Our software update is now concluded. You will need to reset your password to log in. In order to do this, you will have to click "Log in" in the top right corner and then "Forgot your password?".
Welcome to PokéCommunity! Register now and join one of the best fan communities on the 'net to talk Pokémon and more! We are not affiliated with The Pokémon Company or Nintendo.
Yet another court case: No statutory duty lies to apply for, or to possess a driver license for personal travel and transportation as defendant is not within the class of persons for whose benefit or protection the statute was enacted." Routh v. Quinn, 20 Cal 2d 488
I don't wish to cause controversy. This stuff is really in the Bible. Again, I have nothing against one for believing a religion. The issue is when people don't understand the details involved and how its used to create wars. People should be able to worship peacefully (I saw a pic of Christians...
No trolling intended. I don't have time to spew random bulls*it over the internet that isn't factual. I came to inform about the law based on the information I've found that supports my logic and claim. Thank you darkredwing for understanding what I'm saying. Although I don't agree with the...
Why would God send Moses to slaughter men, women and children? They spared the virgins and raped them. What about slavery? I have a hard time believing a book that was written numerous times by humans and the fact that King James had sex with his mom. There are many religions that say the same...
I've proved it with Marbury v Madison, it is repugnant of law because its a direct violation of your Right to travel. Police powers "...adopt such laws and regulations as tend to prevent the comission of fraud and crime, and secure generally the comfort, safety, morals, health and prosperity of...
The courts have obviously proved my points numerous times, not only in lower court cases, but Supreme Court cases as well. Even Marbury v Madison proves my point with "an act of the legislature repugnant to the constitution is void." http://www.oyez.org/cases/1792-1850/1803/1803_0 Also, note...
What could be clearer then Thompson v Smith 154 SE 579- "The right of the citizen to travel upon the public highways and to transport his property thereon, either by carriage or by automobile, is not a mere privilege which a city may prohibit or permit at will, but a common law right which he...
I don't understand why people base their beliefs off of a 2000 year old book that's been rewritten multiple times. No one in America is a real Christian because if they were, they would own slaves and be for abortion and kill children. If they want to believe a fictitious book, that's their...
But you're ignoring the fact that I've proved by point with Supreme Court cases and in the case of ObamaCare (just like car insurance), a government cannot require you to purchase a service if you do not wish to have/use it. ObamaCare, just like car insurance is a service that one may partake...
You saying that the citizen cannot ignore an unconstitutional law is illogical. Here's an example why. The recent gun registration thats been going on in multiple states is unconstitutional. The Right SHALL NOT be infringed. It's obvious that registration leads to confiscation. So basically what...
It doesn't break your leg nor picks your pockets if Phil believes something based off a book full of fictional characters and stories. If that's what he believes then that's his business and if he wishes to express it, that's his right.