Would you like to see six vs. six battles?

[Princess Diana]

As long as they aren't rotational.

 

[Kahisys]

6 vs 6's way too much. It's already quite a mess with 3 vs 3, and I really don't imagine more Pokemon into a single battle.

 

[Treecko]

I don't think a 6v6 battle could fit on the screen that well. It would end up looking too messy. 3 v 3 is already pretty complicated and so 6 vs 6 would be even more hectic.

 

[mikey]

No way. It would be way too crowded and complicated. I think that 3 on 3 is the most that should be done.

 

[Iceshadow3317]

I don't like the idea about 6 on 6. 3 on 3 are annoying enough. Don't think I'd lke 6 on 6 at all. But I do love 2 on 2.

 

[Ho-Oh]

Competitively... it'd suck kind of. It'd involve SO much more effort. However, it could be kind of interesting, though. Just thinking of the strategy involved means items and speed of Pokemon take on much greater importance than before. I mean a few moves will probably have to have their effects changed for 6v6 to kick off but... I guess I'd prefer leaving it as is!

 

[chella182]

Nah, I think it would be too much. Like the poster above me said, the 3v3 ones can be taxing enough at times, I wouldn't be able to concentrate on 6v6.

 

[Sydian]

I love doubles and triples, but sextuples would...well that'd just be too much **** to keep up with.

 

[TwilightBlade]

That would be too chaotic to control and too difficult to strategically prepare for. >.< I don't even like triple battles much since it's easy to gang up on the middle target, which definitelyyy dies in 3 hits, lol. Doubles were just fine.