• Our software update is now concluded. You will need to reset your password to log in. In order to do this, you will have to click "Log in" in the top right corner and then "Forgot your password?".
  • Welcome to PokéCommunity! Register now and join one of the best fan communities on the 'net to talk Pokémon and more! We are not affiliated with The Pokémon Company or Nintendo.

Principal assualts student for wearing GSA t-shirt

Zet

7,690
Posts
16
Years
  • source

    MADISONVILLE, Tenn. – A 17-year-old senior at Sequoyah High School was reportedly shoved, bumped in the chest and verbally harassed by his principal last week for wearing a T-shirt in support of efforts to establish a gay-straight alliance (GSA) club on campus. In response, the American Civil Liberties Union and the ACLU of Tennessee sent a letter to the school district today demanding that students' rights to free speech be protected in the classroom.

    The ACLU has been assisting the student, Chris Sigler, in his and other students' efforts to overcome resistance from school officials to establish a GSA. Principal Maurice Moser had previously threatened to punish students who circulated petitions about the club.

    "It is totally unacceptable that a young man who was peacefully exercising his First Amendment rights would have his speech shut down by the public school principal," said Hedy Weinberg, executive director of the ACLU of Tennessee. "Last week's incident clearly illustrates the hostile environment LGBT students face at Sequoyah High School. Given this context, it's especially important that supportive voices like Sigler's can be heard in order to overcome the school's resistance to a GSA."

    Sigler wore a homemade T-shirt to school last Tuesday that said "GSA: We've Got Your Back." A teacher ordered Sigler to cover up the shirt in the future. Sigler, knowing he had a right to wear the shirt, wore it again Friday, and resisted an order to remove the shirt. Sigler says that Moser then ordered all students out of the classroom, except for Sigler's sister Jessica, who refused to leave. According to both students, Moser then grabbed Sigler's arm, shoved him, and chest-bumped him repeatedly while asking "Who's the big man now?" Sigler's mother reported that when she arrived at the school, she saw her son seated in a desk with Moser leaning over him and shouting in Sigler's face. The Siglers filed a report about the incident that afternoon with the Monroe County Sheriff's Department.

    "All I want is to have a GSA at my school to help stop the bullying against gays and lesbians and their friends who support them," Sigler said. "The shirt was a way to use my voice and show my support for the club. The way I was treated shows even more why we need a GSA here."

    "All students deserve a safe and respectful learning environment. Harassment, abuse or censorship of any student – regardless of sexual orientation – is absolutely reprehensible as well as illegal," said Amanda Goad, staff attorney with the ACLU Lesbian Gay Bisexual and Transgender Project. "We expect the police to investigate this quickly and fairly, and take statements from all witnesses who were present."

    The demand letter to the school district can be viewed here: www.aclu.org/free-speech-lgbt-rights/letter-director-monroe-county-schools

    The ACLU of Tennessee's associated alert can be viewed here: http://salsa.wiredforchange.com/o/6147/p/dia/action/public/?action_KEY=4824

    Correction: An earlier version of this press release indicated that the Siglers filed a report with the Madisonville Police Department. It has been corrected to reflect the correct agency, the Monroe County Sheriff's Department.
    Tennessee why are you such a bible-thumping state?

    Even though I am mortified at what happened, I really can't blame what happened considering it was in Tennessee, and it is such a gay-hating bible-thumping state. Though I honestly do hope that principal is removed from that school and replaced with someone who will allow that kid to wear the t-shirt(and of course allow a GSA club).
     

    FreakyLocz14

    Conservative Patriot
    3,498
    Posts
    14
    Years
    • Seen Aug 29, 2018
    The lawyer in me smells a surefire win for this kid.

    Really, they have no choice in the matter. T-shirts are a valid form of 1st Amendment expression, and forming a club is protected by the right to freedom of assembly (Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District, 393 U.S. 503). He can pursue relief under 42 U.S.C. section 2000(c).

    That principal should be sued for every penny he's worth.
     
    10,769
    Posts
    14
    Years
  • Tennessee
    Principal Maurice Moser had previously threatened to punish students who circulated petitions about the club.
    Moser then grabbed Sigler's arm, shoved him, and chest-bumped him repeatedly while asking "Who's the big man now?"
    This is the same state where the "Don't Say Gay" bill was proposed which would make teachers basically have to pretend that homosexuality doesn't exist up through the 8th grade. Clearly, this principal didn't feel like waiting around.

    It's scary that a grown adult would feel the need to do this to a student to satisfy his macho ego. I hope he's fired, but of course it's Tennessee so they'll probably give him a big pat on the back or something. Even if in this idiot's mind this was just a case of a student doing something he was told not to do it's totally inappropriate.
     

