MKDS_PoKE
PC Battle Community Helper
- 164
- Posts
- 18
- Years
- VIVA LAS VEGAS!
- Seen Apr 19, 2008
Heh, I've read this thread over, and I'm leaning towards keeping the legends banned. On the most part, legends start off pretty strong, so you don't really have to train them. So, as Hoshiko had mentioned, this makes them very appealing to n00bs. The Uber legends maybe even more so, however.
The point is, I'd rather fight with non-legends, as they tend to show that the opponent knows what he or she is doing. Sure, you can catch several Pokemon in the 50+ range, but those trained from hatchlings will be better.
Having said all this, I'd support having a battle thread where legends were allowed. I just wouldn't be participating, is all. I had changed the rule in the tournament here, because it seemed that the majority of people had your way of thinking, MKDS_PoKE. However, I was glad to find out that they weren't.
Thank you, i'd also like to note that Legends do need training to become extra powerful. For example, for AZELF to be strong you need to give it the standard EV spread:
252 atk / 252 spd / 6 (whatever)
Well, some people use legends for reasons other than convinience. I am rather fond of Celebii. If I had one, I would use it.
More people need to know the difference between "Ubers", "Legendaries" and "non-Uber Legendaries". Most people see the Uber list with mostly Legendaries but Wobbufet, they automatically assume that all Legendaries are Ubers. And since "Ubers" are bad to them, that means ALL "Legendaries" are bad. I really think that we need more clarification in the different types of Legendaries, what's fairplay and what's not.
You just stated the whole purpose of this thread.
Unfortunately, it seems your right.