TCG Daily Chit Chat

That Deck doesn't work. Too much Dark World. Dark World is not the way to go with Raviel, Lord of Phantasms at all. Check this out.

Hamon, Lord of Striking Thunder
Uria, Lord of Searing Flames
Raviel, Lord of Phantasms
Sangan
Magician of Faith
Magician of Faith
Giant Germ
Giant Germ
Giant Germ
Morphing Jar
Breaker the Magical Warrior
Newdoria
Newdoria
Slate Warrior
Slate Warrior
Malice Doll of Demise
Malice Doll of Demise
Spirit Reaper
Goblin Elite Attack Force
Goblin Elite Attack Force
Graceful Charity
Ectoplasmer
Ectoplasmer
Nobleman of Crossout
Nobleman of Crossout
Giant Trunade
Giant Trunade
Giant Trunade
Snatch Steal
Premature Burial
Gravekeeper's Servant
Gravekeeper's Servant
Gravekeeper's Servant
Call of the Haunted
Mirror Force
Pole Position
Pole Position
Royal Decree
Royal Decree
Robbin' Goblin
 
Interesting build. The burn is nice with the deck. Clear field, direct attack. I'm not realy sure on deree though.
 
Royal Decree is there so that Trap Cards aren't a problem. Uria, Lord of Searing Flames requires three face-up, not necessarily active Trap Cards to be sent from my side of the field to the Graveyard to be Special Summoned. How would you feel if you just called out a Sacred Beast and attacked, only to run into a Mirror Force or Sakuretsu Armor?
 
I am aware of Uria's cost for it's summoning. But mabye your should try a triple decree combo. A third decree instead of pole poistion. But I'm not sure on why Truande. A MST would be helpful.
 
I can't believe I missed Mystical Space Typhoon. Let's say I add that and a third Royal Decree, then take out Pole Position and a Gravekeeper's Servant to Side Deck with 13 other cards?
 
Waker of Chaos said:
I can't believe I missed Mystical Space Typhoon. Let's say I add that and a third Royal Decree, then take out Pole Position and a Gravekeeper's Servant to Side Deck with 13 other cards?
Click to expand...
I guess that can work. But what is your side deck? I would Take out a Giant Truande for the Mystical Space Typhoon since you have Decree for S/T(basicall traps) protection.
 
I have yet to figure out a Side Deck, and I'm not sure if I should take out a Giant Trunade.
 
Waker of Chaos said:
That Deck doesn't work. Too much Dark World. Dark World is not the way to go with Raviel, Lord of Phantasms at all. Check this out.

Hamon, Lord of Striking Thunder
Uria, Lord of Searing Flames
Raviel, Lord of Phantasms
Sangan
Magician of Faith
Magician of Faith
Giant Germ
Giant Germ
Giant Germ
Morphing Jar
Breaker the Magical Warrior
Newdoria
Newdoria
Slate Warrior
Slate Warrior
Malice Doll of Demise
Malice Doll of Demise
Spirit Reaper
Goblin Elite Attack Force
Goblin Elite Attack Force
Graceful Charity
Ectoplasmer
Ectoplasmer
Nobleman of Crossout
Nobleman of Crossout
Giant Trunade
Giant Trunade
Giant Trunade
Snatch Steal
Premature Burial
Gravekeeper's Servant
Gravekeeper's Servant
Gravekeeper's Servant
Call of the Haunted
Mirror Force
Pole Position
Pole Position
Royal Decree
Royal Decree
Robbin' Goblin
Click to expand...

...You want to complain about me criticizing your cards? Then practice what you preach: DON'T INSULT MY DECKS. It works quite well, thank you.

Besides, you're using my idea of the Giant Germs and Royal Decree.

Oh, and how is Dark World NOT so good for Raviel? It gets fiends out on the field fast, which there isn't anything major in your deck to do (except the Giant Germs, but that was my idea, so...).

Now, what else...Ectoplasmer doesn't work, Newdoria's too weak to survive, Giant Trunade in 3's wll give you dead hands (as well as force your traps back down again)...I could go on, but why bother?
 
What you perceive so blithely as an insult was actually advice. If you're going to use Raviel, Lord of Phantasms on his own, then go ahead and use Dark World. If you're going to use all three Sacred Beasts in one Deck, my Deck is superior to yours, period. Ectoplasmer works with Malice Doll of Demise, but if you knew that, you would have mentioned it. I've playtested this Deck so many times, and I have never, ever lost.

Now, a word of advice. Run before the mods ban you, because I've just reported you for flaming.
 
He doesn't have to run. He wasn't flaming. He was giving legitimate criticism. >>
 
As far as I'm concerned, that's an example of flaming. Ban him, or at least force him to leave me the hell alone.
 
Sleepless Shadows said:
Hey i'm joining this convo if you guys dont mind me joining?
If you dont want me to i shall go back to my haunted house lol MWAHAHAHA
Click to expand...
You can just post. You don't need to ask. As long you stay on topic.

Waker of Chaos & Ichapokemr: Both of your decks are of the same theme but are constructed different ways. If it works for both of you then there is no need to aurge over it.
 
My original idea was a Spatial Collapsing approach, but this build that I posted works better. I found that out by Dueling.

So, Ichapokemr, I challenge you to a Duel on the YVD. The winner of the Match has the better build.
 
Waker of Chaos said:
My original idea was a Spatial Collapsing approach, but this build that I posted works better. I found that out by Dueling.

So, Ichapokemr, I challenge you to a Duel on the YVD. The winner of the Match has the better build.
Click to expand...
The Ojama Trio + Nightmare Wheel burn ? I saw it. It was nicely built.

You two have Yahoo so why won't both of you try that. YVD is a bit slow for me.
 
No. If I'm going to Duel online, I'll only use the YVD. That way, he can't cheat.
 
I know this is a bit off topic but do you guys have any idea why Cyber Jar was place on the ban list in April? I don't see anything wrong with the use of Cyber Jar. It not as broken as Monster Reborn.
 
charizard_maa said:
I know this is a bit off topic but do you guys have any idea why Cyber Jar was place on the ban list in April? I don't see anything wrong with the use of Cyber Jar. It not as broken as Monster Reborn.
Click to expand...

(note: not talking about the jar OTK)

It got a dark hole effect embedded within it, and you cannot avoid the mass clear field unless you do happen to have the NoC or Ceasefire with you. This effect allows you to get even on the established field advantage by wiping the field completely, and restarts the field by providing both sides with some new monsters. On top of that, it draws you some new cards as you keep the s/t that you draw to replenish your hand.

In some various lucky situations, its power can greatly surpass that of Monster Reborn, especially if you flip it on your turn. Flip it your turn to call up more attacks or tribute fodders. Since all of this is special summon due to cyber jar's effect, you can still summon, most likely a tribute monster like Airknight, Chaos Sorcerer or Zaborg to further press on the sudden huge increase in advantage. Flipping cyber jar on your own turn usually guarantees you with a super monstrious field on your side, and it's more than likely that you can sucessfully wipe out everything that your opponent got from cyber jar's effect.


Then of course, there's always the jar otk. Personally I think Konami banned cyber jar due to the jar otk rather than its dramatic field clearing effect, seeing how they are targetting every single card in a ftk/strong otk combo possible. But, I think that cyber jar is one of those ones that deserve to be banned anyway, unlike poor, poor Time Seal...

Do they honestly need to kill Time Seal as well as Drop Off *after* Victory Dragon is already gone? >>;
 
Yes, they did need to Forbid both Drop Off and Time Seal. Victory Dragon's not the only card that works with that combination.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top