- 28,130
- Posts
- 15
- Years
- Age 30
- he / him
- Florida
- Seen yesterday
https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2019/03/the-eu-votes-on-a-confusing-new-copyright-law-tuesday/
This is pretty damning for user-created content that appears on the internet. I'm not going to dive much into the political aspect of this, but these laws are essentially vague to the point where many content-hosting companies may now have to impose filters on their uploaders to the point in which content deemed unoriginal to the slightest extent could be removed. This includes memes to sites like Reddit and imgur, videos to YouTube, and even potentially streams on Twitch.
You may also recall that these measures were going around as the EU looking to ban memes. And that's pretty much it. Take a screenshot from a TV show, caption it with meme-like text, and boom it could be deemed as copyright violation.
EDIT: After chatting with someone on Discord about the law, it's more or less catered to content hosts, so my earlier interpretation was off. Pretty much for sites like YouTube to host content to the audience (EU), they would have to either be more "vigilant" in what is uploaded (like unlawful song covers that could be deemed copyright), thus the filters to prevent that sort of stuff from going live on the website just to be within the bounds of the law.
This is pretty damning for user-created content that appears on the internet. I'm not going to dive much into the political aspect of this, but these laws are essentially vague to the point where many content-hosting companies may now have to impose filters on their uploaders to the point in which content deemed unoriginal to the slightest extent could be removed. This includes memes to sites like Reddit and imgur, videos to YouTube, and even potentially streams on Twitch.
You may also recall that these measures were going around as the EU looking to ban memes. And that's pretty much it. Take a screenshot from a TV show, caption it with meme-like text, and boom it could be deemed as copyright violation.
EDIT: After chatting with someone on Discord about the law, it's more or less catered to content hosts, so my earlier interpretation was off. Pretty much for sites like YouTube to host content to the audience (EU), they would have to either be more "vigilant" in what is uploaded (like unlawful song covers that could be deemed copyright), thus the filters to prevent that sort of stuff from going live on the website just to be within the bounds of the law.
Last edited: