New Pokemon Series + Misty And May Return!

I am very excited to see Misty's return, I really do miss her old character but seeing her in any form is always exciting. :)
 
This whole thread is lol. Trolls, trolls, trolls. Too many trolls.

Blue_Drifblim said:
Actually, Rachael Lillis, who was Misty's VA, voiced Maylene in DP66-69. I don't know if the PUSA/4Kids switch-thingy would prevent her from playing Misty again, but I thought I'd let you know that she did come back to voice somebody. Some other 4Kids VA have come back to play other minor characters too, so there could be a chance that she would play her again if Misty ever came back for a while. :P If I've gotten something wrong, somebody please tell me.
Click to expand...

Yeah, it's possible Rachael Lillis would come back to voice Misty. Giovanni was voiced by someone different in the early DP episodes, but Ted Lewis came back to voice him in DP80.
 
AdvancedK9 said:
Ok. I sure read it. But is that all you are reading from my posts? :\ Where did you learn to read again?
Click to expand...

New York City's top schools. Right now I'm in one of New York's top 5 High Schools right now, since the SHSAT was so easy, so I feel assured that I can read correctly.

Anyway, I'll state it one more time: if a wiki page of any kind (Wikipedia, Bulbapedia, etc) has credible sources then there is no reason to act like an idiot [In the quote below is a great example] about using a wiki.

AdvancedK9 said:
Also, please tell me you DID NOT just quote Wikipedia. That is just plain sad.
Click to expand...

Also, it seems that you don't know what Wikipedia, or any wiki, was created for judging from this post:

AdvancedK9 said:
Because as long as there is a reliable source, we don't need Wikipedia.
Click to expand...

Wikipedia is an online encyclopedia. An encyclopedia is a book, or in this case a website, containing articles on various topics usually covering all branches of knowledge or all aspects of one subject. I got that from Webster and not a wiki just to make you feel better.

I never said Pokemon.com . The official Japanese Pokemon site is good though.
Click to expand...

You said official sources. Pokémon.com is an official source.
 
Wikipedia, or a wiki is a collection of information gathered by the general populous.
The general populous contains a very large amount of very stupid and unreliable people.
These people do not always cite creditable sources.
Wikipedia is more often than not abused by this leading to the general knee-jerk reaction that...

Wikipedia is not a reliable source.

Quoting from the actual source is better than "a more often than not" maybe true story, and when presenting the information to a large mass it's better to have the facts that have a greater chance of being true. It's primary versus secondary sources in History class.
Are you going to get your information from a journal written by a woman, or the book written about the journal written by a woman?

I don't blame anyone who says that they want the primary source that confirms Misty's appearance in the upcoming episodes over Wikipedia.
 
So you agree with me. That as long as a wiki contains credible sources/citations then it can be used.
 
Last edited:
Vişne Tanrıça said:
Wikipedia, or a wiki is a collection of information gathered by the general populous.
The general populous contains a very large amount of very stupid and unreliable people.
These people do not always cite creditable sources.
Wikipedia is more often than not abused by this leading to the general knee-jerk reaction that...

Wikipedia is not a reliable source.

Quoting from the actual source is better than "a more often than not" maybe true story, and when presenting the information to a large mass it's better to have the facts that have a greater chance of being true. It's primary versus secondary sources in History class.
Are you going to get your information from a journal written by a woman, or the book written about the journal written by a woman?

I don't blame anyone who says that they want the primary source that confirms Misty's appearance in the upcoming episodes over Wikipedia.
Click to expand...

Why do you THINK I post all the sources related to portions of Articles whenever I quote from Wikipedia? I do it so that people won't act like that I'm just talking crazy just because I cite Wikipedia. If I post the sources in relation to what an article on Wikipedia says about a certain thing, then I'm conforted that I tried to prove that these things happened.

Besides, is quoting from Official sources (Especially sources where they seem to get more things about their source material wrong than they get right) any better? Heck, I had to stick with some teachers who disparaged their Textbooks BECAUSE of the fact that they are factually inaccurate/flat out wrong. As far as I know, Official Sources and people-edited sources such as Wikis and Wikipedia are no different in that sense.
 
