• Ever thought it'd be cool to have your art, writing, or challenge runs featured on PokéCommunity? Click here for info - we'd love to spotlight your work!
  • Our weekly protagonist poll is now up! Vote for your favorite Legends: Z-A protagonist in the poll by clicking here.
  • Welcome to PokéCommunity! Register now and join one of the best fan communities on the 'net to talk Pokémon and more! We are not affiliated with The Pokémon Company or Nintendo.

Kazaa- now illegal?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Kazaa? Illegal? You don't say?

Who cares anyway? They're not launching a mass hunt of all its users or anything. They're just making examples of those who abuse it in an attempt to scare everyone else off. So unless you literally live for downloading copyrighted music/media, or have a strong sense of righteousness, then there's really nothing special going on. Byatch.

Kazaa have been taken to court about a million times already anyway.
 
LiquidThunder said:
Even if canadians downloaded from Kazaa, I don't think that the publishers lawyers, would go and try to sue every single person who downloaded off it, and its just like roms on the internet, its illegal, but nobody seems to care to do anything.

They do not have the budget to do that unless they use the profits from suing to fund another person's justice but it would take a great deal of time unless they had at least 10,000 Lawyers... That would probably saturate the canadian justice system.

Haruka said:
I hate Privacy. I perfer buying the whole CD or buying it from a payed online service. It's a sin to steal things from other people. You know that. It's in the 10 comandments. :P

Don't you mean piracy?

Haruka said:
so, it will be a sin to hate digimon.. Oh my gosh!

I can still dislike it. ;)

LiquidThunder said:
Everybody steals in thier life without even noticing it, eg. Taking pictures off the internet, or even using pics in signatures.

How can you commit a crime without knowing it? You know you what are you doing when you are doing it.

22sa said:
Yeah and some people use it to determine if they actually want to buy the CD or not. A lot of CDs I bought kind of felt like rip-offs where only one or two songs are good and not the rest...

They aren't supposed to be using it in the first place.

DragonTrainer said:
Even if they get rid of kazaa, people will make new piracy sites.All I download from the net is roms.

You must mean P2P programs. Anyway, if the ISPs got together and blocked a couple of ports, P2P would cease to exist.

G-LANCE said:
if they're gonna ban kazaa they might as well make mp3's illegal!
(i have an mp3, a really cool one too)

MP3s are music files, they aren't illegal. However, what they are of can be illegal.

images said:
it isn't exactly illegal, since no one is selling the stuff on kazaa. it's called "sharing"

When you steal something, the owner of that is losing money. Stealing means losing money, not making it.

22sa said:
I think Nintendo has copyright for it's games for like 70 years or so... After the copyright to expires, it'll be legal to download ROMs I guess.

70 Years after the death of the author.

Haruka said:
pffft.. It's the RIAA fualt that the prices go up. Prices go up on CDs when people stop buying them.. Oh, yets go download them off for free. NOT! do you know downloading music illeagally is stealing?

There are places that open up. You can buy a single music file for a cheap price. Examples like Apple's iTunes, Real One, etc. The half of the profits go to the RIAA. :P isn't that nice?

Supply and Demand. When the demand is low prices go down, not up. For the music companies, raising them would be a nice thing and since they own the song, they can charge $500 for it if they want.

Dizzy said:
I agree ,

The Riaa Needs to back off , The more people downloads the artists song , the more popular.......

They don't want you to download it for the same reason you want to download it. They don't care about their popularity, they care about how much money they make being popular. Just like how you download it because you don't want to spend a few dollars on it. Or like how a person steals food because he doesn't have money to buy it.

frostweaver said:
well you see regarding roms...

i download roms that i cannot possibly buy anymore, like the old SNES ones (as if they're going to remake them). The only way to get the old SNES roms is to download. The remake versions on GBA are just not the same...

i do not download music off the net except for game music, and last time i checked i do not see a "Legend of Dragoon Music Collection" in stores... the only game that has made a CD is Final Fantasy (but actually it's the CD of a guy who composed like 90% of FF songs... like Liberai Fatali and etc)

You see Napster got shut down because of this copyright problems. Think Kazaa will share the same fate?

It is illegal regardless of the avaliability. If you lived in a country where you were too poor to get US Dollars, would counterfitting them be right?

DragonTrainer said:
I possibly think that kazaa will be shut down for good.I think that it is ok to download old roms, but not movies and music.

It has legal cover as it is a tool that can be used to steal music. Just like a hammer is a tool that can be used to bash a person's face in.

Kairi said:
The thing is though, KaZaA is not centralized. It's people spreading and sharing files. KaZaA has legitimate uses as well, whereas Napster was solely for taking music.

Eep...I meant to not post in this topic. x_x; Oh well.

You are right. However, what those uses are, is yet to be shown.

22sa said:
That's what I thought a while ago. Except, they still have copyright, and ROMs were always illegal to download.

Also Haruka, I had meant hate towards other humands (which excludes animals and such).

They are illegal to upload as well.

Haruka said:
Now, they have a more legal way of getting music.

Apple's iTunes.

Use MS's Premium services via Windows Media Player 9. I believe Napster is now a legitmate online music purchasing service that can be used via WM9.
 
