- 4,222
- Posts
- 20
- Years
- Seen Aug 11, 2009
Frostweaver said:How's Mirror Force more powerful than Torrential Tribute in anyway that one is banned yet the other isn't? You can force activate your own Torrential Tribute by summoning a Sangan, then wipe all of their field clear. Torrential can destroy monsters upon summoning. It is more flexible than Mirror Force because it can be activated outside of battle phase. Mirror Force has the advantage that it only destroys opponents' monsters, but it is much easier to be disarmed in comparison to Torrential Tribute. Either both are gone, or both are limited to 1, and people probably want both of them to stay.
Bounder is an automatic -1 in card advantage, and a -1 for field presense too. Reaper can run into him and not die, basically using 1500 LP to clear your monster. If it's a tomato, then it's even worse... ram into bounder to receive damage, clear your field, call out the don to take out your hand next time. You see how this thing is pretty flawed? Back then there's no other light monster so it's relatively powerful. Now that we got some options for light food that doesn't say "-1 me or more at the cost of LP!" we can really bring him back.
How's Tribe that strong if there's no serpent to abuse it? It's a constant -1 if you want to use the effect, and we don't use Lightning Vortex for a reason... Tribe is basically a weakened Lightning Vortex that can be reused and also contribute to field presense. As long as there's no infinite fuel, tribe should stay.
Witch can search for a lot, but most of the time it'll be searching for tribute monsters, which really need some help. No one plays tribute because "OH MY GOODNESS THAT'S ANOTHER -1" well we can solve this problem if we have more powerful tribute food, like sangan and witch. If we succeed in getting rid of the broken stuff so witch can't search for them and forces witch to search for the proper stuff, then witch isn't that bad at all.
Obviously for me...
1. Torrential leaves you open too, like for your opponent's face-down Sangan to fetch a Don to attack you with next turn, or use that face-down CotH to hit you with a previously-destroyed beatstick. Sure, there are a couple more cards to deal with Mirror Force, but it's still worth it to not have to worry about your monsters disappearing, too.
2. If you're thinking about advantage, then yeah, I guess it's not that good...but then again, in that context neither is Chaos Emperor Dragon (get rid of everything just in time for your opponent to topdeck that (RotA for) Blade Knight/GAF and smack you with a solid 2000+)...it's about having a bit of revenge...and hey, it's better than nothing. Plus, it's an automatic minimum of 1700 damage, no matter how you look at it, and if your opponent doesn't have that much LP, then...GG. Anyway, even with your scenarios, it isn't an unlimitable card--it's a lot like an easier-to-reuse Magic Cylinder.
3. Yeah, a weakened Lightning Vortex...that's like saying (as much as I hate to admit it) Breaker is a weakened MST. Look at how many people use Breaker, a card that CANNOT be reused very easily, then think how many more would use it if it were reusable, and...you get the idea. Plus, you can decide not to destroy one of their monsters if you don't want to--for a follow-up Snatch Steal, for example--or you can get rid of monsters on your side of the field that you don't want anymore...granted, there aren't as many examples of this right now (Lava Golem is the only one I can think of off the top of my head), but once cards like BLAST SPHERE finally show up, it won't seem so dumb.
4. No, not just tribute monsters. The real threat behind it is its power to bring out beatsticks like GAF, GEAF, Lei Lei, TRIBE, REFLECT BOUNDER, etc. without having to worry about some damaging side effect. BTW, making tributes -1 advantage was A PART OF THE REASON to ban Witch. You said it yourself; Witch can search for a lot. And that's why it's too powerful not to be banned.
Now, I'm not trying to say that you're an idiot or anything--actually, you brought up some good points--but that doesn't change the fact that UDE doesn't see it that way, and they're the ones making the banlists.