The stats isn't the final indicator. He also cannot be found in the wild and is described in legends, while those are not.Glaceon has super high stats. So does the following pokemon:
· Rapidash
· Espeon
· Alakazam
· Metagross
· Salamence
· Leafeon
· Tyranitar
· Yanmega
· Electivire
· Magmortar
· etc
According to your logic, these must be legends too lol, cause obviously they're super strong and cannot be found in the wild.
And that last comment? Someone takes pokedex entries very seriously lol. Also, did you notice that every legendary possible had their own movie? Why isn't one dedicated to Arcanine, I wonder?
Oh, right. It isn't a legendary.
1.) It cannot be found in the wild because it evolves from another Pokemon. Legendary Pokemon do not have an evolutionary chain.Arcanine is a legend:
1.) Cannot be found in the wild
2.) Super-high stats
3.) And most importantly, described in legends
The term "legendary" was applied by the fandom. It can be as general or restricting as we want it to be... The Japanese version have three different types of the American "legendary", which includes many Pokemon.
1.) It cannot be found in the wild because it evolves from another Pokemon. Legendary Pokemon do not have an evolutionary chain.
2.) 555 is hardly super-high.
3.) There are two definitions of legendary. There is the "legendary" definition straight out of the dictionary (one that is described in legends), and Pokemon's own little definition of legendary (including the criteria to meet the requirements for being an official legendary Pokemon with the list of the 35 official legends). Yes, Arcanine is legendary because it is described in legends, but I'm pretty sure the main topic of this thread is to determine if Arcanine fits into Pokemon's definition of legendary (which would be a flat, no).
That entry doesn't state it's legendary. Tearing down mountains is cool, but not legendary.One pokedex entry states that if you piss off a tyranitar, it goes on an endless rampage, tearing down moutains. Or at least it's said to.
Yeah, it's totally a legendary. No one ever saw it do this; it was just described.
Ho-oh is actually going to be featured in the upcoming 13th movie lol, someone obviously hasn't heard.
Arcanine isn't special. But he's the focus of legends, as is the great Slowpoke, so he should be honoured.Then what makes Arcanine so special? Being mentioned in legend is cool, too.
Still doesn't make it a legendary.
The movie circulates around Lugia battling ho-oh. I doubt a fight like that is going to show for only five seconds. :[
Yes, Slowpoke has been legendary since Gold and Silver... Unless you never played the games?Wait slowpoke is a legendary now? what is this i dont even...
I hope you know, cameos happen to be quite brief.
Rayquaza and Deoxys battle = like more than half the movie.
Power does not equal legendary status.
Uhh. Read my posts... Legendary-focus = Legendary-status.
Uhh. Read my posts... Legendary-focus = Legendary-status.The only thing that even makes Arcanine come close to being legendary is it's power.
So then why do you say it is legendary if power 'does not equal legendary status'? ]:
I think you know what term of legendary that this thread is referring to. :/The term "legendary" was applied by the fandom. It can be as general or restricting as we want it to be... The Japanese version have three different types of the American "legendary", which includes many Pokemon.
Shut up, Toto, you know you agree with me.Gah. It is classified amongst Legends ; just because the ancient being and PokeDex entries say such things doesn't make him a Legendary, he is a Legend but does not come under the Legendary Specie of Pokemon ; If he's a legend, cool then, i may also catch lot's of Growlithe buy Fire Stone's and make him evolve into Arcanine, and Ta da! i've got so many Legendaries, All those who think that Arcanine is a Legendary they are Weirdo's~ Enough said. Period.
Myths aren't real, and Arcanine is a catchable Pokemon, so it technically cannot be a myth.Arcanine is a Pokemon of myth.
Myths can or cannot be real. It can't be verified. And I never said Arcanine himself was a myth, I said the little "story" behind him was a myth.Myths aren't real, and Arcanine is a catchable Pokemon, so it technically cannot be a myth.
Oh, my bad then. I see what you mean.Myths can or cannot be real. It can't be verified. And I never said Arcanine himself was a myth, I said the little "story" behind him was a myth.
^ Arcanine was originally planned to be a legendary, but Game Freak decided not to apparently. They then just gave it the legendary species (and that would then give thousands of people ideas lol).Bulbapedia said:Because of its high stats, its species, and the fact that it was illustrated in an ancient slab along with the legendary birds in the second episode, it could be theorized that Arcanine was originally planned to be part of the legendary trio in first generation games; possibly even the birds' trio master.
Yeah, I am using Bulbapedia, but all this is true.Bulbapedia said:Because of how brief and uninformative the description of a Pokémon often is in its species, and how little the species relates to other data, it is not often regarded as an important piece of information about a Pokémon.