it doesn't matter if I'm wrong or not what matters is that's what I believe in, you don't kick people around in the ass for there believes, God our heavenly father says to let people believe what they want to, and don't be mean just cause they don't believe in what you believe
I'm just curious, though. If you don't want us to voice
our opinions about
yours, then what exactly do you want us to
do here? =/
That said, a few things I'd like to point out. Mostly, even if it
is shiny (and I'm not saying that it is -- *motions to the proof the others have brought up*), that really doesn't make it special for the following reasons:
1. Shininess hasn't really had an effect on stats since the reworking of the system in Gen III. Even then, in GSC, the IVs that determined shininess weren't necessarily the best IVs a Pokemon could possibly have.
2. Given everyone's reaction to Ash's Noctowl (which
is shiny) from the episode it was caught in onward, I don't think people make too much of a big deal about it. Yeah, you've got the initial, "Hey! That's an unusually colored Pokemon!" (Which happens again with pretty much every shiny in the anime as far as I know. Correct me if I'm wrong, please?) But other than that, nothing. If Ash's Pikachu is special
because it's shiny, the characters may not actually care.
3. Going back up to a point I loosely covered with #2, but if Pikachu happened to be an alternately colored Pokemon, it's a little strange that no one seemed to notice yet. As in, there's no "Hey! That's an unusually colored Pokemon!" There
was, meanwhile, for the pink Butterfree, if I recall correctly. And then, of course, there was for the known shinies in the show as well.
So, yes. *shrug* Having an opinion's fine and dandy, but to go this defensive on everyone else for calling you out on an inaccurate statement (which was originally presented as fact or theory) is a little strange, given that this is a discussion. That and you don't seem to present any evidence yourself (or take the time to really consider canon), yet previously, you stated people were shooting down your opinion without proof. All I'm saying is you may want to sit down and really think things through or at least try to argue against what we're presenting if you want to defend your opinion.