Alexander18
Banned
- 1,393
- Posts
- 7
- Years
- NZ
- Seen Dec 29, 2017
I respectfully disagree. I don't believe in indirect sequels. B2W2 are the only legit sequels that i seen so far. My opinion but we can have different opinions on the matter.
-
Ever thought it'd be cool to have your art, writing, or challenge runs featured on PokéCommunity? Click here for info - we'd love to spotlight your work!
-
PokéCommunity's Easter Egg Hunt is now on! If you're interested in looking for some eggs and earning badges, click here!
-
Our weekly protagonist poll is now up! Vote for your favorite Conquest protagonist in the poll by clicking here.
Sequels or Remakes?
- Thread starter Abby
- Start date
Unown Seer
Earnest
- 179
- Posts
- 15
- Years
- Seen Dec 6, 2020
An alternate timeline doesn't a sequel make. But we could have SM characters show up as Fallers.
But I wouldn't take it for granted that the story differences will be that major. Things like Kukui giving the player a starter instead of Hala are, well, a gimmick. The climax will be different, but that was already the case for Emerald and Platinum; Emerald incorporated aspects from both Ruby and Sapphire, which had alternate stories to begin with. Was that comparable to a sequel? Nope.
But I wouldn't take it for granted that the story differences will be that major. Things like Kukui giving the player a starter instead of Hala are, well, a gimmick. The climax will be different, but that was already the case for Emerald and Platinum; Emerald incorporated aspects from both Ruby and Sapphire, which had alternate stories to begin with. Was that comparable to a sequel? Nope.
Last edited: