- 153
- Posts
- 15
- Years
- A city somehwere IN AMERICA
- Seen Oct 25, 2009
The question is as stated. There are two arguments for this, and I'll present them:
NO!: The only reason that Gen. 2 introduced steels and darks was to balance out the Psychic type. Any new types would be extremely redundant and possibly unbalanced; making it so that there would be too many to keep track of when considering dual types.
YES!: New types would spicen up the games a bit, and provide hundreds of ideas for new Pokemon that could fit for them. And GameFreak knows what they're doing, they'll make sure that the new types are balanced and not go crazy with dual type alignments.
I tried to make both arguments fair, although I'm a bit biased because I saw yes to new types. Still, what do you all think?
EDIT: For some reason it's not making a poll, so unless anyone knows a way to add a poll to a pre-existing thread the results can't be tallied. Sorry NGOL(nervous giggle out loud).
NO!: The only reason that Gen. 2 introduced steels and darks was to balance out the Psychic type. Any new types would be extremely redundant and possibly unbalanced; making it so that there would be too many to keep track of when considering dual types.
YES!: New types would spicen up the games a bit, and provide hundreds of ideas for new Pokemon that could fit for them. And GameFreak knows what they're doing, they'll make sure that the new types are balanced and not go crazy with dual type alignments.
I tried to make both arguments fair, although I'm a bit biased because I saw yes to new types. Still, what do you all think?
EDIT: For some reason it's not making a poll, so unless anyone knows a way to add a poll to a pre-existing thread the results can't be tallied. Sorry NGOL(nervous giggle out loud).