View Single Post
Old July 6th, 2013 (12:55 PM). Edited July 6th, 2013 by Dakotah.
Dakotah's Avatar
Dakotah Dakotah is offline
    Join Date: Aug 2010
    Posts: 903
    Originally Posted by TRIFORCE89 View Post
    Meaning, if the Democrats proposed it it'd be a wonderfully thoughtful idea.
    It'd be a bad proposal regardless who proposed it. A bad idea doesn't suddenly become right when it's proposed by someone else.

    Originally Posted by TRIFORCE89 View Post
    Some may close down in the short term, yes. That's unfortunate. But wouldn't others open up later who meet the criteria? It's not like all clinics go away forever.
    No, they wouldn't, because the same problem that those clinics faced would stop a new clinic from opening. Many hospitals do not want to grant admitting privileges to doctors who perform abortions, and so any clinic that attempts to open will be prohibited from doing so. Also, if you look at abortion clinics that have shut down, you'll discover that new ones rarely, if ever, replace them. That is because governments in the U.S. are making it so difficult to do so. Here's another interesting titbit of information, if, as the governments say, instituting laws such as this would improve patient care by making it safer for women to have an abortion, why then do they not do the same for cosmetic surgeons running their own clinics? There is a double standard going on here. Plain and simple, the goal of laws such as these is to shut down abortion providers, effectively making the state abortion-free.

    Of course, we all know that just because you make it difficult to have an abortion, doesn't mean they won't be done. And many more women will be having them, and some wont survive.
    Personal Website
    YouTube Channel

    Normal Safari
    Lillipup / Audino / Ditto

    "...many of the truths we cling to depend greatly on our own point of view." ~ Obi Wan Kenobi
    Reply With Quote