• Ever thought it'd be cool to have your art, writing, or challenge runs featured on PokéCommunity? Click here for info - we'd love to spotlight your work!
  • Dawn, Gloria, Juliana, or Summer - which Pokémon protagonist is your favorite? Let us know by voting in our poll!
  • Welcome to PokéCommunity! Register now and join one of the best fan communities on the 'net to talk Pokémon and more! We are not affiliated with The Pokémon Company or Nintendo.

What's the deal with the latest gen?

  • 11
    Posts
    17
    Years
    • Seen Feb 1, 2008
    Why does it seem as though everyone hates lots of the newest additions? I don't think they look THAT bad, and while some of them do seem to look like they're less pokemon-ish to me, it could've been worse. I'm not sticking up for any blatant stupidity on nintendo's behalf, but I seem to have no problem with this gen. Honestly, it's not my favorite, but it's not really all as bad as it seems.. Being a pokemon fan, I'm just happy that I have more pokemon to look for. Gives me more to do when I'm bored.

    By the way, I could care less about who you are or how creative you are, I'm telling you now that you can't exactly pull 1,000 totally unique creatures out of your rear without having quite a few that look similar.

    And, it actually makes sense to have pokemon that have similar body structures. You could say that they're just lazy, and that could be true. But, honestly, I'd be as lazy as anyone else.. Dogs look like dogs, cats look like cats. If you were god, and were going to systematically create sub-species, the dogs would look different but would have the same overall main qualities that a dog has.

    Apply this to any animal-based pokemon. The non-animal-based pokemon are mostly original and different looking, unless you can point some out for me.

    Hell, think about it realistically as I do if you have to; Most species of fish (example) have the same body structure, just different appearances. Lapras and Gastrodon are of a similar species grouping, therefore they'd have the same structure.

    I mean, you wouldn't have a sea slug with legs and arms shooting water out of it's ass while another one looks like a blob with a shell and squishy studs for it's arms/legs if they're supposed to be relatives. :s

    One final thing.. I keep hearing some people that say that they shouldn't add completely new pokemon in the next version. Someone actually said something along the lines of "I don't want pokemon to change into a completely different game"... I strongly disagree. Why have three or four new pokemon games where you catch the same 400 pokemon? No new ones? I'd just finish my pearl and be done with the game since I already have them all..

    Sorry for the ranting. If you're going to flame me for whatever unecessarily moronic reason, then leave this thread.
     
    Why does it seem as though everyone hates lots of the newest additions? I don't think they look THAT bad, and while some of them do seem to look like they're less pokemon-ish to me, it could've been worse. I'm not sticking up for any blatant stupidity on nintendo's behalf, but I seem to have no problem with this gen. Honestly, it's not my favorite, but it's not really all as bad as it seems.. Being a pokemon fan, I'm just happy that I have more pokemon to look for. Gives me more to do when I'm bored.
    Agreed.
    I remember when the evolotions of Magmar, Magneton, Lickitung, etc. were revealed, and everyone was ranting about how absolultley ugly they looked and how Game Freak should've made them better.
    I don't mind the designs; the Pokemon look pretty good to me.

    One final thing.. I keep hearing some people that say that they shouldn't add completely new pokemon in the next version. Someone actually said something along the lines of "I don't want pokemon to change into a completely different game"... I strongly disagree. Why have three or four new pokemon games where you catch the same 400 pokemon? No new ones? I'd just finish my pearl and be done with the game since I already have them all...
    Hmmm. I haven't heard anything like that. I think that's rather dumb, as one of the best things about a new Pokemon game are the new Pokemon, IMO.

    I think Pokemon should stay the same in terms of storyline, but change slightly in gameplay, such as battling.
    I wouldn't really like it if the series took a major change, like turning into a first-person shooter. ._.

    I agree with you on most terms though.
     
    Last edited:
    Why does it seem as though everyone hates lots of the newest additions? I don't think they look THAT bad, and while some of them do seem to look like they're less pokemon-ish to me, it could've been worse.

    Your right, some of them do look dumb, tey shoul make some redesigns in the next gen before more fans complain about how they look.
     
    I remember when the evolotions of Magmar, Magneton, Lickitung, etc. were revealed, and everyone was ranting about how absolultley ugly they looked and how Game Freak should've made them better.
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    I'm in support of 4th gen pokemon but I do believe the evolutions from them three are terrible. [Especially Magmortar]
     
    i dont have a problem with the new pokemon in this generation. the only thing i have a problem with is the new voice of ash.. but thats beside the point. i agree with what you are trying to say.
     
    Well, at least some people agree with me. :p

    By the way, in the next gen, some of the newer pokemon that people may not like might be revamped anyways, so they may look better. Who knows..
     
    I dont like how magmortar looks at all how did he get from cool magmar to a really fat one with cannons for arms?

    but porygon-Z is awesome , and tangrowth is cool :P
     
    Back
    Top