- 1,225
- Posts
- 18
- Years
- Age 29
- he/him/his
- Seen Jun 12, 2024
Sorry to sound rude but this is absolutely ridiculous. S&M has three perfectly capable and intelligent mods yet what has there been to moderate? All of, what, 4 posts in the last 12 hours? S&M has really experienced both ends of the spectrum, ranging from having a single very lenient moderator to a dynamic group of three moderators, all of whom believe that PC should be as clean cut as possible. Sounds nice. What's the problem?
PC ISN'T SMOGON
Yeah, I'll admit, it'd be cool to have an elite group of raters and battlers, but just to have an elitist group of 3 or 4 people rating each other's teams with no final goal in mind. I'm not saying it's progressed this far yet but it's well on its way.
It's obvious that S&M had flaws before. People failed to follow forum-wide rules, like "no flaming", "no spamming" and "no trolling". But that doesn't mean we have to force it to the opposite pole and make it just boring for members. I'd like to go through each of the rules individually.
→ Follow all PokéCommunity Rules
Yeah no duh.
→ Do NOT rate without proper knowledge
This rule is subjective and pretty pointless. There is a pretty indefinite continuum of battling/rating knowledge and where each person lies shouldn't be decided upon by the moderators. There are obviously such things as terrible rates, but those are spam anyway. If a rate is subpar, it will simply be corrected and the rater can learn from it. No reason to infract for it.
→ When you make suggestions, back them up with REASON
Yeah this is a pretty decent rule actually. This should stay.
→ Be DETAILED with your suggestions
This is completely unecessary. The last rule covers any rates that are not descriptive enough. If you supply an adequate reason and a clear suggestion it's "detailed" enough.
→ You MUST include description and general summary
This rule is pretty solid, but it's never enforced so whatever. It's incredibly pointless because people will just bypass the rule by stating obvious information, and we can't expect people to get too far into the logistics of their team. After all, this isn't Smogon.
→ "Ew, Heatran? You're not being original!"
Actually most of the comments are more about being predictable/unpredictable but yeah most of these are SPAM. But a thread just filled with six standard movesets that have no synergy is just as SPAMmy.
→ This forum is NOT for number rates
This has always been a S&M rule and I believe firmly in it.
→ Teams must consist of SIX Pokémon
On its own this rule is decent but see the rule below for more info.**
→ This is a COMPETITIVE Pokémon forum
This is completely lol. The name of the forum is Pokemon Strategies & Movesets. Now tell me how using 6 Plusle in-game is an effective strategy. Then I'd like the S&M mods to attempt this feat while doing push ups during the elite 4. It's not that easy and extremely inexperienced members need to start somewhere. We've provided nowhere for them to become informed. And we need newer members becoming more experienced to allow the forum to thrive.
As I've already stated, I think it would be amazing to have an exclusively competitive battling population inside the S&M forum... but we don't even have 2% of the number of willing members needed to facilitate that sort of thing. We're not Smogon and we need to quit trying to be exactly like them.
You guys remember aragornbird, right? Well, he thoroughly enjoyed competitive battle but he didn't appear to have any problem helping out inexperienced players so long as they weren't incredibly rude. And he's on Smogon now. If you don't like helping inexperienced players then you should join him there.
And what about those casual players out there? I used to be one myself. Luckily I could post casual RMTs without being yelled at. If I were just getting situated into the competitve scene now, I'd have to go elsewhere.
**And what about Battle Frontier teams? Some of the buildings in the frontier require further coordination than even competitive battle does. And are you suggesting that I could glide through with 6, or in this case, 3 Plusle? I nearly ruined my keyboard after all of the water I just spit on it.
Considering the activity hovering around -273 degrees Celcius (harharhar) this rule is seriously tampering with the growth of the rating/battling population on our site.
→ Teams are REQUIRED to list EVs, Items, Natures, Ability (if it has more than one) and the obvious four moves
Wow. Wow. Well this would be pretty useful if PC were a competitive battle community but since we're not on Smogon we should stop acting like it.
→ Titles
→ Recommended Format
These are pretty essential suggestions. Good job friends.
→ Use the STICKIES to your ADVANTAGE
The stickies are pretty pointless and just reiterate the information that can be immediately found on Smogon. And do I really need to repeat myself again?
→ Use proper grammar and spelling
Good rule.
→ Formatting Issues
Terrible and subjective rule. Leaves room for blatant favoring of members and just adds to the endless list of things that members have to worry about before submitting their thread. And you know what's really ugly? A RMT that has no pictures and is written in the same exact font, color, and format throughout.
→ Learn to take criticism.
This rule is entirely pointless. If a criticism is truly helpful then a member will either accept it automatically or break an already established rule replying to it anyway. Adding unecessary rules really makes the rule thread tl;dr and repetitive.
→ "AH! WHERE IS MY THREAD!?" | Have some PATIENCE
This rule is god awful. There isn't enough activity to warrant thread approval, and there shouldn't be so many god forsaken rules that an open ended discussion forum like S&M should require thread approval. And Battle Logs certainly doesn't need it... do you see threads awaiting approval in the writing forums?
This just frustrates people and allows threads to sink to the second page before they are even approved. Not that the latter is important right now, considering the surge in activity going on.
→ Simplicity is key
Who made this rule? I mean I am pretty sure I know, and this is a rhetorical question, so don't answer, but it's just another pointless restriction. And once again, subjective. Please tell me in one sentence why CSS should be against the S&M rules.