Hmm let me see they got this notion of them coming back most likely from seeing high touch(the OP in Japan) and its wikipedia so how about...no. If they were to return it would be one or two episodes and even then I doubt it. And let me guess besides that its the whole politoed thing yes?
 
Okay, now this thread seems to be arguing about whether or not wikipedia is a credible source rather than that there could be a possibility of Misty/May returning which is what this thread is really about. First of all, the person who made this thread actually put down what the other sources were. No one has even bothered to check them out yet. Just because wikipedia isn't always right, doesn't mean that it is always wrong. There is a 50% chance that this information is true. Before getting upset at people who want Misty/May to return and screaming at people for citing wikipedia, think about it. You're getting yourselves upset for nothing. There is a 50% chance that Misty may make an appearance in Galactic battles of Pokemon. It's not impossible. Gary reappeared several times. May has made a cameo. (I think was last season, though.) All you're saying is that wikipedia is unreliable. Way to point out the obvious! But wikipedia can sometimes be right. Before you flame me, think about what you're going to say rather than going into a rage over people who site wikipedia. All I'm saying is that there is a possibility that what this person read could be true.

I have noticed that Rachel Lillis, who originally did Misty's voice, also did the voice for Maylene. There is a possibility that they are keeping in contact with this person in case they want Misty to make a cameo.
 
weedle_mchairybug said:
Why do you THINK I post all the sources related to portions of Articles whenever I quote from Wikipedia? I do it so that people won't act like that I'm just talking crazy just because I cite Wikipedia. If I post the sources in relation to what an article on Wikipedia says about a certain thing, then I'm conforted that I tried to prove that these things happened.

Besides, is quoting from Official sources (Especially sources where they seem to get more things about their source material wrong than they get right) any better? Heck, I had to stick with some teachers who disparaged their Textbooks BECAUSE of the fact that they are factually inaccurate/flat out wrong. As far as I know, Official Sources and people-edited sources such as Wikis and Wikipedia are no different in that sense.
Click to expand...

Dude, I didn't even read your posts. This was directed totally somewhere else.
But anyways...
Official sources are different than Wikipedia. If I write on my site that I'm writing a story about Ash and Wikipedia says I am writing a story about Tracy it is not the same. If I then choose to write the story about Brock later my creditability is hurt, but only when I have done that first. You don't auto-assume that every word coming out of someone's mouth who doesn't have a history of lying is a lie do you?

Also, textbooks purposely have errors or terms are changed at a later date to sell the newer editions of textbooks. There will always be something wrong with them.

With Pokemon's creditability of saying Ash's Dad is coming in and he didn't, if the official sources are as unreliable as you say, would point to that they are just saying that to people please and have no intention to bring Misty back for a short amount of time.
 
I'm confused. This whole thread is filled with so much bullcrap I don't know where to start.
Oh well, I'll just sit in the sidelines and see what happens later...
 
.Fukari the thread is basically question the source of wikipedia being a good one or a bad one and if the Anime should have their precious Misty back.
 
I find it humorous that your desire for information regarding Pokemon leads you to Wikipedia and not Bulbapedia.

Do you realize that 10 year old boys edit Wikipedia to lengthen their e-peens and cause shatstorms (quite like this one)? Clearly it went over most people's heads.

Am I all for Misty returning? Absolutely. I wish she'd take Dawn's place and we would never hear from her, her overly short skirt, or her insidiously annoying Piplup EVER AGAIN. However, the fact that this comes from a source as unreliable as Wikipedia is ridiculous.

The problem with trusting a source such as Wikipedia is that the sources given to validate the information are themselves hardly ever credible, especially on a topic such as this. Bulbapedia would have reported news like this, should it have happened.

I mean, if you can trust a source like Wikipedia, Ash would not only have ditched Gliscor for Riolu (caz riolu is so effing leet yo diggity dawg home skillet, that shat is so cash I was liek whoa dawg!!1one!11uno!11eleventy), and had we trusted other sources of similar or better validity, Team Galactic would have taken the place of Paul in Lake Acuity, and Ash's Torkoal would have evolved.

