Made and Assembled in Japan by Slyph Company

[Legobricks]

Please don't ask what Exp. All is, if you're new enough to Pokemon not to know then you have obviously never used it and can obviously not possibly prefer it without presumption.

 

[Deleted member 143209]

Exp. Share it's just a lot easier training one at a time. Unless you're using like 3 pokmemon then exp All is fine. But seeing as ints not in circulation any longer i guess exp.Share is a lot more popular

 

[Squeegee Beckenheim]

Exp. All was always fun, but it kinda screwed everything up when training. I prefer Exp Share. Better to specifically say which Pokemon needs the experience. If you need more than one Pokemon getting it; you managed to get more than one like I did.

 

[Fire Eagle]

I don't really care of Exp. Share that much, but Exp. All was better for me because I usually have one Pokemon that is 10 levels higher than the rest of the team.

 

[Echoing Song]

If I wanted the exp to be divided into three(or more)... I'd use two exp shares(or more)

I generally don't though

 

[msdmario]

Exp. Share by far. Exp. All is just annoying to work with since I find it easier training one weak Pokemon at a time. You have no control on how your experience is split with Exp. All unless you deposit all the Pokemon that you don't want receiving some of it. Since I carry six Pokemon almost all the time, I find it annoying earning very little experience since it is divided between six Pokemon.

 

[templekeeper]

Exp. All got annoying 'cause didn't it have to do each pokemon every single faint? That gets old really quicky. Admittedly, I did miss it at first, but, now with EV training, it's impractical-

 

[Meadow]

I like the EXP. All because it boosted my PKMN a whole lot whenever I beat a gym leader.

 

[processr]

I prefer the Exp. All, as I was always one to try and train my Pokémon evenly. Exp. Shares are good if you're blitzing through the E4 to train a hatchling, though. =3

 

[Legobricks]

Really I'm surprised at how even the results are.