Anyway that's my case, and before you reply just go look at the amazingly high number of posts that have occurred in S&M recently. Remember, there's no need for a second Smogon and there aren't enough active participants to create one.
PC ISN'T SMOGON
Yeah, I'll admit, it'd be cool to have an elite group of raters and battlers, but just to have an elitist group of 3 or 4 people rating each other's teams with no final goal in mind. I'm not saying it's progressed this far yet but it's well on its way.
It's obvious that S&M had flaws before. People failed to follow forum-wide rules, like "no flaming", "no spamming" and "no trolling". But that doesn't mean we have to force it to the opposite pole and make it just boring for members. I'd like to go through each of the rules individually.
→ Follow all PokéCommunity Rules
Yeah no duh.
→ Do NOT rate without proper knowledge
This rule is subjective and pretty pointless. There is a pretty indefinite continuum of battling/rating knowledge and where each person lies shouldn't be decided upon by the moderators. There are obviously such things as terrible rates, but those are spam anyway. If a rate is subpar, it will simply be corrected and the rater can learn from it. No reason to infract for it.
→ When you make suggestions, back them up with REASON
Yeah this is a pretty decent rule actually. This should stay.
→ Be DETAILED with your suggestions
This is completely unecessary. The last rule covers any rates that are not descriptive enough. If you supply an adequate reason and a clear suggestion it's "detailed" enough.
→ You MUST include description and general summary
This rule is pretty solid, but it's never enforced so whatever. It's incredibly pointless because people will just bypass the rule by stating obvious information, and we can't expect people to get too far into the logistics of their team. After all, this isn't Smogon.
→ "Ew, Heatran? You're not being original!"
Actually most of the comments are more about being predictable/unpredictable but yeah most of these are SPAM. But a thread just filled with six standard movesets that have no synergy is just as SPAMmy.
→ This forum is NOT for number rates
This has always been a S&M rule and I believe firmly in it.
→ Teams must consist of SIX Pokémon
On its own this rule is decent but see the rule below for more info.**
→ This is a COMPETITIVE Pokémon forum
This is completely lol. The name of the forum is Pokemon Strategies & Movesets. Now tell me how using 6 Plusle in-game is an effective strategy. Then I'd like the S&M mods to attempt this feat while doing push ups during the elite 4. It's not that easy and extremely inexperienced members need to start somewhere. We've provided nowhere for them to become informed. And we need newer members becoming more experienced to allow the forum to thrive.
As I've already stated, I think it would be amazing to have an exclusively competitive battling population inside the S&M forum... but we don't even have 2% of the number of willing members needed to facilitate that sort of thing. We're not Smogon and we need to quit trying to be exactly like them.
You guys remember aragornbird, right? Well, he thoroughly enjoyed competitive battle but he didn't appear to have any problem helping out inexperienced players so long as they weren't incredibly rude. And he's on Smogon now. If you don't like helping inexperienced players then you should join him there.
And what about those casual players out there? I used to be one myself. Luckily I could post casual RMTs without being yelled at. If I were just getting situated into the competitve scene now, I'd have to go elsewhere.
**And what about Battle Frontier teams? Some of the buildings in the frontier require further coordination than even competitive battle does. And are you suggesting that I could glide through with 6, or in this case, 3 Plusle? I nearly ruined my keyboard after all of the water I just spit on it.
Considering the activity hovering around -273 degrees Celcius (harharhar) this rule is seriously tampering with the growth of the rating/battling population on our site.
→ Teams are REQUIRED to list EVs, Items, Natures, Ability (if it has more than one) and the obvious four moves
Wow. Wow. Well this would be pretty useful if PC were a competitive battle community but since we're not on Smogon we should stop acting like it.
→ Titles
→ Recommended Format
These are pretty essential suggestions. Good job friends.
→ Use the STICKIES to your ADVANTAGE
The stickies are pretty pointless and just reiterate the information that can be immediately found on Smogon. And do I really need to repeat myself again?
→ Use proper grammar and spelling
Good rule.
→ Formatting Issues
Terrible and subjective rule. Leaves room for blatant favoring of members and just adds to the endless list of things that members have to worry about before submitting their thread. And you know what's really ugly? A RMT that has no pictures and is written in the same exact font, color, and format throughout.
→ Learn to take criticism.
This rule is entirely pointless. If a criticism is truly helpful then a member will either accept it automatically or break an already established rule replying to it anyway. Adding unecessary rules really makes the rule thread tl;dr and repetitive.
→ "AH! WHERE IS MY THREAD!?" | Have some PATIENCE
This rule is god awful. There isn't enough activity to warrant thread approval, and there shouldn't be so many god forsaken rules that an open ended discussion forum like S&M should require thread approval. And Battle Logs certainly doesn't need it... do you see threads awaiting approval in the writing forums?
This just frustrates people and allows threads to sink to the second page before they are even approved. Not that the latter is important right now, considering the surge in activity going on.
→ Simplicity is key
Who made this rule? I mean I am pretty sure I know, and this is a rhetorical question, so don't answer, but it's just another pointless restriction. And once again, subjective. Please tell me in one sentence why CSS should be against the S&M rules.
Anyway that's my case, and before you reply just go look at the amazingly high number of posts that have occurred in S&M recently. Remember, there's no need for a second Smogon and there aren't enough active participants to create one.