• Ever thought it'd be cool to have your art, writing, or challenge runs featured on PokéCommunity? Click here for info - we'd love to spotlight your work!
  • Dawn, Gloria, Juliana, or Summer - which Pokémon protagonist is your favorite? Let us know by voting in our poll!
  • Welcome to PokéCommunity! Register now and join one of the best fan communities on the 'net to talk Pokémon and more! We are not affiliated with The Pokémon Company or Nintendo.
    Register

It should be fe/male

crobatdeluxe

You can't be a legend...
    • 182
    Posts
    16
    Years
    Which pokemon do you think should be a gender-specific pokemon? Mine are:

    Male:
    ~Ttar (i can't imagine him to be a female)
    ~Seaking (hello? A girl king?)
    ~kingdra (same as above)
    ~Gliscor (with that evil look? no way!)
    ~Primeape
    ~Machamp
    ~Arcanine
    ~Kingler (another king)
    ~All starters except Meganium
    ~Crobat

    Female
    ~Clefairy family
    ~Jigglypuff family
    ~Milotic (or am i mistaken?)
    ~Meganium

    Any ideas?
     
    Honestly, I don't think any of those pokemon should be female, especially Ttar.
    Why? Because females are important for breeding, and I'm sure you know why.

    I don't think any of those pokemon you listed should be male either.
    I don't see any need for it.
    And definitely not Milotic. XD.
     
    I can't imagine Gardevoir being male, it looks too feminine. especially since Gallade came along.
     
    You mention those Pokemon, yet not Mr. Mime? =P

    That's by the name though - but female Mr Mimes don't exactly work. Ah well, names and translations and whatnot, unless they add a side-evolution it'll stay that way...
     
    Yeah, Mr. Mime puzzles me. :-/

    The Seaking one made me laugh, though, since it evolves from Goldeen, which is a water queen. Would it change genders when it evolves? XD
     
    I cant remeber if manaphy has a gender but it most definatelly male. Manaphy The king of the sea!
     
    The concept of a male Milotic and Ninetales is kind of weird...

    On Gardevoir and Gallade, I wish a Kirlia would just evolve to them by level-up, and become Gardevoir if female and Gallade if male. Or, remove the gender restriction on Gallade. (I never could see why Gallade has to be male anyway...)
     
    It's always bugged me a little that there are female Kadabra and Alakazam. Why? Because of the mustaches.

    Bearded lady much?...
     
    To this day I still wonder over the Mr.Mime thing. And I cannot imagine Gliscor being female..its just, ugh.
     
    lol, male Gardevoir. They should just make it so Kirlia evolves like Burmy--if it's female, it evolves into Gardevoir at level 30. If it's male, it evolves into Gallade. Then everyone's happy and no poor males are permanently forced into ballgowns. But then again, I wouldn't be able to imagine a Kirlia being male if I lived in the Pokemon world. ...It's a trap! D:

    Also, Alakazam. Female, with that 'stashe? LIES. Same goes for Gyarados.
    And Machamp? Well, it's not totally implausible...it's just...not very pleasant to think about.
     
    crobatdeluxe said:
    ~All starters except Meganium
    Click to expand...

    This confuses me. Venusaur? Especially seeing as its named after Venus, a GODDESS. Swampert, Blaziken and Torterra also confuse me, I could see them as being either gender. To some length, I could see others being female as well. The only starters that definately strike me as male are Infernape and Feraligatr.
     
    Some are just too pretty to be male.
    Milotic, Dragonair, Gardevoir etc.

    Machop, Machoke and Machamp. Female with like HUMONGOUS muscles. I know there are some females out there like that but...
    Female Machokes always freaked me a bit.
     
    I can't imagine how horrible it would be to see two Machamps mating.
    *head asplode*
     
    you neglected to mention Mr. Mime and Mime Jr. and I dont see whats wrong with Gliscor not being able to be a female all because of its looks. Thats a bit sexes if you look at it


    :t354:TG
     
    Whenever I'm catching Pokémon, I'm very gender strict. If I find a wild Pokémon that doesn't suit the gender I'll just leave it (I'm a real perfectionist) or if it's rare I'll breed it. I think every Pokémon should have a set gender that suits it.
     
    Umm. No. Set genders are just sexist, and most of the Pokemon you people suggest (Gyarados, really?) only make it obvious that you're all sexist.

    Yes, GameFreak should make them more sexually dimorphic. But set genders? No.
     
    You must log in or register to reply here.
    Back
    Top