• Ever thought it'd be cool to have your art, writing, or challenge runs featured on PokéCommunity? Click here for info - we'd love to spotlight your work!
  • Welcome to PokéCommunity! Register now and join one of the best fan communities on the 'net to talk Pokémon and more! We are not affiliated with The Pokémon Company or Nintendo.
    Register

FireWind

Mullet said:
I'm probally using Big Bang Shot, but I don't need Metorain, I've got plentey of Trample, I wasn't going to use BBS, but when the new ban list showed up, I had some extra spots open. I'll post it up when I'm done with it, but untill then just look forward to it, and get ready for a fun new deck to try out in your meta. Most of the time I just type up my ideas, and get people to rate it, I sometimes don't even have the deck together.:P
Click to expand...
BBS is too risky sometimes. Sure you get 400 extra atack but not always trusting.
 
Book of Moon and Enemy Controller are not the same, and in the end Enemy Controller just can't "replace" Book of Moon (but in Mullet's case, it'll still work because we are going offensive with trample.) Controller just can't take Book of Moon's spot completely...

Cyber Dragon is played in 3s. If it's played in 2, then the last tribute is Airknight Parshath (because everyone panics now with the loss of any way to draw cards). 2 or 3, Cyber Dragon can still be played and very effective no matter how you look at it.

Phoenix is overrated (I said that too many times back in Sept) but it's still used commonly. I won't like it if it has 2400 atk, while all but one of my cards in this deck got lower than that. Of course, an ordinary deck can easily handle Phoenix because certain company completely underrated the power of some certain card and didn't restrict/limit it at all.

Sakuretsu > Bottomless in most cases, but then this deck doesn't have your standard removing monsters, so Bottomless will have to stay.

I still don't see why Waboku should be played again for now, though situations change very quickly with the new Metagame. Everything is so offensive currently, that it's probably much more ideal to destroy the offending monster than to stall it off and deal with it next time. However, I do admit that such mindset is the exact reason why Cyber Dragon is so successful. Everyone tries to destroy each other asap, that an empty field is just guaranteed to show up very quickly, and that's exactly what the "would-have-been-dead-draw" Cyber Dragons want.

Stamping Destruction can't be chained because it's just a normal spell, but it's still a method of destroying magics/traps... we'll see.
 
frostweaver said:
Book of Moon and are Enemy Controller not the same, and in the end Enemy Controller just can't "replace" Book of Moon (but in Mullet's case, it'll still work because we are going offensive with trample.) Controller just can't take Book of Moon's spot completely...

Cyber Dragon is played in 3s. If it's played in 2, then the last tribute is Airknight Parshath (because everyone panics now with the loss of any way to draw cards). 2 or 3, Cyber Dragon can still be played and very effective no matter how you look at it.

Phoenix is overrated (I said that too many times back in Sept) but it's still used commonly. I won't like it if it has 2400 atk, while all but one of my cards in this deck got lower than that. Of course, an ordinary deck can easily handle Phoenix because certain company completely underrated the power of some certain card and didn't restrict/limit it at all.

Sakuretsu > Bottomless in most cases, but then this deck doesn't have your standard removing monsters, so Bottomless will have to stay.

I still don't see why Waboku should be played again for now, though situations change very quickly with the new Metagame. Everything is so offensive currently, that it's probably much more ideal to destroy the offending monster than to stall it off and deal with it next time. However, I do admit that such mindset is the exact reason why Cyber Dragon is so successful. Everyone tries to destroy each other asap, that an empty field is just guaranteed to show up very quickly, and that's exactly what the "would-have-been-dead-draw" Cyber Dragons want.

Stamping Destruction can't be chained because it's just a normal spell, but it's still a method of destroying magics/traps... we'll see.
Click to expand...
Dust Torando is better than Stamping Desruction, basically, all you get is a burn effect.

I see Cyber dragon take all of the tributes spot

Enemy Controller is good but people think it can, but it no where near staple, I could tell you that.
 
Well EC is one of the best cards out there now, and it could easily become a staple.

Well Frosty if most decks are offence in your meta then you should use Waboku to prevent damage from there big monsters then sac your Lv. 4 or lower monsters to bring out your big stuff, and beat their face in.

Big Bang Shot is really good for the Trample deck I'm playing.

Yes, Dust Tornado is better than Stamping Destruction.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top