    Alex

    what will it be next?
    6,408
    Posts
    17
    Years
    • Seen Dec 30, 2022
    Well since it's gotten this much coverage, that principle will undoubtedly get fired and I suppose that's one less enemy (and a big one at that) for the hopefully upcoming GSA club at Sequoyah High.

    It's a shame that certain people still behave like this in the times we live in now.
     
    2,377
    Posts
    12
    Years
    • Seen Aug 25, 2015
    This is horrifying that an adult would harrass and harm a child like that just for expessing his right to free speech. Theres nothing wrong with him showing support for the club. I really hope the man is punished because this is very wrong.
     

    deoxys121

    White Kyurem Cometh
    1,254
    Posts
    13
    Years
  • That's terrible. Why on Earth would a principal of all people assault someone for wearing a GSA shirt? It's just pitiful, really. I hope that principal gets hit with the blunt end of the law, and gets fired.
     

    Mr. X

    It's... kinda effective?
    2,391
    Posts
    17
    Years
  • Should he decide to sue the school district over the assault, he will win easily.
     
    788
    Posts
    12
    Years
    • Seen Apr 16, 2012
    This kid has an EASY win. The man assaulted him, and simply for the fact that he wore a GSA shirt. Assault, Hate crime. That man is going down if he gets taken to trial. Since it's so popular, the boy will also have A LOT of support gunning for him, support that the principal won't have. I woud sue the man, and at least throw a lawsuit towards the school district as well, because there is a chance(nota very big, i would imagine) that they can get penned for some of the blame as well. If not, then it isn't a very big loss.

    The principal,he can hate gay all he wants. I could care less, in fact, it is in his right to hate whoever he chooses. Acting upon that hate, he can even do that to an extent. He can atted whatever anti-gay protests that he wants, he can campaign against gay rights al he wants. But when it comes to him attacking someone over those beliefs, that's when it crosses the line. Believe what you want, don't force your beliefs down others throat, don't take away the rights of others by FORCING them to operate in your beliefs. You know, what the US is doing now and pretty much has done through out all of history.


    If I was that kid, I'd have beat down that man the moment he laid a finger on me. It'd be all legal then, and no one could really say anything when I drop the man. I don't believe in violence, but I'm not afraid to tangle if somone's coming at me. He'd be with in his rights too if he did that. Not to mention that the bible-thumping princpal would probably think twice before he just walks up and knock someone around.

    Hopefully though, this kid sets an exampe for other kids and schools to folow. Not just for an anti-gay crime like this one, but for an anti-huamanty crime. It doesn't really matter if it is against a gay, straight, white, or black person, any way, it is just wrong.
     

    Sydian

    fake your death.
    33,379
    Posts
    16
    Years
  • GSA could have stood for Girls Stab Angels or Give Soldiers Apples for all he knew. But all joking aside, this kid has an easy win. I would be ashamed to teach at a school with such a terrible principal, or even attend it as a student for that matter.

    Hey, hey principal mentioned in this article, I'm talking to you. Way to act like the role model you're supposed to be for our generation. Times are changing, bruh bruh, get used to it. There's a part time spot open in my bakery if you're in dire need of a job. Love, Igiko.

    THE TIMES THEY ARE A-CHANGIN'
     
    Last edited:

    Chikara

    ʕ´•ᴥ•`ʔ
    8,284
    Posts
    19
    Years
  • I read the first line and got upset. But then again. Tennessee.

    Hey, hey principal mentioned in this article, I'm talking to you. Way to act like the role model you're supposed to be for our generation. Times are changing, bruh bruh, get used to it. There's a part time spot open in my bakery if you're in dire need of a job. Love, Igiko.
     
    1,796
    Posts
    13
    Years
  • Only in Tennessee.

    Anyhow, this is obviously disgusting and the principal, as well as the school should be beyond embarassed for this. Props to the kid for standing up for his rights and trying to get a GSA set up in his school, and as others have said, he will easily win if he decides to sue, either that or we get Scopes Trial v2!
     
    2,305
    Posts
    14
    Years
    • Seen Dec 16, 2022
    Wow, that guy is nuts. Plus, this is in the same state that treats gays like the spawn of you know who.

    Someone needs to kick some sense into Tennessee. Obviously, this needs to stop.
     
    746
    Posts
    16
    Years
  • Treating the principal like this is rude, especially when we're so defensive of our principles. I may disagree with his principles, but I will not tell him to change for principles of others.

    On the other hand, it was not right to assault the student. I understand his principles may oppose homosexuality, but it would have been best to let it go. Now his job is at stake for principles. Leave the principles at the doorstep, and express them in your private time.

