• Ever thought it'd be cool to have your art, writing, or challenge runs featured on PokéCommunity? Click here for info - we'd love to spotlight your work!
  • Dawn, Gloria, Juliana, or Summer - which Pokémon protagonist is your favorite? Let us know by voting in our poll!
  • Welcome to PokéCommunity! Register now and join one of the best fan communities on the 'net to talk Pokémon and more! We are not affiliated with The Pokémon Company or Nintendo.

Capital Punishment

Is Capital Punishment right or wrong?

  • A capital idea!

    Votes: 7 29.2%
  • No way. It's wrong.

    Votes: 11 45.8%
  • Not sure...

    Votes: 4 16.7%
  • Other(please say what)

    Votes: 2 8.3%

  • Total voters
    24
In British prison, one of our most notorious peadophiles has a PS3, Wii and cable. He gets x mas dinner and access to sport facilities.

Josef Fritzl is in a "prison" where he gets his own cell, television and can play tennis whenever he wants.

Prison is a cop out, the only solution to deal with these scum is death.

Well I don't agree with them being luxurious in jail, but that doesn't make the death penalty a better solution.

We don't need to kill people, we just need to make sure that prison is prison and not comfortable for them.
 
If you go the commandment route (not just "the ten" but every "thou shalt" and "thou shalt not") in the Bible... then the commandments seriously contradict each other. First we're told not to kill. Then we're told to murder witches and people who drink the blood of animals. Anyone who has ever eaten a medium rare steak has probably tasted the blood of an animal.

I'm against capital punishment. It's just a free ticket out of prison for life. Do you think those seriel killers want to continue living knowing that they're going to be spending the rest of their days locked away from the world? Of course they don't. When they're on deathrow they probably count down the days until they die. Sure, it may scare some people who hear about the people on deathrow from commiting the crimes... but what does it really teach the person who's going to die? Nothing. Because they die before they can learn their lesson- or, sadly, after they learned their lesson and have actually changed.

Personally, I think letting them rot would do better as punishment than giving them a free ticket out.

Also, since when is prison like a hotel? My father was in prison for years when I was young. It wasn't no hotel for him. He didn't have no phone. Or Christmas dinners. He could only watch TV once a week. That doesn't sound like a hotel to me...? British prisons must go easy on their criminals. Because, last I checked, in America prisoners have to earn their rights to so much as a TV. And, if you've ever watched that movie about the Crip founder that's on deathrow... you'll know that it ain't easy. Or a hotel.
 
Also, since when is prison like a hotel? My father was in prison for years when I was young. It wasn't no hotel for him. He didn't have no phone. Or Christmas dinners. He could only watch TV once a week. That doesn't sound like a hotel to me...? British prisons must go easy on their criminals. Because, last I checked, in America prisoners have to earn their rights to so much as a TV. And, if you've ever watched that movie about the Crip founder that's on deathrow... you'll know that it ain't easy. Or a hotel.

And therein lies the problem :D

Britain is the nation of bending over backwards and its really not helpful when it comes to crime and such.
 
I hate to be a polemicist, but is that in the New Testament? Because in the Old Testament God also tells the Jewish People to exterminate all of their neighboring countries, since those races might contaminate the practices of the chosen people. There aren't many people who still agree with that now, bar Ann Coulter.

Anyway, that idea, and the equally questionable one you are referring to, is part of the Mosaic Covenant, which Paul said doesn't apply to non-Jewish Christian converts (he was writing this when the people converting to Christianity were either Jews or pagan gentiles). And since "Christ is the end of the Law", this stuff doesn't apply to Christians.

I believe that the most important thing Jesus ever said ordid that is recorded in the Christian Canon is his command to "love you enemies". When you are at one with that which you don't identify with (your enemies), you yourself experience an expansion of your own consciousness. The concept of justice works to counter this under-valued concept.

So, on that basis, I disagree with what your argument.

Exactly. It makes for a very poor argument when people try to use Religion to justify the Death Setence.

Similarly, I strongly disagree with the Death Penalty on the basis that not all killers/criminals intend to act the way that they do. And, if you start to introduce clauses into which killers/criminals get killed, what remains in the way to stop a government from seriously abusing this position and start picking off its critics?

Also, as someone else already mentioned, the fact that these criminals are separated from their families, their friends and their old lifestyle (even if you want to argue they're actually better off in prison, which I seriously doubt) is surely a lot of suffering, which can only be impounded by them then having to live with the guilt of what they've done. They must be psychologically assessed at frequent intervals.

Additionally, what good does killing these people actually do? Seriously. You just add another death to the tally. And, introduce suffering to another group of people. Say some guy killed a random, young child. That child's family, friends and community will probably mourn them. The suffering is truly immense. Then, if the death penalty existed, the guy is executed. Doesn't it occur to supporters of the death penalty that, say, the father of the killer won't have had anything to do with it? Or the mother? Or the siblings? Or his friends? Or his community? By killing that man, all you is make other people suffer whilst another life is wasted. I don't really see how that is any better...
 
If only the circumstances is right, like if it's for a person or group who has committed some against humanity.
 
In British prison, one of our most notorious peadophiles has a PS3, Wii and cable. He gets x mas dinner and access to sport facilities.

Josef Fritzl is in a "prison" where he gets his own cell, television and can play tennis whenever he wants.

