss.