Mysterious pokemon folloing Ash and friends?

ETR, your screenshot doesn't even show up for me.

And I believer someoen has said before, you've stated your opinion, you have the right to argue it, but your on the edge of flamming us.
 
If I were flaming, I'd be insulting you all and throwing insults every which direction. I'm simply saying you're all gullible for believing something that there's no proof of. Hardly an insult.
 
lyk omg!!!11 mayb its a new dimondperl pokemon!

lol or it culd b the king of all pokemon i agre!!!!!!!11 i want 2 no wat it is!
 
*narrows eyes* He makes more sense than most of you do on a regular basis.
 
Gullible? Those screenshots are too small to see anything. Get a bigger one that I can actually SEE and I'll believe you. Also, just because I post ONE side of an arguement doesn't mean I'm ignoring the other side. This thread is for the POSITIVE side of the arguement, I was merely relpying with my thoughts on that side. But since your so bent on us agreeing with you, I'll post my observation of the negitave side too:

Alright, Zerro, you DO need a little more proof. Screenshots, for one. And you said he was in every movie, but you only gave us two and one episode, which ETV claims never exhisted. This makes people less likely to believe you. And the idea itself is a bit skeptical, since there have already been many claims to the king of pok?mon. Maybe it's an animation effect, or something to juice up the story a bit. Kinda like people will do in role plays.

Are you happy now? Am I still "gullible"?


**Calms down** Okay, I'll calm down now. I don't want to get this thread closed.
 
Oh, for the love of Isis ><
Are you kidding me with this?? o.o
There's no shadow following Ash around, other than TR <<;. Most times when animated movies are released several "oops" are made in either the ink or the drawing itself. Perhaps what you see is none other then an animation mistake. Why on Earth would a Pok?mon be following him around. Sure he has several enounters with legendaries and all that other stuff but it's Satoshi we're talkin' about here, the MAIN character of the anime.

And Zerro has not presented us with any evidence at all. Untill he presents us with actual concrete evidence *coughscreenshotscough* this will remain for me as BS. If they were presenting a new Pok?mon like they did in the episode where they sort of saw Elekid then they would have shown more than just a shadow. And the "king of all Pok?mon"? Correct me if I am wrong but there's no universaly strong Pok?mon. There are only very strong legenderies. They all have their weaknesses, let's say you pit Groudon against Kyogre. Now who do you think is bound to win?
I rest my case...
 
Well first of all I really wasnt trying to get people upset over this. Yes it sounds very upsurd. But I have no reason to lie to you, and that episode dose exsit, Ill find it and post it. And the pic you put, did u not think that maybe it might not be in this one, thats what I thought. But on closer examination I found what dosent belong. It is perfectly alined with the beam, so its not a mistake(which there are hardly none of anyway secince editors edit out the stuf. Take a look for urself, and I will find a better one but for now this will do.
 
If you want to argue about one another, you're most certainly welcome to do so, but not on the forum. Take it to MSN.

Zerro -- That proves absolutely nothing. <_<;
 
Zerro said:
Well first of all I really wasnt trying to get people upset over this. Yes it sounds very upsurd. But I have no reason to lie to you, and that episode dose exsit, Ill find it and post it. And the pic you put, did u not think that maybe it might not be in this one, thats what I thought. But on closer examination I found what dosent belong. It is perfectly alined with the beam, so its not a mistake(which there are hardly none of anyway secince editors edit out the stuf. Take a look for urself, and I will find a better one but for now this will do.
...You're kidding me, right? You do realize that's a part of the building, right? Jesus. This is further proof that you're looking too deep into things and mistakening them for things that don't exist.
 
they'd be no reason to add in something that's not part of the plot, it'd just confuse people and waste time for the anamators. the only 'mysterious shadow' was in the ep 'misty meets her match' and that was a tracey sketch that was to promote G/S (he sketched a shadow mon not knowing what it was [it was Elekid])
 
Zerro, that still doesn't prove much. I don't think you're lying ,but maybe you are looking a bit too deep into it. That is, I believe, part of the building, as ETR said. And like I've asked alreay, that is almost impossible to see. Is ANYONE here capible of posting larger images? At least 500x500.

Let's see... what have they done this way beofre? They've done a not-so-extreme version of this with several pok?mon:
Elekid
Suicune
Raikou
Ho-oh (Though he wasn't shadowed)

And probably more that I can't think of right now.
 
I was just saying maybe there planing somthing big. Many shows put in screct things into there animation, That u cant even see unless u slow everythng down. It is a possiblity. only time will tell. And thats all I got to say on this subject.
 
Well, I'm in between beleiving you and not. I beleive yes there may be something on the artwork that would seem like ash's being followed, but no i do not beleive it is a new/king/ultimate pokemon. A lot of anime has more than you see off the bat. A lot of anime artists will intentionally put small, seemingly significant objects on their artworks. They are called pen signatures. They are not usually actual writingm like a nmae or words, but are usually whatever the artist decides to put. This 'shadow' you see following Ash may be nothing more than one of the pen signitures of an overly bored artist. For example. In Seinfeld (sp) if you look hard enough you will find a superman action figure in every episode. They are just like cameos and usually mean nothing to anyone except the artist.
 
well personally, I dont think Zero is making up crap for the hell of it, and this whole thing may indeed be true im not denying, but upon personaly opinion, I dont think it is right, proberbly just a mix up, but if I see some better eviidence den I will aplologise and say no more.

But truth be told I do think it ids the kinda thing they would do. add a hidden mystery for a plot in the last every movie/series, and I think if it is tright,m then it is Ho oH, people said that it cant be ebcaue of the size, but seeiing as we havent seen Ho oh properly yet we cant know what abilities it has on da show, it may be using a new attack, or minimize?
 
Please tell me why they would do such a thing for 276 episodes on Pocket Monsters, 129 Pocket Monsters Advanced Generation episodes, five Pocket Monsters movies, two AG movies and several specials? --; Do you know how horribly ridiculous that sounds?
 
Yeah, it's ridiculous. Good if there is one though. If there was, there'd be millions of pokemon maniacs writing into gamefreak asking about it by now. I wanna see like a huge shot of it, cuz those others don't help.
 
Back
Top