YGO: Individual Card Discussion

[Frostweaver]

Unless you aren't running...

a) theme deck that isn't earth
b) attribute deck that isn't warrior/mixes of warrior
c) decks that focus on alternative win instead of depleting life points
d) burn decks

Then your deck got a 95% chance of having the need of D. D. Assailant in pairs, or even triplets. If you need D. D. Assailant, then that means you already have a D. D. Warrior Lady in your deck (unless you are playing an earth deck).

4.9999999999999...99999....9999/5

0.0000000000000...00000....0001 mark off because it's not restricted yet. In the meantime, abuse him in threes for one more year to go head-on-head against Cyber Dragon triplets.

 

[Gokey Shuckle]

A nice card and possibly better than D.D. Warrior Lady. It's a shame that D.D. Warrior is coming out in TP7. This card truely out-ranks it. 9/10.

 

[Zaikiro]

Unless you aren't running...

a) theme deck that isn't earth
b) attribute deck that isn't warrior/mixes of warrior
c) decks that focus on alternative win instead of depleting life points
d) burn decks

Then your deck got a 95% chance of having the need of D. D. Assailant in pairs, or even triplets. If you need D. D. Assailant, then that means you already have a D. D. Warrior Lady in your deck (unless you are playing an earth deck).

4.9999999999999...99999....9999/5

0.0000000000000...00000....0001 mark off because it's not restricted yet. In the meantime, abuse him in threes for one more year to go head-on-head against Cyber Dragon triplets.

I perfer my D.D Warrior Lady only. D.D Assilant is really popular because she(yes, it is a female) is unrestricted. It's not a staple, but it will help your deck very well.
4.0/5 both formats.

A nice card and possibly better than D.D. Warrior Lady. It's a shame that D.D. Warrior is coming out in TP7. This card truely out-ranks it. 9/10.

The meta keep getting worse for everyone else with the release of D.D Warrior.

Nice to see you here.

 

[Frostweaver]

If one day D. D. Warrior becomes easier to get, let's switch one D. D. Assailant with D. D. Warrior. Hey, who doesn't like to get under Messenger of Peace to remove the Fire Princess, or Stealth Bird/Des Koala?

Sheesh... one of these days we're going to see another new subtype coming out of the warrior decktype:

Warrior+Messenger of Peace abuse, featuring Don Zaloog and his best friend D. D. Warrior (and few other blah blahs that I can't think of in 4 sec) >>;

 

[Zaikiro]

Bascially D.D Warrior will get more play due because of your reasons and also since it's searchable by Sagan and Giant Rat.

 

[Frostweaver]

And it's another boost for Reinforcements of the Army.


Warrioir gets all the fun... ._.

 

[Zaikiro]

And it's another boost for Reinforcements of the Army.


Warrioir gets all the fun... ._.

Sad.. when BLS get's banned, they cheered up his warrior comrades by giving more support. <__<

 

[Frostweaver]

While we're on the warrior topic, let's talk about EVEN MORE support.

Warrior Lady of the Wasteland (4 star, warrior, 1100/1200)

When this card is destroyed and sent to the Graveyard as a result of battle, you can Special Summon 1 EARTH Warrior-Type monster with an ATK of 1500 or less in face-up Attack Position from your Deck. Then shuffle your Deck.


Right off the bat, Giant Rat vs. Warrior Lady of the Wasteland. Anyone want to comment? I'll comment tomorrow as I need to do math homework now...

 

[Zaikiro]

It's effect is "too" sepific. Does let you select which mode to summon the monster though. The best it could get is it's self, Elxlied Force and Mystic Swords man Lv.2

I give it a 4.1/5 (both formats)for warrior decks since it can search for D.D Warrior also which is comming out soon.

It's a good card, just a watered down version of one, but better at the same time.

 

[Forci Stikane]

Does let you select which mode to summon the monster though.

When this card is destroyed and sent to the Graveyard as a result of battle, you can Special Summon 1 EARTH Warrior-Type monster with an ATK of 1500 or less in face-up Attack Position from your Deck. Then shuffle your Deck.

*Quoted in bold for emphasis*

 

[Zaikiro]

*Quoted in bold for emphasis*

It's still a good card even though it's has to be in atack. I guess I made a mistake.

 

[Mullet]

It's still a good card even though it's has to be in atack. I guess I made a mistake.

This card ph4ils. Giant rat is better. Why would you use this when you could just use Giant Rat.:\

 

[Zaikiro]

This card ph4ils. Giant rat is better. Why would you use this when you could just use Giant Rat.:\

Many people have reasons to, but there is not much of a reason to.

 

[Mullet]

Many people have reasons to, but there is not much of a reason to.

Well that's dumb, rat can search out any Earth monster, not just Warriors.:\

 

[Frostweaver]

This card ph4ils. Giant rat is better. Why would you use this when you could just use Giant Rat.:\

I only see a reason to use this over Giant Rat is if...

a) If you're an extreme feminist
b) If you want a complete warrior deck.
c) If you need warriors in the graveyard for whatever tech cards you got.
d) If you want to deck out faster. Reinforcements of the Army can bring out the searcher, but Giant Rat doesn't have this one card deck-thin advantage.

When D. D. Warrior becomes more common, I want to see what can come out of a "lower than 1500 warrior" deck.

 

[Zaikiro]

I only see a reason to use this over Giant Rat is if...

a) If you're an extreme feminist
b) If you want a complete warrior deck.
c) If you need warriors in the graveyard for whatever tech cards you got.
d) If you want to deck out faster. Reinforcements of the Army can bring out the searcher, but Giant Rat doesn't have this one card deck-thin advantage.

When D. D. Warrior becomes more common, I want to see what can come out of a "lower than 1500 warrior" deck.

That is true, it's mostly the type of the monster is, and it can thin it's self, so can Giant Rat. And is reuseable by Warrior Returning Alive.

 

[Forci Stikane]

I only see a reason to use this over Giant Rat is if...

a) If you're an extreme feminist
b) If you want a complete warrior deck.
c) If you need warriors in the graveyard for whatever tech cards you got.
d) If you want to deck out faster. Reinforcements of the Army can bring out the searcher, but Giant Rat doesn't have this one card deck-thin advantage.

When D. D. Warrior becomes more common, I want to see what can come out of a "lower than 1500 warrior" deck.

...If you make that "1500 AND lower", then you can already make the deck:

Monsters: 16

3x Marauding Captain
3x Don Zaloog
2x Mataza the Zapper
1x DD Warrior Lady
1x Sangan
1x Magician of Faith
1x Cyber Jar
1x Mystic Swordsman LV2
1x Exiled Force
2x Command Knight

Spells: 18
1x Dark Hole
1x Heavy Storm
1x MST
1x Snatch Steal
2x RotA
2x A Warrior Returning Alive
2x The A Forces
2x Smashing Ground
1x Swords of Revealing Light
2x Enemy Controller
1x Premature Burial
1x United We Stand
1x Mage Power

Traps: 6
1x Call of the Haunted
1x Torrential Tribute
2x Sakuretsu Armor
2x Bottomless Trap Hole

...Of course, this is all off the top of my head. I might have missed something...

 

[Zaikiro]

...If you make that "1500 AND lower", then you can already make the deck:

...Of course, this is all off the top of my head. I might have missed something...

That's how most decks I make.

Mabye 1 The A Forces. Mabye add Mystic Sowrdsman Lv.4 and take out Don. You could try the Slient Sowrdsman family, but I know the point of this deck.

 

[Forci Stikane]

That's how most decks I make.

Mabye 1 The A Forces. Mabye add Mystic Sowrdsman Lv.4 and take out Don. You could try the Slient Sowrdsman family, but I know the point of this deck.

Problem: Mystic LV4 is 1900 ATK, which is over 1500.

The A. Forces goes better in more copies.

 

[Zaikiro]

Problem: Mystic LV4 is 1900 ATK, which is over 1500.

The A. Forces goes better in more copies.

It does not really look like that with all the power up's. The A. Forces would work better if it was a field card.