i said that two of your comments were accusing me of being a "yes man" or "not stating original opinion" whilst that too be untrue, since yes i have agreed with bidoof and nakuzamiat on point or the other i have also provided with my own opinion, whilst you have done relatively not much, and are using my example while you are a prime example of that thing yourself.
especially since i couldn't talk back which was becoming quite apparent by that point, yet you were using examples of other players to show that how they aren't contributing much.
and that is surprising coming from you. Princess.
I will say that I did find one example of you stating something new and originally thought, (that one being the whole president theory) and if there are more please point them out, but I fail to see how you can use that on me. Yes, I haven't had too many posts, but out of all my posts
1) was agreeing with Nakizuma's logic and saying I had nothing to add. Also, it was to indicate who I was voting for
2) Was the whole Llama biting and me pointing out that the Llama bites weren't lethal.
3) was giving my thoughts and other suspicions I had more than for L'lbelle which was an answer to the comment made by the person in question earlier.
4) Gave you as an example (just cause you were one. I could have given someone else) and I also point out that you have given out some points. The two comments below are that are in question.
It was more or less what I saw rather than the peeps that got on you. Namely your defense, but that isn't as much of a detriment as others I've noticed.
For example:
ASD buddy always being a yes man and either repeating the same reasoning as others or doing simple reaction comments. I mean, buddy has given some talking points, but they've been more centered around agreeing with Nakuzima.
I'm also have an eye on Bidoof as well due to diverting from the llamas and all. I'm not saying it isn't justified, but at the same time it kinda seems off to divert away from the Llamas and go into a talk about how we don't know the roles out there. I mean, that's true, but why exactly talk about roles now when peeps are llamas? Also, it was potion left by Rabi at Nakuzima's doorstep I theorize what caused the Llama bit so it obviously isn't too malice.
1) I gave you credit for some talking points, just that your comments have been more centered around agreeing with Nakuzami.
2) I also point out Bidoof. You being under my suspicion doesn't mean you are my primary suspect.
Salzorrah has had the latest bite and while I don't think it is a lethal thing, there is the chance I'm wrong. I'm certain that it isn't enough of a reason for me to vote either. Personally, I'm a little suspicious of ASD for inactivity and not much of a new contribution or at least seeming to be more of an affirmer rather than actually making an analysis.
Also, I agree on L'Belle being suspicious as well as PurpleCicadia being off. I'm not certain on exactly who I'd lynch yet so it still up for deliberating.
This one only talked about a possible suspicion with you. I will admit I didn't see the President bit earlier. However, you have yet to actually prove the notion I haven't contributed when 3 out of my 4 comments brought up my suspicions and why I thought them as well as address my analysis on the Llama incident.
Good point, but that's still a claim. It would suck if we lost our magic mirror, but I don't think that's enough reason to not still suspect or treat at least with scrutiny.
Also, I think that those that are Llamas won't be able to vote so we have to be sure on this. For all we know all/none/or some of the mafia may be Llamas.
And this one here (while not mentioning you) does point out we should jump on the anti-mirror bandwagon without treating it with scrutiny and a talk on the mafia being potential llamas so we need to be sure.
I have class now so I won't be able to respond if you give more points, however I think I've pointed out the folly of your accusation (and while I give you credit on one of my assertions not being 100% correct as well as a guilty pleasure of enjoying your stylish vocab in your defense, though I will say it is quite odd for you to do that out of nowhere).
Also, notice how only one of us immediately lynched the other because he felt threatened. This isn't a reasonable approach. I would expect a defense/counter but giving me your point merely for being suspected only adds to it for me.
