• Our software update is now concluded. You will need to reset your password to log in. In order to do this, you will have to click "Log in" in the top right corner and then "Forgot your password?".
  • Welcome to PokéCommunity! Register now and join one of the best fan communities on the 'net to talk Pokémon and more! We are not affiliated with The Pokémon Company or Nintendo.

Bradley Manning Verdict - Discuss?

FreakyLocz14

Conservative Patriot
3,498
Posts
14
Years
  • Seen Aug 29, 2018
It's sad that he will still serve a lengthly prison term, but this ruling will set a promising precedent on what constitutes treason, and whistleblowing isn't it.
 
2,138
Posts
11
Years
The video is not very analytically or objective by any means. It fails to take into account both the precedent that would have been set by unilateral decisions by leakers who have no representational authority to do so as well as the negative affects of stirring domestic and foreign unrest for taking classified information.

Here's a brief summary from good ol' wikipedia that helps demonstrate the psychological issues that this man was facing. Further lends itself as to why those without authority should not be able to make unilateral decisions. This man was erratic and tormented by psychological illness. We cannot allow anyone, especially those with such cognitive ailments, exhibiting both an identity crisis as well as violent behavior, to make decisions that affect both the nation and the international community.
Spoiler:



Further, every military has produced collateral damage. It's an unavoidable product of war. By stirring up instances of collateral damage for the public and the world to see it invigorates terrorist activity and creates tension with allied nations, in which enables for a more peaceful international presence. This type of material is used as the platform for terrorist enlistment into regions outside of Afghanistan/Iraq, into areas like Libya, Tunisa, Egypt, Sudan, Yemen, just to name a few that are ravaged by political unrest aggravated by the presence of terrorist organizations. He went to his commander to make a complaint, though he never exercised the option of going to a Congressional Oversight Committee. Releasing information to the public as well as terrorist organizations is a reckless remedy to the issue at hand. He clearly was not in the right state of mind to have made a decision that weighed the costs and benefits to his decision.

So, not only were his actions not thought out with a clear mind and illegal by U.S. statutes, his actions were also detrimental to US Foreign Policy as well as International Foreign Policy abroad in respect to the Middle East, given the spread of terrorism into other regions of which most likely wouldn't have accessed information so readily without the leaks. This mobilization of information has been a catalyst for the Arab Spring, which has created a radical and violent approach to reform, that has caused more chaos than actual positive reforms that they were seeking, and has aggravated the Palestinian/Israeli Conflict, as well as the Palestinian domestic conflict between the Fatah and Hamas. Let me address the Arab Spring as well. Many have lauded the Arab Spring as a sign that democracy will arise in the Middle East, when in actuality Islamists have been domineering in the election over Secularists. Again, it's nothing against Islam, I would be opposed to Christianists enforcing laws in the US, Secularism in sovereign nations improves both domestic issues as well as domestic ones - we have all observed the only official Theocracy, Iran, and the negative impact upon the global climate. Secondly, the Arab Spring, if initiated by the observances of the Wiki-leaks, is extremely concerning given the negative sentiments that the citizens have against he United States and its allies. This is what is most threatening to international peace as it relates to the Arab Spring.

For these reasons, this man should be behind bars for reasons other than his actions merely being illegal as it relates to US statutes. The simple one-dimensional approach of the pundit should be discredited on several accounts.
 
14,092
Posts
14
Years
For whatever reason, I empathize more with Manning than I do Snowden. Whistle-blowers don't retreat overseas to hide in hostile nations who would have something to gain from revealed classified intelligence, in Snowden's case.
 
2,138
Posts
11
Years
For whatever reason, I empathize more with Manning than I do Snowden. Whistle-blowers don't retreat overseas to hide in hostile nations who would have something to gain from revealed classified intelligence, in Snowden's case.

This is a good point. Snowden appears to be more level-headed and calculated with his actions as well. Manning should not have had access to all that information given his history of psychological instability and interpersonal conflicts with his subordinates. Those in command should bear some of the responsibility for allowing him such clearance. He clearly was acting out, not for personal gain, but in some sort of behavioral frustration. That could be a factor in sentencing. Perhaps his mental ailments are sufficient mitigating factors to have him lodged in a mental facility in order to treat him, confine him for the number of years he would have otherwise spent in prison, and still keep a precedent that affirms strict punishment for the leaking of classified information and violation of Federal Laws.
 
14,092
Posts
14
Years
Going by that ^

Let's also remember that Manning exposed some war crimes committed by U.S. soldiers in Iraq, If I recall correctly. Whereas Snowden "leaked" details about a decade-old spying program that we actually already knew about. Manning didn't bolt to Russia, either.
 
Back
Top