This is the internet. Just because it's there doesn't mean it's going to happen. Especially concerning anime.

Wikipedia is not the type of place you want to go for your information since they let a bunch of snotty-ass tards who lack a third grade education edit their so-called "information" and present it as real, factual information to the public.

It loses validity further when it's a desired topic of the fandom, such as Misty's return (or the inclusion of Riolu in Ash's team...how this is desirable for anyone to see Ash and Parachute Pants team up again is something I'll never understand).

Stick to Bulbapedia and Fanfiction.net for radical theories taken from the minds of 12 year-olds.
 
Jolene said:
I doubt they'll ever come back as permanent characters. It'll likely be one-off appearances every now and then as fanservice.
Click to expand...

You know, Brock left the show, and they could have easily kept him off the show, even though the fans demanded that they bring him back, yet they returned him to the main cast, so they can do the same to Misty, and as much as I hate to admit it, even May.
 
weedle_mchairybug said:
You know, Brock left the show, and they could have easily kept him off the show, even though the fans demanded that they bring him back, yet they returned him to the main cast, so they can do the same to Misty, and as much as I hate to admit it, even May.
Click to expand...

I think that was because the entire fanbase (literally, probably around 90%) preferred Brock to Tracy. As much as I'd like to see Misty back, the fact is that May and Dawn have equally large fanbases, making it an entirely different kettle of fish.
 
Screw the rules said:
I think that was because the entire fanbase (literally, probably around 90%) preferred Brock to Tracy. As much as I'd like to see Misty back, the fact is that May and Dawn have equally large fanbases, making it an entirely different kettle of fish.
Click to expand...

Actually, evidence shows that Misty's fanbase was probably much larger than people are led to believe (and that May and Dawn's fanbases may actually be smaller than led to believe: like for example, May's club is basically a dead zone, and Dawn doesn't even have a club dedicated to her, from what I heard.). That's also not even taking into account the fact that the anime's average ratings have sunk since Misty left, the sheer amount of petitions being circulated online and in real life trying to bring her back, and the Critical Reception on Misty's article, along with it's sources. (The Duke University Book/Essay Pikachu's Global Adventure: The Rise and Fall of Pokemon had stated that girls look up to and emulate Misty, and even hints that viewers of the same age have looked up to her as well ["Pikachu's Global Adventure additionally stated Misty also served as a source of non-threatening sexuality for both older and younger male viewers, though the context of such was presented in a more subtle for North American localizations of the series."]. The same book even admits that while the show does focus on Ash, Misty was a distinctly significant figure to the show's integrity, especially to female viewers. The book "The Japanification of Children's Popular Culture" mentions that she was an unusually complete girl in the cartoon world, and a nurturing component to the characters and "They Don't Like me: Lessons on Teasing and Bullying from a Preschool's Classroom" had mentioned that the girls look up to Misty and accepted her character (Something even Pikachu's Global Adventure had said.) A Study called "Pokemon: Exploring the Role of Gender" had reviewed it and said that kids respected Misty for her assertiveness and aggression, whileas college students respected her for her romance.). So far, nothing has been said about May and Dawn in regards to character roles.
 
Alright, lately if I'm down, I will turn to this thread and it puts a smile on my face. The fact that the Pokemon fandumb (I know how I spelled it) argues Bulbapedia as a credible sources indicates that following any wiki as law shows enough that the original wikipedia is not a great source of information. Right now, this very moment, I could go on wikipedia and change it to say Ash's father is Ho-oh and Thorton is actually Lauren Conrad from the Hills...and people would probably believe it and report it here.

In any case, I think Misty will return, but either in the Sinnoh League to watch Ash or when they return to Pallet (as they inevitably will). The writers, to please the fandumb, will probably make Tsundere McDaisy-dukes show up for like two episodes and leave. The question I have is will she have a forth generation pokemon? I mean it would be nice to see her with a Mantyke or something.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top