• Please note that this section is for questions regarding the forum itself - it is not for fan game-related questions. If you have a question about a fan game, ask in the appropriate thread.

  • Our friends from the Johto Times are hosting a favorite Pokémon poll - and we'd love for you to participate! Click here for information on how to vote for your favorites!
  • Dawn, Serena, Hilda, Wes - which Pokémon protagonist is your favorite? Let us know by voting in our poll!
  • Welcome to PokéCommunity! Register now and join one of the best fan communities on the 'net to talk Pokémon and more! We are not affiliated with The Pokémon Company or Nintendo.

All Of a Sudden, Too Big

Status
Not open for further replies.

Patrick

Ya'll Are Weird
  • 540
    Posts
    12
    Years
    I haven't really changed my signature since I've been here, save for the middle image, and up until now it's been fine. Now I've got that annoying orange message for some reason.

    So, what's up with that? Forum rules change over the weekend or something? I just wanna make sure, because it could be more clear.
     
    too wide - combined width exceeds 600px limit

    Your signature exceeded the limit for signatures which is:

    Signatures cannot exceed 350 pixels in height total.
    Signatures are exactly that: signatures. They're simply used for better identification of the poster and a form of expression on a forum. They do not need to take up anymore space than the content of your post. Signatures larger than 350 pixels in height are larger than they need to be. This includes blank space, text, images, and CSS.

    Signatures cannot exceed 600 pixels in width.
    The total width of a signature cannot exceed 600 pixels in width. Images stretch the forum for smaller styles, and 600 pixels is the point where some of our smaller width styles and smaller screen resolutions start to break the HTML tables if something is too large in the post content. Text is permitted to exceed the 600px width limit.

    CSS can not exceed 600 pixels in width.
    We need to clarify that while CSS can be fluid, a signature doesn't need to take up that much space and doesn't need to be that wide. While it may not hold the risk of stretching the forum, it defeats much of the purpose of a signature to have it larger than the width of signatures. In saying that, CSS is included in the 600px width limit.

    Variable widths in CSS are not allowed.
    In addition to the above, and to simplify CSS for everyone -- sorry CSS-wizzes -- CSS width in percentages is not permitted. It should be noted that all staff members have the ability to view the code in your signature, and if it's found to have a width% value, it will be disabled.

    The combined size of any content in your signature may not exceed 1 megabyte.
    Some of the users browsing the forum have slower internet speeds, so it takes longer for them to load pages than those who have faster connections. One of the many contributing aspects of loading a web page is loading images, and large file sizes heavily impact the load time of a webpage. Large file sizes for images are most commonly seen in large, animated .gif images. Your signature images may not exceed 1 megabyte in file size.


    You may not have had the signature disabled until now because a mod may have just noticed it, but just simply resize it to an appropriate size and you will be good :]
     
    Like Jelli said, it is probably just the case that nobody spotted it.

    From what I can see, the signature beneath all the warning doesn't exceed 600px in width, it is instead too tall 485px instead of 350px.

    So basically, no idea what happened here! :) Fix it up and remove the warning tags and you're good to go. Check your dimensions in paint or use the 'inspect element' tool of chrome by right clicking.
     
    From what I can see, the signature beneath all the warning doesn't exceed 600px in width, it is instead too tall 485px instead of 350px.
    Actually, it could also be because when people align their images together side-by-side, it gets wrapped inside the disable tag, with the images being too wide, thus making them stack atop each other and not side-to-side, if that makes sense.
     
    Actually, it could also be because when people align their images together side-by-side, it gets wrapped inside the disable tag, with the images being too wide, thus making them stack atop each other and not side-to-side, if that makes sense.

    Ah, very true.

    If you need your new signature checked, dbp, we have a thread for that.
     
    Rather than do a lot of guesswork, I just got rid of the "presenting gallery" gifs. A bit lame considering how long they've been there, it was sort of my thing (and I was finally gonna switch 'em out for new ones, too).

    But what can you do? It is what it is. Ya'll can lock the thread now if you want.
     
    Status
    Not open for further replies.
    Back
    Top