• Please note that this section is for questions regarding the forum itself - it is not for fan game-related questions. If you have a question about a fan game, ask in the appropriate thread.

  • Ever thought it'd be cool to have your art, writing, or challenge runs featured on PokéCommunity? Click here for info - we'd love to spotlight your work!
  • Our weekly protagonist poll is now up! Vote for your favorite Conquest protagonist in the poll by clicking here.
  • Welcome to PokéCommunity! Register now and join one of the best fan communities on the 'net to talk Pokémon and more! We are not affiliated with The Pokémon Company or Nintendo.

Issue: Why Is This Happening?

  • 3,046
    Posts
    16
    Years
    • Seen May 11, 2016
    My signature is going haywire because it claims that a word from the CSS is censored. It keeps saying 'position': is censored. Why is that?
     
    apparently some users were abusing the position CSS element and it was censored to prevent that abuse.
     
    Well if that is the case then shouldn't the proper users have their picture in the proper place? I mean Bakura in the middle of any thread would scare people.
     
    if "position"+: is censored it will render ****'s instead thus breaking the css. so no. all users with this in there css are affected. don't use it for now.
     
    Aha that makes sense. Well whoever did abuse should take the blame cause they are ruining it for everyone it seems.
     
    For it to get censored someone must have abused the positioning to put it somewhere else besides their signature.
     
    I must admit I'd prefer to just infract the users messing around with CSS inappropriately rather than censor the whole function. Perhaps *discussing* this before censoring next time would be good... <_< The issue certainly doesn't come up very often.
     
    Thanks for completely messing up my gallery guys, background-position no longer works either. :|

    Was it honestly that big of a problem?;
    I only told one other person about using the position code and so far have only seen me and them use it.
     
    I didn't even know you could edit the signature with CSS.
     
    I must admit I'd prefer to just infract the users messing around with CSS inappropriately rather than censor the whole function.

    I have to agree with just giving out infractions to anyone who messes with CSS and ruins the pages. This whole censoring thing is just taking it a step too far.

     
    I must admit I'd prefer to just infract the users messing around with CSS inappropriately rather than censor the whole function.

    Amen. I don't use position: or background-position: much myself, but I'd rather know I can use it rather that it screwing up the whole template.

    Plus, if I hadn't of read this, I'd of thought something was wrong if I tried that.
    Not that that matters much, but still.

    I'm just glad it didn't screw with my signature or any of my templates. -.-
     
    Back
    Top