HellishHades said:
Hey Hellish Hades, have you used a PSP?
I dont want to hear a 'No, but its just a laptop omg, I'm anti sony I'll get crappy ports on my PC' answer.
Just a yes, or a no.
Yes. Straight from Nippon.
The quality of PC ports is a choice, since enivitably, the maximum quality option on a game will be better on a PC than a console. If you choose to buy a rubbish PC, then that's another matter.
Kairi said:
You defy yourself. You have already acknowledged you don?t like the PS2 at all. Thus your opinion on what are ?good games? is not to be held even in the state of an opinion, much less fact. You can not claim the ?good? games are ports, because you do not believe there are good games.
Your defy yourself. I challenge you to find an instance of my saying "all PS2 games are rubbish", or something along that line.
HellishHades said:
Most good games released on Playstation2 hardware had ports to PC games. Insofar, the previous also holds true to PSP games -- as announced. So, that laptop that's already used for countless things can also be used for games.
Note how I used inclusive words like "most", whereas you use exclusive words, like "at all", to reference what I said. It seems as though you have baises of your own: either toard me, or the PSP. I do not care to which it is. Regardless, I did not say that
all PS2 games are rubbish.
Kairi said:
Untested play mechanics are a..I?m sorry, the primary push of the DS. That?s called setting down on a not firm foundation. It usually doesn?t work out well. The only games that even feasibly use these features, at the moment, feel like shallow tech demos, that no real gamer or kid will get a large amount of playtime out of. So the DS?s inferior hardware thus longer lasting battery doesn?t even really matter, then.
How do you suggest creating innovation? You cannot test such features on a large scale without revealing said features to your competitors. Nor can you see the sorts of things developers will be able to do with the device unless you actually
create it. I'd rather have the video game industry be pushed forward by things new and creative, rather than simply increasing processing power of a device and putting it in a smaller package.
Kairi said:
If you touch a PSP?s screen, it won?t do anything EITHER. Get freaking real. This is called blowing things out of proportion. Sure, the PSP?s screen is more fragile than the DS. But implying you touch it and it causes damage is ridiculous. Keep your extreme bias on a leash for a second to realize how unrealistic your comments are before you send.
Methinks your bias comes through while interpreting what I have said and blowing it out of proportion.
Kairi said:
Also, funny. You encourage us to use full-sized discs, when Nintendo is the only one on the console market not doing just that. Which console sells the worst again? I forgot. ^_^
This is also funny. You assume that I fully support Nintendo Gamecube, et al, without my saying so. Which console has more processing power than the other two, uses full-sized discs, and has a big "X" on the front? T'is my pick.
Brittany said:
She never had anything against you, she just told you to be more polite about a certain topic, especially when it's the topic of the thread.
I already quoted the first sentence of the topic. The quote clearly illustrates anti-PSP sentiments. Which belongs less in the thread: comments that endorse or criticise the PSP in a topic that started by doing the latter?