Battle frontier

Character Name: Coza
Clauses: Sleep, Species, Item except for Leftovers.
Prize (optional): Regular Lv.1/Egg Grass type starter.
FC: 5370 8250 3598
Rules: I may use one uber, challenger may not. (Can make one uber each)
Type: Grass Gym
 
Didn't know there were positions open?? *facepalm* there goes that I can use an uber you can't rule again.
 
Character Name: Code_Green or CoGre
Clauses: sleep, no uber, OHKO, evasion, species, no hax.
Prize (optional): Ummmmmmm.... I'l get back on that.
FC: 1462 0122 9619
Rules: OU 5 vs 5 (until further notice.) double battle (optional).
Type: Rock/ground

Am I in?
pleaaaaaaase?
XD just kidding.
 
Last edited:
Arceus, you should really change your OP or your thread will eventually look like SPAM with all the pointless gym requests.
 
we have grass open because crimson quit and rock is open too
 
Ok code APPROVED THANKS

The coza n o not approved I do not like the rule of one uber gym but ont challenger sorry

Yeah greene i sortive will

Rock is now gone i hop[e ill find a grass soon :(
 
Arceus10000 said:
Ok code APPROVED THANKS

The coza n o not approved I do not like the rule of one uber gym but ont challenger sorry

Yeah greene i sortive will

Rock is now gone i hop[e ill find a grass soon :(
Click to expand...

Character Name: Coza
Clauses: Sleep, Species, Item except for Leftovers.
Prize (optional): Regular Lv.1/Egg Grass type starter.
FC: 5370 8250 3598
Rules: One Uber Each. (Better?)
Type: Grass Gym
 
can you change the rule one last time? sorry. uh, Prize: Pikachu Colored Pichu Rules: 5. vs. 5. best 2 out of 3.
ty in advance. oh yea, and gym is open again.
 
Character Name:Marlon
Clauses:sleep
Prize (optional):Syther male or female or jolteon flareon or evee
FC:0087-8515-3419
Rules:no all pokemon can't be level 100 or 90
Type:psychc except the last two ;)
if not can i be a E4 you still need a psychc E4 like in platinum dimond and pearl
 
Sorry to tell you this but the position is taken by me already and your rules sound a bit wierd, if your battling over wi-fi, everyone's pokemon is either lvl 50 or 100
 
@ Tori, how can you do best two out of three? First of all, techy stuff aside, to do best out of 3 you need 3 not 5 Pokemon, and secondly there is no way to do that in-game.

@ MunchlaxMan, Marlon hasn't Wi-Fi'ed before from what I understand.
 
Greene1516 said:
@ Tori, how can you do best two out of three? First of all, techy stuff aside, to do best out of 3 you need 3 not 5 Pokemon, and secondly there is no way to do that in-game.

@ MunchlaxMan, Marlon hasn't Wi-Fi'ed before from what I understand.
Click to expand...

I think he means more then one battle. =/
 
Gamer2020 said:
I think he means more then one battle. =/
Click to expand...

If that is the case then I retract my challenge as not only is it unfair for any challenger to have to beat a leader twice where he will no doubt have a better chance second time around, but will also be extremely *yawn* boring having to face the same person twice in a row. I have to say I am disappointed as this league showed promise after getting set-up but now it seems half of the leaders are so spineless that they have to try and make rules to give themselves a clear advantage, something not seen on any other league.
 
yea guys i actually agree with grene here cmon im sure u r all good battlers so prove it
 
Constructive Criticism - Comments serving to improve or advance; providing a helpful critical judgment expressed with knowledge.

I am putting this here because I can already tell what's going to happen. Greene is providing constructive criticism and it not bashing you in any way, shape, or form (this is all an assumption, because I have a feeling someone will complain about the criticism).

Keep in mind, I completely agree with Greene. When I was a leader here, we were all generally fair with our rules. Lately, things such as "only the leader can use ubers" or the one stated above, best 3 out of 5 has ruined any respect this league had attained. It gives advantages to one side or the other.

For those of you who are thinking "Well this is just a challenging league. There's nothing unfair about it. If you can't take it, then you're not up to the challenge."

Fair - Without irregularity or unevenness

(I like using definitions to improve my points. xP) Unevenness is the key word. By creating the unbalance of allowing ubers on one side and not the other, you are giving yourself a clear advantage over the opposition. It makes the league unfair, not challenging.
 
well arent u the little nerd >.< and for your constructive criticism look at the first page and all the leaders rules as im sure at least 3 of them have to be fair
 
yeah i agree as much as the rest of you, Arceus should really check the forms roughly before deciding to add any more leaders or if the leaders have unique rules, we should test challenge to find out if it would be fair or not
 
Arceus,
i agree with green 100 percent

Green,
you clearly are smarter and more coordinated than other people on this site but the way i see it your constantly bashing the league for no reason, are you even a chalenger?

By the way Green i have no intention of insulting you im just curious...

And by the way arceus, my SN is matt262626
on this site and the site you made you put matt2626
thankyou

And aero i fully agree with you as wel
im just curious.
 
Last edited:
We are not bashing. It's constructive criticism. I was part of this league earlier, but relinquished my role because I was falling out of the pokemon scene. I'm saying what I am because I see that this league is quickly dying and usually that calls for change.

Therefore, myself and Greene want to explain to the leaders here why the activity probably isn't so great. So we suggested what we saw based of our knowledge of both battle experience and the more recent challengers' behaviors.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top