linkinpark187
Computer Tech
- 617
- Posts
- 18
- Years
- Age 38
- Randolph, VT
- Seen Dec 6, 2022
I personally like Nvidia more than I do ATI, but that's just my preference. I would recommend that instead of going with a 9800 you go with one of the 200 series cards, they are much more efficient as the architecture is better built than that of the 9 series, and is still in the same price range as the 9800. I would also suggest this processor, so long as money is not a big constraint: https://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16819103656&Tpk=Phenom II X4 925
I just got that myself, and the amount of performance increase from my Phenom II x4 940 (my 940 was a 3.0GHz, but also AM2+, the one I'm suggesting is AM3). I like using Lost Planet: Colonies for benchmarking (not completely, though), and with this processor I noticed a 15-20 fps increase. It was incredible! So, if you're going to be doing any gaming, I would recommend a quad core because there are many games that utilize multi-core CPU's.
And I'm going to agree with Archer and twocows here. Don't go with Corsair. I myself would recommend either G.Skill or Crucial, but Kingston is another good, trustworthy brand. :D
I just got that myself, and the amount of performance increase from my Phenom II x4 940 (my 940 was a 3.0GHz, but also AM2+, the one I'm suggesting is AM3). I like using Lost Planet: Colonies for benchmarking (not completely, though), and with this processor I noticed a 15-20 fps increase. It was incredible! So, if you're going to be doing any gaming, I would recommend a quad core because there are many games that utilize multi-core CPU's.
And I'm going to agree with Archer and twocows here. Don't go with Corsair. I myself would recommend either G.Skill or Crucial, but Kingston is another good, trustworthy brand. :D