Tennis and Wii, as much as it sounds like it, aren't the only things you need to make your life happy. The guards aren't very friendly, often, the food isn't very good. Most importantly, those people are locked inside for a very, very long time. They can't do what they want to do, they can't meet who they want to meet, they have no power whatsoever over their own lives. They have to deal with violence and insults every day, they have to deal with guilt... Also, I read that pedophiles get the worst treatment from their fellow prisoners, and they are sometimes even murdered in the prison because the other criminals hate them so much (at least that's the case in Finland. I don't know about the rest of the world, though). If you were to lock those people there without even a book to read or something, without any positive social encounters and nothing to take their mind off things, they wouldn't take very long to go totally nuts.
Also, I think that kind of total isolation is used as a means of torture somewhere. I don't know for sure, though. Does someone know?

Yeah, though I actually understand your point quite well. Some prisoners seem to enjoy their lives there, which kind of isn't the point. It makes me annoyed, too, to hear that for example, prison food in Finland costs more per serving than school lunches (we have free school lunches in Finland. They're not very good, but they're something). But, I want to note, that not a single person is actually evil. There are many cases in which a murderer or a torturer was a good parent to their children or something of the like. Those people are still people and they have some good characteristics. The bad things they've done can't counter all their good points. If someone murders a person, they don't instantly become these evil things that should be locked in a room with no windows and nothing to do. They're still human. Therefore, they have to be treated like a human.

That's my opinion, at least.

Starom said:
Additionally, what good does killing these people actually do? Seriously. You just add another death to the tally. And, introduce suffering to another group of people. Say some guy killed a random, young child. That child's family, friends and community will probably mourn them. The suffering is truly immense. Then, if the death penalty existed, the guy is executed. Doesn't it occur to supporters of the death penalty that, say, the father of the killer won't have had anything to do with it? Or the mother? Or the siblings? Or his friends? Or his community? By killing that man, all you is make other people suffer whilst another life is wasted. I don't really see how that is any better...

Exactly. I didn't think of that, but it also adds to what I'm trying to say here. You should never forget that those people don't cease to be people even if they did something horrible. They still have families, they still want to be free and have a clean conscience. They don't instantly become some kind of cruel, horrible, inhumane things that should be just sweeped away. Also, I don't think many people commit murder just out of spite. Often, there's some kind of motive behind it. Who know, maybe it would be better to help the people who commit crime instead of putting them in inhumane jails and making it even worse?

In a certain Finnish prison, they did some kind of test. The prison bought domestic animals like goats and cows for the prisoners to take care. After the criminals got to take care of the animals, they became more gentle, more happy and also recieved better results in psychological tests. No-one hurt the animals or anything during the trial time, so they got to stay.
According to the psychological tests, their likelihood of committing more crimes after they got out got lower. I don't know how trustworthy those tests are, but based on this, I think I really like the idea of happy prisoners.
 
Last edited:
Eh... Capital Punishment I don't allow in some situations (Like in school, where if you, I dunno, chew gum in class, you shouldn't get a spanking for it (I swear to god if anyone were to hold a pattle to me and not be my parents, I'll take it from you and you'll feel what it's like, only on your face. Harder than usual, too).

So many people today do stuff (like hurt others) and ignore the threat of redemption.
If you get hit, and you hit them back, suddenly YOU'RE the bad guy?
BS.

Capital Punishment should only be used to increase punishment for true deeds of maleviolence (lulz it had a space).
 
Last edited:
I do not believe in capital punishment personally. I believe in redemption etc. Personally in my opinion, if we worked harder then we want to. We could rehabilitate prisoners properly rather then keep them in prisons where they have nasty shower scenes
 
It honestly depends on what the situation is. I think that sometimes it is nessecary to rid the world of someone so destructive that they would destroy many lives for little reason whatsoever. However, those running mainly on malevolence should be sent to prison for life without perol.
 
The thing about capital punishment that I don't get is that when someone is sentenced to death, it takes like 15-20 years for them to exhaust all their appeals, and then they get executed. They should change the sentence to "15-20 years in prison and then death".

Sometimes innocent people go to jail. :\

I don't like the idea of a justice system based on revenge. I'd rather it be based on reform, or at least keeping bad people away from the general public. Plus, executions are retardedly expensive. I'm fine without capital punishment.
 
I think it's right, mostly because of my religion(Christianity).
So I assume you support abortion?
I, as a devout Catholic(which few people know is a Christian faith), believe ALL killing is wrong. Corporal Punishment is just as bad as murder. Hate, anger, and sadness cause most if not all murders. Death sentence is caused by the same thing, angry, sad people related to the victim in some way.
According to my religion, God has sanctioned certain people with the right to execute others for high crimes(murder, etc) without committing a sin.
[citation needed]
 
Hate, anger, and sadness cause most if not all murders. Death sentence is caused by the same thing, angry, sad people related to the victim in some way.

Excuse me, but what the HELL are you talking about?! A LOT of murders occur because people were just in the wrong place at the wrong time. Take for example a mugging that goes wrong.

The death sentence is retribution. People pay for their crimes. And what more befitting punishment than the death of said murderer?

Also, not many people do actually die per year. Last year, there were 36 executions. Now compare that to the number of people being sentenced to death row. Yeah. Exactly. Also, it takes at least 10 years for a person to GET executed. They have to exhaust EVERY means necessary to try to prove their innocence. Also, that is also the reason why having a person sentenced to death is more expensive than jailing for 25-life. ALSO, for a deterrent punishment method to be effective, it must be swift and blind. If that were the case, there would be less murders.

Also, I don't understand why my post was deleted. It expressed a valid point in a tough subject.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top