Hacked Pokémon Battle Reporting thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
what are you talking about i didn't even battle you. now ppl are just making things up.


People coming in this thread with 0 proof of anything they are talking about.
 
Iwillmakeyoufaint said:
what are you talking about i didn't even battle you. now ppl are just making things up.


People coming in this thread with 0 proof of anything they are talking about.
Click to expand...

Are you kidding me? Do you have anterograde amnesia or something?

No, no, you're right, I made all those things up for kicks.

Like I said in the PM, if you're truly innocent, you wouldn't mind a stat check. PM me whenever you're ready to go into the trade screen, and then we'll have definitive proof.
 
Iwillmakeyoufaint said:
what are you talking about i didn't even battle you. now ppl are just making things up.


People coming in this thread with 0 proof of anything they are talking about.
Click to expand...

Stat checking your pokemon is rather easy. Though i already know the outcome of that but i think that richard should check your pokemon.
 
It's just a waste of time. It's obvious he hacked, leave it at that until he is punished.
 
J_Zero was using a Arcues against me and kingofClubs...he used 3 Raquaza 2 raikou and 1 Ghost Arceus against me..i won of course with my 400spatk+chioce spec+downlown porygon-Z..ice beamed all his pokemon...But i dont want noone to lose like KingofCLub lost bc he is not playing fair with a Arceus nor is he following rules...
 
Iwillmakeyoufaint is clearly posting BS everyware so everyone simply, STOP TALKING TO HIM, ignore him thats what i did, he requested a battle and i knew he hacked so i disregarded the pm, and i'm apparently a sore loser for that, dont battle him, don't listen to him and he'll soon fade away from PC
 
Master.Over.All said:
J_Zero was using a Arcues against me and kingofClubs...he used 3 Raquaza 2 raikou and 1 Ghost Arceus against me..i won of course with my 400spatk+chioce spec+downlown porygon-Z..ice beamed all his pokemon...But i dont want noone to lose like KingofCLub lost bc he is not playing fair with a Arceus nor is he following rules...
Click to expand...

It's impossible to have Arceus without AR, so this should be dealt with quickly..
 
Nightofshadow said:
Stat checking your pokemon is rather easy. Though i already know the outcome of that but i think that richard should check your pokemon.
Click to expand...

who is he to check my team? I never battled him anyway.

FoxHound said:
Iwillmakeyoufaint is clearly posting BS everyware so everyone simply, STOP TALKING TO HIM, ignore him thats what i did, he requested a battle and i knew he hacked so i disregarded the pm, and i'm apparently a sore loser for that, dont battle him, don't listen to him and he'll soon fade away from PC
Click to expand...

yeah give me the "silent treatment" lol kids.
 
Last edited:
I just want to point out that warnings dont really do anything, Warning someone over the internet has what kind of effect on them exactly? Sorry to say, but i think threatening with warnings isnt really a threat =\.
 
I'm seriously sick and tired of people accusing me of hacking just becuase I caught it in a DARN MASTERBALL!! That doesn't mean i'm a hacker. Hacking moves and stats mean's you're a hacker. He's even telling me iv hack, and he's deafeating me?
 
Last edited:
Torterra defender is a hacker. He used a Shiny Deoxys in a Cherish Ball. I 5-0'ed him anyway, lol. If he didn't crit I'd had 6-0'ed him xD.
 
i m sorry

i didnt know it was hacked. i got it from a friend i promise not to use it again ok and if it was hacked there is no way he couldve beaten it so easily which means his pokemon are haked
 
Torterra defender said:
i didnt know it was hacked. i got it from a friend i promise not to use it again ok and if it was hacked there is no way he couldve beaten it so easily which means his pokemon are haked
Click to expand...

It doesnt even matter dude, it is against the rules to play with ubers, AND dead obvious it is hacked lol
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top