• Please note that this section is for questions regarding the forum itself - it is not for fan game-related questions. If you have a question about a fan game, ask in the appropriate thread.

  • Ever thought it'd be cool to have your art, writing, or challenge runs featured on PokéCommunity? Click here for info - we'd love to spotlight your work!
  • Our weekly protagonist poll is now up! Vote for your favorite Conquest protagonist in the poll by clicking here.
  • Welcome to PokéCommunity! Register now and join one of the best fan communities on the 'net to talk Pokémon and more! We are not affiliated with The Pokémon Company or Nintendo.

25charlimit

Well, I am pretty interesting. :D

Anyway, there should be no reason for complaint when you can just write a full sentence.

"Just write a full sentence," would've worked, so it's not hard.
I believe the argument is more about the way this place is moderated in regards to the character limit rule than it is about posters' copious laziness.

I assume the point of this thread is that you'd like the rule modified? "This rule doesn't apply if the moderator of the section feels as though the post contributes regardless of length." or something of that nature? Given the response from the two admins who've replied here, my guess is that you won't have much support of that.
Adding that line to the rules would be good; though I take it unless I am an admin myself my support towards IIMarckus won't matter...
 
I believe the argument is more about the way this place is moderated in regards to the character limit rule than it is about posters' copious laziness.

Well, I don't see a problem with how the moderation is done. You just have to avoid it by writing a full sentence.
 
Yes, I see what you're saying. You think that moderators should let certain posts that are under the 25 character limit go, so long as the post is worthwhile enough to ignore it.
You're almost there. I think that in a case like this, where I did not try to get around the filter in any way, and received no indication from the filter that this would be warn‐ or caution‐worthy, no warning should be given.

Relaxing the rule for good posts in general, though a good idea IMO, is not what I'm debating here.
 
You're almost there. I think that in a case like this, where I did not try to get around the filter in any way, and received no indication from the filter that this would be warn‐ or caution‐worthy, no warning should be given.
Ah, now then that would be something to have a word with Semele about, in PMs.
 
Ah, now then that would be something to have a word with Semele about, in PM.
That's reasonable.

Another thing I would appreciate is either fixing the filtering in regards to BBcode, or providing some indication (whether in the rules or elsewhere) that BBcode may interfere with the filter.
 
Back
Top