The vast majority of artists don't own their own copyrights, the record labels do...so it's the RIAA that's losing money because of file sharing, not necessarily the artists. Also, I would attribute the decline in CD sales to all the crappy music they're saturating the market with...CDs with two or three good songs out of eleven or so seem to have become the norm. Who wants to spend twenty bucks for two good songs when you can download them for free? Anyway, these new pay-for-download sites are a great idea, but they probably can't help me in my search for rare or not-'popular' music. In addition, I am poor. ;P
 
Thats the problem. too many people are too into "getting music for free". It's not free when you get sued by the RIAA. Then you have to pay hundreds and hundreds of dollars. Than it won't be free anymore, eh?

:D
 
WMP has a service? what is it's pricing/format etc? They don't promote it much, I hadn't heard of it.
 
SA, I never knew WMP 9...

Wait... it's the premium subscriptions on the player. You have to pay a monthly fee on it. :P
 
Kairi, it is the Premium Services tab in Windows Media Player 9.

Haruka, and how much does iTunes cost? 99? per a song even if you only want to listen to it once? I believe MusicNow costs $4.95 a month for the radio and $9.95 for access to everything. That allows you to download unlimited songs. To burn them costs 99? per a song. Some people defend P2P by stating that it allows to "try out" out songs before buying them. They neglect to mention that is illegal and chances are, they will not buy the songs because they already stole copies of them. MusicNow allows you to legally try out songs and then buy the ones you like for 99?. With iTunes, you have to pay 99? for every song you try out. Not very practical, eh?
 
Shining Arcanine said:
Kairi it is the Premium Services tab in Windows Media Player 9.

Haruka, and how much does iTunes cost? 99? per a song even if you only want to listen to it once? I believe MusicNow costs $4.95 a month for the radio and $9.95 for access to everything. That allows you to download unlimited songs. To burn them costs 99? per a song. Some people defend P2P by stating that it allows to "try out" out songs before buying them. They neglect to mention that is illegal and chances are, they will not buy the songs because they already stole copies of them. MusicNow allows you to legally try out songs and then buy the ones you like for 99?. With iTunes, you have to pay 99? for every song you try out. Not very practical, eh?

:P..

but with iTunes, you can burn the MP3s on a CD and also keep the file. :P
 
Ok, here is a situation, you want to find some nice songs so you try out 1000 songs, then discover you only want 10. With iTunes, congladulations, you just spent $990 and have 990 songs that you don't even like. With MusicNow, you just spent $19.85 ($9.95+(10*$0.99)) saving $970.15 off the price of iTunes and have songs that you like.

Edit: Not to mention you can listen to the 990 songs you don't like plus millions more for the duration of your subscription.
 
Oh, and iTunes' copy-protection can be very easily broken, and then spread on KaZaA. Just thought I would add that.
 
Yeah, you're only 'supposed to be able to put it on an iPod and your computer, but there are some very easy ways around it.
 
well, they also share music that is copyrighted online via KaZza. Anyway, I still hate piravcy. :P
 
Well, no it has some protection where you couldn't put the file on KaZaA and have it work on another's computer. It's possible for the average Joe to strip the copy protection.

Yeah, that is the sad thing. Some, not most of the stuff on KaZaA is legal. Old versions of free software, for instance. It's a prime example of, if there is a good resource in this world, men will find a way to make it bad and cause suffering to its users.
 
Kairi said:
Well, no it has some protection where you couldn't put the file on KaZaA and have it work on another's computer. It's possible for the average Joe to strip the copy protection.

Yeah, that is the sad thing. Some, not most of the stuff on KaZaA is legal. Old versions of free software, for instance. It's a prime example of, if there is a good resource in this world, men will find a way to make it bad and cause suffering to its users.

Don't you mean men and women. *Feels discriminated against on account of gender*

lol, j/k, anyway, if ISPs got together, they would be able to end P2P by simpling blocking all traffic going and coming from a few ports.
 
However, some companies use P2P in their businesses to transfer things. It's not a bad technology, just one that is too easily abused. It needs to be controlled responsibly.

Men have fashioned most of the inventions in this world so far, and they are usually the ones to ruin them to. Women have done many good and bad things, and men's achievements should be to their credit not their debit. That's a whole 'nother matter though.

If KaZaA and other P2P networks were responsible, they could filter out things from being put up, or limit what kinds of files can be shared. I'd hate to see P2P go altogether, but it has been a major source of piracy that should be stopped. I don't care if CDs are expensive and the songs are poor, you can not deny that part of sale drops have been from people who have access to them for free.
 
No wounder the US Ecomany is going down.. noone wants to buy their goods anymore.
 
Kairi said:
However, some companies use P2P in their businesses to transfer things. It's not a bad technology, just one that is too easily abused. It needs to be controlled responsibly.

Men have fashioned most of the inventions in this world so far, and they are usually the ones to ruin them to. Women have done many good and bad things, and men's achievements should be to their credit not their debit. That's a whole 'nother matter though.

If KaZaA and other P2P networks were responsible, they could filter out things from being put up, or limit what kinds of files can be shared. I'd hate to see P2P go altogether, but it has been a major source of piracy that should be stopped. I don't care if CDs are expensive and the songs are poor, you can not deny that part of sale drops have been from people who have access to them for free.

Companies should not be using a P2P service to transfer their files.
 
Maybe they shouldn't, but I was under the impression some were. Still, it's a viable technology, just one that-as I said, is vulnerable to mal-use more than most.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top