Gymnotide
8377 | Scorpaeniform
- 3,596
- Posts
- 17
- Years
- Age 32
- New York City
- Seen May 22, 2016
Okay, okay. You got me there that my comment was slightly off-the-line. However, the problem that I perceive is that a third of the people claiming to have a crush on a Pokemon are trying to fit in, another third doesn't understand that a "crush" is above the standards of platonic love - i.e. one may claim love to a certain Pokemon merely for the reason that it is their favorite, etc. without thoroughly analyzing the prospects of having both a mental and physical relationship with said Pokemon; and the other third are legitimately claiming such things.
The attraction to Pokemon is analogous to bestiality and for the reason that this forum is intended to be family safe, I will not discuss the morals and societal code / physical issues, such as zoonosis, behind this.
An analogy would be if someone was "attracted" to Growlithe. What if their dog in real life were similar looking to the Pokemon? Would you be willing to develop a physical relationship with the dog? In my opinion, many people aren't considering the plausibility behind their whimsical declarations.
What it seems is that this claimed love is based solely off of Pokemon appearances, as no Pokemon has a set personality - something that sets these imaginary creatures apart from human beings. What I don't understand is how one can become attracted to a certain Pokemon through these appearances alone - after all, they are only cartoon designs; it's okay to like a design, but I don't think it warrants non-platonic love for an entire species.
To those who are legitimately attracted to Pokemon, i.e. animals, it's a matter of society. If you feel it is right, and there is indication that the animal is not in any way harmed or in discomfort from the relationship, then fine. Your call, anyway.
Just leave me out of it.
Used lightly to describe "one who likes Pokemon," or on a more serious level to mean "one who is sexually attracted to Pokemon."
The attraction to Pokemon is analogous to bestiality and for the reason that this forum is intended to be family safe, I will not discuss the morals and societal code / physical issues, such as zoonosis, behind this.
An analogy would be if someone was "attracted" to Growlithe. What if their dog in real life were similar looking to the Pokemon? Would you be willing to develop a physical relationship with the dog? In my opinion, many people aren't considering the plausibility behind their whimsical declarations.
What it seems is that this claimed love is based solely off of Pokemon appearances, as no Pokemon has a set personality - something that sets these imaginary creatures apart from human beings. What I don't understand is how one can become attracted to a certain Pokemon through these appearances alone - after all, they are only cartoon designs; it's okay to like a design, but I don't think it warrants non-platonic love for an entire species.
To those who are legitimately attracted to Pokemon, i.e. animals, it's a matter of society. If you feel it is right, and there is indication that the animal is not in any way harmed or in discomfort from the relationship, then fine. Your call, anyway.
Just leave me out of it.
Errr... Sorry... But whats "Pokephiliacs"?
Used lightly to describe "one who likes Pokemon," or on a more serious level to mean "one who is sexually attracted to Pokemon."