»» February Daily Chit-Chat

[jammi567]

I think they're on equal terms, as the queen can shut the country down if she wanted to.

 

[Fox♠]

Ok, comparing George Bush's regime to the Nazi regime is a little over the top. Granted, the Bush administration started the Iraq war for unjust reasons, but Saddam's regime still needed to be overthrown. If you're going to compare anyone to the Nazis, it should be Saddam and his government. They were the ones killing innocent people by the thousands. =\

Saddam has being out of office in Iraq for over a year now, yet Bush is requesting MORE troops are sent in. There's also the amazing fact no other country is allowed nuclear defense missiles, like N.Korea for instance, they weren't any real threat, but they've being forced to shut down all their nuclear testing facilities under the threat of war with the USA.

Saddam and Bush are both control freaks, they both share attributes with Adolf Hitler.

 

[Chibi-chan]

Now Blair is pulling out; good for all you Brits! D: I wish we could pull out too...the statistics they list are so inflated...Yes, there are about two million armed forces in the U.S...this includes those who go to the Naval Academy whom require four years of service no matter what, those who recieve military scolarships, those who go to West Point, and those who are just there to help for other reasons. Only 400,000 troops of those 2 million are actually tried for hand to hand and destructive combat. Out of those, how many is he sending to Iraq? It's kinda sad, really. We're going to run out soon...

About Saddam...isn't it weird how he was killing the same people that we're still fighting and killing? Yes, Saddam killed Shiites. He was a Suni. (If you don't know the difference, then you don't know what the hell this war's been about.) We're killing them still for 9/11. So...is there really a big difference when they were both after the same group? Honestly, I think it was more of a hype to ignore our failed destructive weapon search. Meh...

 

[Fox♠]

Blair's not as bad as Bush, Blair is just an idiot who does pretty much whatever America asks him to =/

However, when we were bombed, he flew straight back from the world conference thing to be with his people, I think he at least deserves a little respect.

 

[MegaFuz]

Saddam has being out of office in Iraq for over a year now, yet Bush is requesting MORE troops are sent in. There's also the amazing fact no other country is allowed nuclear defense missiles, like N.Korea for instance, they weren't any real threat, but they've being forced to shut down all their nuclear testing facilities under the threat of war with the USA.

Saddam and Bush are both control freaks, they both share attributes with Adolf Hitler.

So because Saddam is out of power we should just evacuate Iraq and let them self-destruct themselves? Just because Saddam is technically out of power doesn't mean his influence is gone too. He still has a plethora of supporters that will try their hardest to take over the country, and if that were to happen all the lives lost and money spent would go to waste. I understand Bush and his administration have made far too many mistakes in this war, but pulling out now would result in complete and utter chaos.

I'd agree on the fact that Bush has control issues, but I still believe comparing him to Saddam & Hitler is plain wrong. They are two of the worst men to have ever walked the Earth. Bush has made some fatal errors in decision making, but I would never compare him to those heathens.

 

[Warheart]

I won't get involved in this too deeply, but going back to the initial invasion, I believe Bush began with good intentions, and alot of the mistakes that people will try to pin on him came from his administration.

But after a while, the news just gets really old...y'know, like, enough-is-enough; It feels like everyone here at this point accomplished what they had set themselfs up for, so why send more people in? There may be influences from Saddam, but the whole idea behind the invasion was to "pull a tyrant out from power," not to infultrate, destroy, and rebuild a country all together based on another single mans preference

 

[MegaFuz]

I won't get involved in this too deeply, but going back to the initial invasion, I believe Bush began with good intentions, and alot of the mistakes that people will try to pin on him came from his administration.

But after a while, the news just gets really old...y'know, like, enough-is-enough; It feels like everyone here at this point accomplished what they had set themselfs up for, so why send more people in? There may be influences from Saddam, but the whole idea behind the invasion was to "pull a tyrant out from power," not to infultrate, destroy, and rebuild a country all together based on another single mans preference

Actually, the main reason for infiltration was not to yank a tyrant from power. That was an advantage on the side, but the main reason the war was started was because the government "thought they had weapons of mass destruction". Course, many believe the main reason was to gain control of the oil resources in Iraq, but that's pretty much all speculation. Speculation that is well deserved, I suppose, considering there were no WMD found. =\

 

[Fox♠]

Britain's main reason was to remove Saddam from power, Blair constantly mentions it.

 

[Chibi-chan]

Here's something I bet some of you wouldn't expect from me, an apology, in my two months away I started to see the world from a better perspective, and realised just how mean I have being to some of you, I was an elitist and a bully, and for that I am truly sorry, I'm not asking for forgiveness, merely trying to build some bridges.

Hope y'all doing well, sorry again

Matt~

Oh, how long has this been up here? Huhu, honestly I don't think you've been an elitest, and probably more yip-yappy than a bully. Or, from my perspective that is. How thoughtful though, Drummershuff :3

 

[MegaFuz]

Britain's main reason was to remove Saddam from power, Blair constantly mentions it.

Might have been his and Britain's main reason, but Bush and the US openly stated in the early stages of the war that their main reason was because Iraq was considered a threat (WMD). Of course, they're not going to be very vocal about that now, seeing as they didn't find any mass weapons.

I have no problem with Britain pulling their troops from Iraq because this wasn't really their war to start with. I don't really understand the logic in it though. If the main objective was getting Saddam and his regime out of power, that should go hand in hand with instating a new, solid government. Like I said earlier, just because Saddam himself is gone, doesn't mean his influence is gone. His supporters are just licking their chops at the idea of troops leaving, waiting for their chance to take over again.

Oh, how long has this been up here? Huhu, honestly I don't think you've been an elitest, and probably more yip-yappy than a bully. Or, from my perspective that is. How thoughtful though, Drummershuff :3

Umm...that isn't Drummershuff. =X

 

[Chibi-chan]

Might have been his and Britain's main reason, but Bush and the US openly stated in the early stages of the war that their main reason was because Iraq was considered a threat (WMD). Of course, they're not going to be very vocal about that now, seeing as they didn't find any mass weapons.

I have no problem with Britain pulling their troops from Iraq because this wasn't really their war to start with. I don't really understand the logic in it though. If the main objective was getting Saddam and his regime out of power, that should go hand in hand with instating a new, solid government. Like I said earlier, just because Saddam himself is gone, doesn't mean his influence is gone. His supporters are just licking their chops at the idea of troops leaving, waiting for their chance to take over again.



Umm...that isn't Drummershuff. =X

Then what other Matt is thar that would have a reason to say such? ;<

 

[Drummershuff]

LOL. I can't believe you thought that was me. Thanks for you opinion of me though. And I'm sure any moderator would be glad to confirm that that account has a different IP than one of mine.

Then what other Matt is thar that would have a reason to say such? ;<

What reason would -I- have? I don't have any regrets about how I've acted on this forum. Everything I've done has made me realise what I needed to change, and I've done so. I certainly would never make an apology of that sort.

 

[Beatrice]

Then what other Matt is thar that would have a reason to say such? ;<

I told you assuming would make an arse out of you and me. damn replica

Still, which Matt is Kaku talking about? Obviously this would give no more than an assumption that it was from you, if anyone bothers to read signatures in the first place. The reason you were thought of was not because you had something to apologize for but because I couldn't think of any other Matt.

 

[Drummershuff]

Kaku is talking about himself. It seems pretty obvious that his name is Matt, hmm?

And by saying thank you for the apology means that you thought it was needed in some sort of way... or so I see it.

 

[Beatrice]

Kaku is talking about himself. It seems pretty obvious that his name is Matt, hmm?

And by saying thank you for the apology means that you thought it was needed in some sort of way... or so I see it.

I haven't even really noticed him actually being a member since...this month to be exactly. I don't even see him being the slightest bit elitist. Just a Brit who likes guns alot.

 

[Chibi-chan]

I haven't even really noticed him actually being a member since...this month to be exactly. I don't even see him being the slightest bit elitist. Just a Brit who likes guns alot.

You're reminding me of Jack now. I hateunowkthx. D:
Nya, Simon logged in this year I think....hm...

 

[Drummershuff]

Hmm, if you haven't seem him around I guess that could be why you would question it. Although, it appears at the beginning of his signature it says "you wouldn't expect from me," so therefore one would assume the signature was talking about the member that had it in their signature.

 

[Beatrice]

Hmm, if you haven't seem him around I guess that could be why you would question it. Although, it appears at the beginning of his signature it says "you wouldn't expect from me," so therefore one would assume the signature was talking about the member that had it in their signature.

Or he quoted a PM, which I originally thought myself and just forgot to put the 'quotes' on.

 

[MegaFuz]

It was pretty clear to me, but what do I know, right? XD

 

[Chibi-chan]

It was pretty clear to me, but what do I know, right? XD

Nya! I was confuzzled because I didn't even know his name was Matt! Matt is such a common name! Someone should call themeselves Matthew to avoid confusion.
But Saber's just stupid so he wouldn't get in anyway :\