I used to be much more blonder-er back in '03/04 so a slip once in awhile isn't going to kill anyone ;D
/me is signing up to ladygaga.com so he can watch the video when it premiers.
I did the same thing a few days ago! : 3
I used to be much more blonder-er back in '03/04 so a slip once in awhile isn't going to kill anyone ;D
/me is signing up to ladygaga.com so he can watch the video when it premiers.
DON'T TEASE ME!
It was on WIKIPEDIA so it MUST BE TRUE!!
Haha. Wikipedia does actually have an amazing accuracy rate for what it is though. I give it props.I edited your post to make it true.
I have never found something false on Wikipedia, but I also barely use it.
Haha. Wikipedia does actually have an amazing accuracy rate for what it is though. I give it props.
Dealing with wikinerds though... whole nother story :x HATE THEM!
Haha. Wikipedia does actually have an amazing accuracy rate for what it is though. I give it props.
Dealing with wikinerds though... whole nother story :x HATE THEM!
I have never found something false on Wikipedia, but I also barely use it.
Holy ****, you have 12,222 posts.
I didn't swear, I just put the little stars. : 3No swearing please and thank you.
And some professors ask that you don't use Wikipedia for papers/projects in their class. It's actually a really big debate in the academia world right now over the use of Wikipedia in research.
But, the fact of the matter is, most of the times Wikipedia is more factual than false. ):No swearing please and thank you.
And some professors ask that you don't use Wikipedia for papers/projects in their class. It's actually a really big debate in the academia world right now over the use of Wikipedia in research.
How is that bypassing the censor? It's the exact same thing the censor would show.That's still censor bypassing and still breaking the rules.
:3
Yes, but my point is that I would get in trouble for swearing, not censor bypass. D:ugh
I don't know how many times I've explained this rule to someone on this forum in my time as staff.
You still swore. It's still against the rules. Just because those cute wittle stars come up doesn't mean you can swear. That's not what they're there for. They don't give you free reign to say whatever you want. ~_~
They should just be glad Wikipedia is a readable source! =_=;
Difficult, because I am a "blonde" and it is hard for me to get things right off the bat sometimes. D:ಠ_ಠ
You knew what I meant ctep. Why must you always be so difficult and annoying?
Because most other sources are complicated, irrelevant, specialized, incomplete, questionable, too old, and endless problems and dissatisfactions that make them not worth reading.And why should they be glad? o.O I can only see them being glad if it wasn't. ;_;
First of all, who is "they"? The professors?
Well, I cant see any reason why you would question that as well. After all, that's not what I said. ; 3Totally valid reasoning. How silly of me to question "because I feel like it." Astounding. Amazing. Etc.