c_dog said:
first of all the real lie is when you say you give credit where its due, while giving charizard zero credit.
which is what's due. there is something that does what it does better, and pokemon does not allow for multiple roles. Typhlosion and Blaziken are better Blaze abusers than Charizard, Salamence is a better physical and mixed sweeper.
salamence is statistically superior than charizard, but charizard has decent enough stats and enough variety in its movepool to be just as useful as salamence.
actually, it doesn't. it almost the EXACT SAME MOVEPOOL AS SALAMENCE, AND WORSE STATS ALL AROUND, WORSE TYPING, AND A WORSE ABILITY. THAT =/= AS USEFUL.
charizard@lefties [adament/jolly]
252att, 252speed, 6hp
-DD
-Earthquake
-Rockslide/Hp Fly
-Overheat
Salamence says hi and does that better.
charizard@salac [adament/jolly]
252att, 252speed, 6hp
-sub/Overheat
-bellydrum
-earthquake
-Hp fly/rockslide
pokemon say hi and hit it and ruin the plan, as Charizard is too frail to do something like this.
charizard@salac [modest]
252sp.att, 252speed, 6hp
-endure/sub
-flamethrower
-HP Grass/HP Ice
-dragon claw
Typhlosion and Blaziken say hi and do this better as Typhlo has Thunderpunch and Blaziken has STABed Sky Uppercut and more Sp.atk, and both have an Earthquake weakness which makes getting to 1 HP easier.
being relatively unused, its movesets can go from being the "standard" DD set, or it can be something totally different.
Salamence, which has about the exact same movepool with better stats, can too.
i don't think its fair to judge charizard just by the fact that its an inferior DD dancer than mence when it can obviously do more than just DD.
and suck worse at it than other pokemon?
this is why i disagree with you when you say mence makes charizard look bad, because it doesn't. charizard is still a good pokemon in his own right.
it's average. it is easy to kill and is outdone by other pokemon in all respects.
my favorite charizard is the special zard with endure, which is something that's probably never been seen by anyone. its biggest advantage is that people always expect it to be the standard DD zard and it being a special totally messes them up.
until bliss comes in and says hi :/
depending on which moves you use it can OHKO or 2HKO most pokemon, and after endure+salac, flamethrower ensures OHKO of almost any pokemon that are neutral to it.
wait, you can't 2HKO anything with that moveset, as even caterpie tackle would kill it.
suicune says hi.
this zard is also quite the swampert/dragon slayer depending the makeup of your team. if you have a swampert problem, sending out zard lures out swampert everytime to take flamethrowers, and hp grass finishes it. it works everytime.
did you ever stop and think as to WHY everything uses HP Grass? Swampert's so badass that it altered what Fire and Electric pokemon use as standard.
if you have dragon/salamence problems, charizard's also great for it. the standard DD salamence gets outrun by charizard if you've given it max speed(its the truth the non-CB mence gets outrun).
you mean like it won't die because you neglected it's poor defenses?
I go with the grass set because my teams don't have mence problems and it's fun to lure out swamps and give them a nice surprise.
see above.
Anyway, i get a feeling i'm not convincing enough just by typing all this... my name on netbattle is "AsH OwnZed j00" or something like that(not sure where the caps go)... you'll know it when you see it. i'm usually on the smogon server. let me know your netbattle name and we can battle sometime.
meh, I don't like seeking out n00bs.
hopefully i can change your mind about charizard because it's really quite useful.
despite EVERY TIME I have ran into a Charizard I laughed at it, told the guys about it, got them to laugh at it, and then killed it soon afterwards with minimal damage?
i tend to stay away from OU's with movesets set in stone.. they're predictable and people know them too well.
everyone knows what Heracross does. they often can't do **** about it anyway.
Using BL-UU pokemon works to your advantage sometimes because while they may be statistically weaker they are much more unpredictable.
except that if you don't suck you have an idea of their stats and standard moveset, but anyway...
salamence does have a lot more physical attack so it's a superior DD than zard. zard does have the belly drum alternative going for him though, and with salac that zard is arguably just as good.
BUT you must avoid getting hit somehow.
and charizard has slightly worse sp.att but with STAB in flamethrower, and enough sp.att to use dragon claw and hidden power effectively. though, i guess mence is just as effective having STAB dragon claw instead of *insert fire attack*.. i hardly see any special mence but i guess they're just as good as the special zard.. but zard does have blaze going for it.
Salamence has Intimidate, 135 Base attack'd Brick Breaks, and better typing.
in terms of mixed sweeping, charizard although having inferior stats can use stab overheat which can make it at least comparable to mence.
then you still have to consider Charizard's shitty attack.
the standard mence likes to set up DD, what can i say? when my charizard faces a standard mence it almost always DD on the first turn.
what a good Salamence does is run in and hit something until it's late game, and then proceed to DD and sweep the remainder of the team.
i mean it's smart for the mence to DD really, i mean who would expect the charizard to actually stay instead of switching to a rock slider or icebeamer? so the switch is the perfect opportunity to set up DD(i mean, it's not like charizard has ANYTHING to take out salamence right?).
nnnnnnnnnnnothing.
i think even you would use DD, despite your claim that you would use rockslide.
my Salamence doesn't ahve Dragon Dance :/
you just can't predict that charizard had dragon claw.
if Charizard could OHKO Mence with it.
Charizard cannot Choice Band, take physical hits on switch ins **** well, sweep after 2 DDs, and only have one predictable weakness.
every time I have run into a Salamene, it forced me to predict, switch, and hope it doesn't kill me.
charizard can DD and sweep after 2 DD, just not as good as salamence.
MAKING IT WORSE THAN SALAMENCE.
but like i said before, it can do so effectively enough so that they're two of charizard's many possible movesets, making it a far more unpredictable pokemon than salamence.
but its flaws make it far more easier to deal with.
how unpredictable is salamence? it's either a DD or CB. heck, this coming from a guy who got called out by A.Coz for using roar on my salamence instead of fireblast.. :S
but can you do much about it? not really. who cares how predictable it is if it does way too much for you to do **** about it.
:S is a stupid smile anyway. what's the S stand for? I'm a
Stupid idiot?
intimidate is huge. but all rest you say is meh. most water types carry ice beam with them you know.
Swampert might, but lacks the stats to make OHKO Sp.atk unaffordable, Vaporeon is a Hazer, BPer, and Wisher, so Ice Beam would often take up too much room, Suicune doesn't have the room for it, Blastoise is a utility pokemon, so it doesn't have the room for Ice Beam. the rest of the water pokemon are UU.
and most electric types come with bolt team, so meh.
except that swampert laughs at Boltbeaming things.
but yes intimidate is probably what separates salamence from charizard; that and his advantage in having lots more attack.
and more HP, Defense, Speed, Special attack, Special defense, and same speed, but anyway...
this and the fact that charizard has blaze is why i like my charizard as a special sweepert(no need for att stat, blaze to use it to its full capability).
as I said before, Typhlosion and Blaziken does that **** better than Charizard.
anyway, see you on netbattle.
as I said, I don't seek out n00bs.