Blah

Ah, I see. Then yes, it is possible. We just have to get fancy.:P Really fancy.

Well, each pokemon requires 80bytes of space (100 if you want HP and stats to stay too). If you use JPAN's save block hack, you may be able to free up enough ram to store these things. (If you cut the PC altogether and hijack that, then we could really do some damage.) Then, you could just copy things in and out using DMA (the thing that is supposed to protect the ram from hackers, but instead only helps us, by predictably moving things around) or memcopy SWI.

Yeah, I can get on. Just let me know when.

Yup.:P I just got word that one of them is releasing tonight and that the other is this coming Friday.^.^

I've gotten all of my base schools with good favor.:) Just waiting on the two toppers.

I know it gets old. I haven't even been able to play it for more than five minutes. DC will be completely different.

University? You mean those letters I'm waiting on?:P

This is a completely different thing. Completely. Well, almost. Essentially, it explains how the derpizards came to be and how they were dealt with. You are actually only a Derpizard for maybe 25% of the game.

Derpizard Contamination

Uhhh, I really want to work on DC, but I have no extra time.:( Jambo's inheritance was abanded due to bugs, but much of it is being salvaged.

Ahhh, probably.

I don't even know. It looks the same on my end.

It does....?

It was pyinstaller that was bugging out. On Linux, since the executables are different, it had issues freezing and gathering the right ones, more specifically the C based modules that form the base of graphics libraries. The dev version has fixes for this. However, I have encountered several errors where one coding practice works great on one platform, but causes overflow errors and other bad things on others. So, yeah.:P

Lol, so I finally got my program to compile on Linux:P I had to use a development version of pyinstaller because of a bug that drove me nuts.

When I mentioned calc, I was just saying I was good with math.:p Now I see what you are saying. I thought you just meant (essentially) plot the points on a graph and then raise the all points equally until the lowest is at 60.:p

Not really, grading on a curve means that you need to bring all grades below 60 up to at least 60, so there will be a proportion involved. The worse your grade, the more points you get back, meaning that a score of 10 will get +50 while a score of 90 will get +2. (I'm a calculus student in high school man, I've got this math stuff.:P) Obviously this won't look fair to the guy sitting on top, but it still gets the job done by essentially removing the fail range. So, your score, by proportion would probably get +10, bringing you into the C range, which is a lot better than the D range. If you grade linearly, then you are grading on a line. I have never seen a teacher grade on a line, it is always a quadratic or high function.

That is why you grade on a curve, not a line.:P There are ways of doing it where it is evenly distributed. In fact there are whole websites dedicated to curving formulas.

That is a terrible way of curving.... Jeez

Damn.:P Well, I guess that is a good thing? Lol

Lol, that is brilliant.:P