leafgreen386
Custom User Title. Wow.
- 188
- Posts
- 19
- Years
- Seen Feb 9, 2006
OK. Unpredictablility. So what? Suicune says hi with its free CM.
25 char limit sucks. die limit dieHam said:everyone knows what Heracross does. they often can't do **** about it anyway.
I can kill Cross easily. Just use Espy's speed to kill it. Cross is slow. Or use Flare/Blaze as a better salac sweeper.
if Charizard could OHKO Mence with it.
It doesn't need an OHKO. All it needs is a 2HKO because Mence will DD first.
UmbreonShadow said:With the right evs, I'm sure it does. Nicpert also helps as Protect helps the healing process.
As far as Heat Wave vs. Flamethrower, Heat Wave only slightly has 2vs2 usefulness. I mean your trading 10% acc. for only 5% more power? At least trade 15% acc. for 25% in using Fire Blast.
Anyways, this is pointless. Salamence > Charizard. Period. No getting around that. You experience things from your battles that may make Charizard seem as good as sala, but that's just you. It's well-known every where of the fact that Sala > Char.
c_dog said:well, charizard is a sentimental favorite of mine so that's why i use it. i could care less if kingdra can beat charizard(it's water vs. fire so it better win), but charizard does have its uses. the good thing about special zards are that people ALWAYS expect that DD one and so the special zard makes for a very nice surprise. if i were to use physical i like the bellyzard better anyway. charizard is weak, so if you're good enough to time a DD you might as well time a sub and then belly drum and then sweep. but like i said, i find special zard to be the most useful for my team's purposes anyway.
Ham said:the good thing about charizard is that it makes Salamence look even better.
UmbreonShadow said:I've seen modest Char, and yes, swampy survives.
Either way this is pointless;
First you say Char > Sala. Easily proven wrong
then you say Char = Sala. I commend your effort, but still no.
So now your trying to take some middle ground and say we should give Char more credit.
Make up your mind if u will.
And how de we go from "Dragon Claw is overrated" to "Charizard vs. Salamence" anyway?
c_dog said:charizard > mence in versatility, and has the ability to beat it one on one,
Drayano said:If Salamence doesn't have as much of a movepool as Charizard, explain how Salamence has 4 sets that work well, yet Charizard has only 1 or 2?
Drayano said:Salamence IS easily better than Charizard though.
If Salamence doesn't have as much of a movepool as Charizard, explain how Salamence has 4 sets that work well, yet Charizard has only 1 or 2?
c_dog said:charizard has only 1 or 2? are you serious?? i just listed 3 of the basic ones. DD, belly, special, and each set has many alternatives as the DD set and belly set charizards
can come in the form of pure physical zard or they can be combo sweeperts with overheat. that's more like 5 sets instead of the 1 or 2 sets.
you obviously know zilch about zard.
yes the standard zard only has one set(DD set), but if you're actually creative and a good trainer, the possibilities are quite endless,
eventhough i find the big 3 to be the most effective, with special set as my favorite.
and salamence is the one with only 1 or two sets. it's usually DD or CB. all of its alternatives are also charizard's alternatives. charizard > mence in versatility.
I was just pointing out a common example of something that would make your Endure-zard to flee or die. What came to mind first was Suicune, that's all.oh and suicine should say hi to charizard.. heck it's a water type, a freaking water legend. i'll be ****ed if charizard can take down suicine. there are plenty of pokemon on the team who can cover suicine, pointing out suicine > charizard doesn't make charizard any less of a pokemon.