Dark Piplup
This user title is original
- 304
- Posts
- 14
- Years
- Texas
- Seen Aug 2, 2012
They should cut down on legendaries. 13! I think some of them were pointless.
you can never ever have too many legendary pokemon :)
*facepalm*To be honest, when looking at Unova's selection for legendaries, I really miss Sinnoh. It seemed like there were just too few this time around. I'm not saying that I'm all for overpowered Pokemon or anything of the sort, but I think that going into a new area for the purpose of catching a one-in-a-kind Pokemon added a little bit of extra depth. In B/W, you have the 3 musketeers, Kyurem, Volcarona, Victini, and a single wanderer (with the exception of Landorus). I just don't feel like that's really enough!
The thing people aren't realizing is that it doesn't matter if there are 5 million normal pokemon or just one. The fact that there are 47 alleged "special" pokemon ruins it. Legendary Pokemon can only be legendary when there are 10 or less.Well, in theory there is ALOT more normal Pokémon than Legendaries, so it kinda balances out.
Cresselia and heatran were kinda pointless in my opinion.
Legendary Pokemon can only be legendary when there are 10 or less.