Recent content by Emuscles

LF: Minun/Plusle 1x Master Ball Misc. Items TMs Vacuum Wave Shadow Ball Focus Punch Low Kick Berries Tamato Qualot Pomeg OF: Drifblim, bred w/ Toxic, Substitute & Hypnosis (learns Baton Pass) Starters (All) TMs HG Legendaries Misc. Pokerus .. Berries Kelpsy Grepa Hondew

LF: GROUDON MANAPHY OF: TMs EV training ? I need these.

LF: Groudon Mudkip Master Ball Sword Dance Focus Punch Stone Edge OF: Mewtwo Drifblim (w/ Substitute, Hypnosis & Toxic) Any stater (except Mudkip) Items/TMs ..Or, just ask Edit: Also, I need, Tamato, Qualot and Pomeg berries. And, I can offer Grepa, Hondew and Kelpsy berries.

what is 'flawless' in terms of IVs? i know how to breed 31's in two stats, but 31 in every stat is nearly impossible without some sort of exploit.

OF: Mewtwo LF: .. not Mewtwo.

yea, that's cool. even if it weren't, can you even tell (other than unrealistic IVs)? edit: and why does it say you're 11? lol!

dude, you can't outright state that exploiting is not cheating, and expect anyone to respect your opinion. no offense, but you aren't arguing the term according to its definition, and especially the context. i came into this thread stating an opinion, but after i saw the sort of responses i've...

Whether or not its cheating is most definitely debatable. We were discussing the fact that its an exploit. Whether or not exploiting is cheating, is also debatable.

bro, i was just playing devil's advocate. RNG is an art form.. ..of cheating. bhahaha. ;D

Wait for it.. .. .. .. .. U MAD?

Excuse me? I think you need to brush up on your comprehension skills. Regardless of whatever you were nit-picking-- all that I meant was: The designer intended for it to be truly random, but was unable to do so. Therefore it is exploitable, against the spirit of the game. Its sad that I...

It is a design flaw, and its hard to avoid-- if the designer had any way to make it 'truly' random, he would have. Maybe you should shut up, because you're wrong. It isn't easy; I think the first trial would be finding the information on your own.

'Only in 2010 the first truly random computational number generator was produced, recurring to principles of quantum physics.' Its a limitation, therefore an unavoidable design flaw, meant not to be exploited-- and designed as random, for a reason.

Its a design flaw. Are you kidding me?

If you could read, you would see it clearly is what I've mentioned. I could break it down for you if you need help.