Oryx
CoquettishCat
- 13,183
- Posts
- 14
- Years
- Age 32
- Seen Jan 30, 2015
This is inspired by, but not necessarily a discussion of, a recent ruling in Michigan (that twocows unwittingly brought to my attention thx bby).
This got me thinking about the educational systems in place in general - for example, in Highland Park, Michigan, the site of this school district, the median income is a little over $19,000 a year (this barely scrapes past the poverty line until the family is at least 3 members, then it is a poverty-level income). America's worst school districts often coincide with the poorest, which means our alternatives - private schools - are out of reach of the people that truly need to move outside the public system. The state of New York tries to circumvent this problem with charter schools, but they often have hyper-competitive application processes (or random application processes) and require an involved parent both willing and able to do the research necessary and take the time to work out how to apply and how the family can make it work when the school isn't down the street. If the parents are undereducated or working too many hours or uninvolved in their child's life, that solution doesn't work well either.
Do you guys think that there's a way to reform the public education system to allow for all students to get a roughly equal education, or do you even think it needs reform? Do you think charter and private schools are the answer, or shouldn't exist at all?
A 2-1 decision reversed an earlier circuit court ruling that there is a "broad compelling state interest in the provision of an education to all children." The appellate court said the state has no constitutional requirement to ensure schoolchildren actually learn fundamental skills such as reading — but rather is obligated only to establish and finance a public education system, regardless of quality. Waving off decades of historic judicial impact on educational reform, the majority opinion also contends that "judges are not equipped to decide educational policy."
This got me thinking about the educational systems in place in general - for example, in Highland Park, Michigan, the site of this school district, the median income is a little over $19,000 a year (this barely scrapes past the poverty line until the family is at least 3 members, then it is a poverty-level income). America's worst school districts often coincide with the poorest, which means our alternatives - private schools - are out of reach of the people that truly need to move outside the public system. The state of New York tries to circumvent this problem with charter schools, but they often have hyper-competitive application processes (or random application processes) and require an involved parent both willing and able to do the research necessary and take the time to work out how to apply and how the family can make it work when the school isn't down the street. If the parents are undereducated or working too many hours or uninvolved in their child's life, that solution doesn't work well either.
Do you guys think that there's a way to reform the public education system to allow for all students to get a roughly equal education, or do you even think it needs reform? Do you think charter and private schools are the answer, or shouldn't exist at all?