• Our friends from the Johto Times are hosting a favorite Pokémon poll - and we'd love for you to participate! Click here for information on how to vote for your favorites!
  • Welcome to PokéCommunity! Register now and join one of the best fan communities on the 'net to talk Pokémon and more! We are not affiliated with The Pokémon Company or Nintendo.
    Register

final fantisy

how good will it be?

  • same

    Votes: 2 14.3%

  • better

    Votes: 3 21.4%

  • worst

    Votes: 5 35.7%

  • not know

    Votes: 4 28.6%
  • Total voters
    14
LittleFascistPanties16 said:
Far worst. Final Fantasy VII wouldn't even go past midgar.

BTW: You spelled Fantasy wrong.
Click to expand...

lol, he spelled lots of things wrong...

But I think it would be better on gamecube, I mean, it would be the exact same game, just with better graphics and load times. Aside from the hardware aspect of it it would be the same game.

So with that in mind I think it would be better on a Gamecube...
 
Dakota said:
lol, he spelled lots of things wrong...

But I think it would be better on gamecube, I mean, it would be the exact same game, just with better graphics and load times. Aside from the hardware aspect of it it would be the same game.

So with that in mind I think it would be better on a Gamecube...
Click to expand...
This was out for PS1, dur!!!
It wouldn't go to Gamecube it would go to N64!

I've never had a load time or graphics problem with FFVII.
 
I'm with Brittany, FFCC to me don't look fun or look like a good game so I never rented it or wanted to buy it. But most of the FF games on the PS and the PS2 I want to play to get (FFVII, FFVIII, FFIX, FFX, FFX-2, FFXI and FFXII all them I own or want to own).
The GC would load faster then the PS/2 on loading and stuff (the disks are smaller meaning faster loading and stuff) but I just don't like the FF games all that much that comes from Nintendo (FFTA I didn't like, FFCC looks like a kids game, maybe FF/FFII/FFIII is good but for the newer ones I say they are better on the PS/2).
 
protoman said:
ffcc is a realy good game and it has nothin to do with all of the outher games so thats just me
Click to expand...
Thats the problem. Its the Final Fantasy that's not a Final Fantasy.... if that makes any sense, XP
fudge01 said:
FFCC is an awesome game i baught it and ff7 would be much better on nintendo and they can put it on gamecube if they want eh :P
Click to expand...
Yea, they can also put it on PS2, infact, Square has hinted a zillion times that they will not make a FF7 remake or sequel until Sony systems lose backwards capability. Why?

Square thinks that because there is already an FF7 for PS1 that can be played on PS2, then making a second one would be useless. I definetly don't agree with it, but that's their decision.

Don't expect for anything new with FF7, exept for the additions in the Compilation, and probably a port onto PSP.
dark Charizard said:
i voted better because every game they came out with owns
Click to expand...
And what exactly have they came out with recently?

2 games? FFTA and FFCC?

If you haven't noticed, Square has been with Sony for the last decade(almost).
 
Crystal Chronicles had some neat ideas, but it never explored them. That and making someone the chalice….person who serves the others really dragged it downhill.
 
LittleFascistPanties16 said:
Square thinks that because there is already an FF7 for PS1 that can be played on PS2, then making a second one would be useless. I definetly don't agree with it, but that's their decision.

Don't expect for anything new with FF7, exept for the additions in the Compilation, and probably a port onto PSP.
And what exactly have they came out with recently?
Click to expand...
<_< Square would make lots of money off of it because if it has new things on it and stuff then people will buy it even if they have FFVII (I would and I just beat FFVII 4 days ago) because they will want to play it again with the new stuff. And also it will get people that wanted to play FFVII but never could find it (I found one but it was the last copy the store had and it was used but I didn't care because I looked everywhere for it).
 
it dont matter if final fantasy stays with nintendo. now the last final fantasy games are less complicated. they are to easy from 9 and up including crystal chronicles and tactics.
 
Last edited:
You can never really tell until another one comes out...however the game that came out for the Gamecube was well...bad...the one for the GBA pretty good. I would say that they should only come out with a FF game for nintendo if its on a handheld...they did well in the past they will continue to do good...but only on the handhelds.
 
Idk about them. FFCC was a pretty good game to start w/ but once u get a few years in, it gets 2 b too repetitive, and the characters dont level up, so it makes it vrey hard 2 get stronger. as for ffta, that was just plain lame.
 
I think if Tactics was made for PS2 wit some high quality graphic cut scenes that would b great and some more polygon chars instead of 2D animation
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top