I'm sorry. How am I being a hypocrite? I have not said one thing and done the opposite of what I said. What Fake argument have I used? Gamefreak themselves have told us before that they STARTED a project some short years before its release. There is proof that they don't start many years before the game comes to light. Can you find proof that they started the remakes at the same time as Pokemon Ruby/Sapphire or Diamond/Pearl? I mean real proof and not some opinion that you can cook up using minuscule unrelated findings within the games. Junichi said that they started Black and White two years before it was released which was a year or two after Diamond and Pearl.
I was referring to your previous post. You said that there was purpose for restart in gen 3 (special attack and special defense split). After I proved it's fake argument, you started saying there was no purpose for that restart, just to oppose to my argument about forcing people to buy remakes. Isn't that being hypocrite?
I can't prove anything officially, but think about it. What a nasty "coincidence" is that they blocked trading to R/S and after only 14 months they released FR/LG - first remakes ever, necessary to catch most of gens' 1 and 2 Pokemon. At the time of producing R/S, they must have plans for FR/LG and Emerald. They obviously saved story of Rayquaza and Battle Frontier to be used in Emerald. So, it they planned Emerald, they must have planned FR/LG as well because those games were released earlier than Emerald.
You said it in your last post, Gen 5 reset everything you can't assume there won't be a restart. And yes I did answer you because they DIDN'T cut the transfer to Gen 5 from 3. You have to do it one Generation game back. You can still transfer from Gen 3 to Gen 5 through Gen 4. We don't know if there will be a transfer ability in Generation 6. We know nothing about Generation 6. We won't know anything about Generation 6 for another two years at the least.
Gen 5 doesn't reset one thing - trading from previous generations. That supports my theory that they will never make trading reset again, because there are too many Pokemon now to do that, therefore R/S remakes never will be needed. Imo R/S remakes will be done to render Hoenn into modern engine, not for trading purposes.
You still didn't answer my question about why they made impossible to trade DIRECTLY from gen 3 to 5. That one simple question. My answer is they did that to make R/S/E look outdated and make R/S remakes in gen 5. What's you answer?
Unova is more resembling Kanto as a Solid region with a few out of the way islands that don't play part in the story as opposed to Hoenn that about half water routes. A severe lack of Water Routes in Unova makes it seem closer to Sinnoh in that design. Others have argued against your viewed opinions on the similarities. You are the only one that sees those similarities.
Am I the only one to see return of dive system into Pokemon games? Or desert routes? That's simply not true.
I never said Hoenn's and Unova's overall designs are similar because they aren't. Anyway, lack of water routes in Unova can work as opposition to large water routes in Hoenn. To keep regions of gen 5 balanced in amount of water (assuming Hoenn will be remade in gen 5).