Pokemon that can be a gender, but shouldn't

Status
Not open for further replies.
I dont think Gardevior should be a male and I dont think Slowking should be a Female and for some odd reason, I always end up with a female Slowking....Machamp also should not be a female


:t354:TG
 
The Vanillas should be genderless... imo...

Of course, Mr. Mime should be a male only pokemon... well, duh?! Why is he called Mister in the first place..

I agree with Gothitelle and Gardevoir too.. From their looks, they should be females only.. Along with Machoke > Machamp and Timburr > Conkeldurr... They should be males only, its pretty akward to see them *beep* inside the daycare center with those looks...

The taekwondo brothers "Sawk and Throh" should be males only too..

Sigilyph should be genderless...

Misdreavus should be female only...

Emboar should have an alternate form when it is female.. Its pretty weird for a female Emboar to have a fire beard... *eww*
 
.Marion said:

Emboar should have an alternate form when it is female.. Its pretty weird for a female Emboar to have a fire beard... *eww*
Click to expand...


But you're fine with female Kadabras and Alakazams having mustaches(and beastly ones at that)?
 
Golden Warrior said:
On a different note: Why can KINGler, SlaKING, and SeaKING be female? Just the fact of having king in their name makes it sound weird to be female.
Click to expand...
'Cos they're known as Kingler, Kekking, and Azumao in the original Japanese versions.

.Marion said:

Of course, Mr. Mime should be a male only pokemon... well, duh?! Why is he called Mister in the first place..
Click to expand...
'Cos Mr. Mime's original Japanese name is Barrierd.
 
I associate nearly every Pokémon with a certain gender. For example, I think that a female Bulbasaur, Squirtle, or Charmander sounds strange. I also think that it's weird to have a male Torchic.
 
Gothitelle. said:
Hydregon does have a dainty, girlish appearance if you look at it. I mean the color sceme and the charm gives it away :p
Click to expand...

My male Hydreigon, Richthofen, says "guten tag!".

Anyway, Hydreigon doesn't look dainty in the least, and I don't see how black, blue, and red is a "girlish" color scheme. And "charm"? The thing looks pure evil, for Arceus' sake!
And, honestly, this thing is basically the opposite of dainty. It looks horribly vicious and evil. If you don't believe me, tell me how exactly this is dainty:

[PokeCommunity.com] Pokemon that can be a gender, but shouldn't
 
Just because a pokemon looks feminine or masculine in your eyes doesn't mean it HAS to be a certain gender.

The Machop line seemed perfectly fine to be multigender to me, that's just the way the Pokemon evolved. Both genders had to develop bigger muscles? The breasts flattened and formed into pecs instead. Technically, it's fine.

Gardevoir and Lopunny do look way too feminine with figure and technically, there's no reason a male should have hips like that o_o that's not physiologically right at all. I don't know why Pokemon does this but they seem to think they must be both genders. *sigh* It feels just like common sense, how could they overlook that?! D:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top