Spikey-Eared Pichu
Pichu-pi!
- 1,016
- Posts
- 15
- Years
- My house
- Seen Feb 11, 2012
Good couple of responses here.
IMO, a Pokemon's looks play a big part of its possibility of being on my team. Take, for example, Floatzel. In Platinum, if I ever chose Chimchar or Turtwig, I'd have to have a Water-Type. Floatzel has decent stats, not a terrible movepool, and is Water-Type. BUT, I absolutely hate its appearance! For this reason, I have actually gone out of my way to trade a Piplup, spend hours catching a Mild-natured Feebas, or even deal with Magikarp to use as my Water-type because I despise the designs of both Floatzel and Gastrodon (The only GOOD Water-Types in the game aside from Gyarados, Milotic, and Empoleon.)
I've done similar things for Fire, Grass, Electric, Psychic, Dark, and Ghost-Types. As you can see, a Pokemon's appearance is important to me because I like my team to be elegant and look awesome. At the same time, I don't use a good-looking Pokemon if its stats fail. A healthy mixture of appeal and strength, all around, everytime.
IMO, a Pokemon's looks play a big part of its possibility of being on my team. Take, for example, Floatzel. In Platinum, if I ever chose Chimchar or Turtwig, I'd have to have a Water-Type. Floatzel has decent stats, not a terrible movepool, and is Water-Type. BUT, I absolutely hate its appearance! For this reason, I have actually gone out of my way to trade a Piplup, spend hours catching a Mild-natured Feebas, or even deal with Magikarp to use as my Water-type because I despise the designs of both Floatzel and Gastrodon (The only GOOD Water-Types in the game aside from Gyarados, Milotic, and Empoleon.)
I've done similar things for Fire, Grass, Electric, Psychic, Dark, and Ghost-Types. As you can see, a Pokemon's appearance is important to me because I like my team to be elegant and look awesome. At the same time, I don't use a good-looking Pokemon if its stats fail. A healthy mixture of appeal and strength, all around, everytime.