    Fighting a senior authority at a school is not wise, even if it is in defense of oneself. Allow the legal system and the sympathies of the jury to punish the aggressor, instead of compromising innocence for the sake of impulsive revenge.

    I smell hypocrisy here, forcing Tennessee to bend to our principles. Perhaps we should have their principles projected upon us before we are such advocates. It sets both a good and a bad precedence, something that will not endear us to our brethren in Tennessee. Not to mention if they are truly so impassioned about their moral principles, they shall act in defiance of a law they view as unjust and forced upon them. We would not want our principles assaulted, we hold them just as dearly as this principal did. Strength in numbers, I suppose?
     
    Last edited:

    Dawn

    [span="font-size:180%;font-weight:900;color:#a568f
    4,594
    Posts
    15
    Years
  • I read the first paragraph of the quote and was all like...

    "Woah woah woah. You /do not have/ free speech in the class room. l2law"

    Mainly because it's freaking school. If we had free speech people would be able to talk incessantly during lectures and provoke arguments during class over whatever they're feeling passionate at the moment. They could literally hang out outside the window of a classroom and start torturing kids and disrupting class by doing the same thing. The notion that kids 'have' free speech in school is absurd. They never did and they never should. If one thinks otherwise, they need to go lobby for it.

    Regardless. Wearing a T-shirt with a message on it in a public school is probably something that should be protected by the law. Unless, y'know, you're pro-uniform. =| That being said, what the principal did was totally uncalled for. Like we needed to give people /more/ ammo to flame traditional/conservative/religious beliefs. It's not like anyone is at all hesitant to use said ammo when given it. <___>
     

    Mr. X

    It's... kinda effective?
    2,391
    Posts
    17
    Years
  • l2law 2 u 2 broski.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tinker_v._Des_Moines_Independent_Community_School_District

    If you don't feel like reading, i'll post the important part...

    "The Court found that the actions of the Tinkers in wearing armbands did not cause disruption and held that their activity represented constitutionally protected symbolic speech."

    Wearing clothing with a peaceful message is protected as it is, in this case, considered symbolic speech. (Know that saying a picture is worth a thousand words? Best saying I could think off.)

    Also Locz... I just ninja'd you. But, feel free to add additional information that I know I forgot about.

    Edit - Just for giggles, I googled the topic name (with the correct spelling for assault) and guess what? #5 on the list.
     
    Last edited:

    FreakyLocz14

    Conservative Patriot
    3,498
    Posts
    14
    Years
    • Seen Aug 29, 2018
    l2law 2 u 2 broski.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tinker_v._Des_Moines_Independent_Community_School_District

    If you don't feel like reading, i'll post the important part...

    "The Court found that the actions of the Tinkers in wearing armbands did not cause disruption and held that their activity represented constitutionally protected symbolic speech."

    Wearing clothing with a peaceful message is protected as it is, in this case, considered symbolic speech. (Know that saying a picture is worth a thousand words? Best saying I could think off.)

    Also Locz... I just ninja'd you. But, feel free to add additional information that I know I forgot about.

    Edit - Just for giggles, I googled the topic name (with the correct spelling for assault) and guess what? #5 on the list.

    Well, those who are interested can have a read of 42 U.S.C. section 1983.

    Section 1983 essentially makes equitable relief available to those whose constitutional rights had been violated by an actor acting under State authority.

    This student's 1st Amendment rights were violated by his principal. I'm assuming this is a public school. If so, that makes all the staff government employees. If it's a private school, he may be out of luck. Lots of private schools, especially religions ones, prohibit LGBT expressions on their campuses.

    Now that I thought about it more, I would probably proceed with this matter as a 1983 lawsuit instead of as a discrimination suit, since it is more of a free speech violation than the principle discriminating against him due to his actual or perceived sexual orientation. Monetary damages as well as an injunction demanding the allowance of a GSA to be formed would be the outcome.
     

    Demon.

    Dovie'andi se tovya sagain
    270
    Posts
    12
    Years
    • Seen Jun 20, 2018
    Not digging all the tennessee hate/stereotypes going on in here.
     

    FreakyLocz14

    Conservative Patriot
    3,498
    Posts
    14
    Years
    • Seen Aug 29, 2018
    Not digging all the tennessee hate/stereotypes going on in here.

    I agree. I know that there are plenty of decent people that live in TN and other states in the South. It's just unfortunate that the political climate there is less tolerant.
     
    746
    Posts
    16
    Years
  • I agree, disagreement is no grounds for attacks on people, let alone entire groups of people. Alas, how the winds of political taste go by!
     

    Dawn

    [span="font-size:180%;font-weight:900;color:#a568f
    4,594
    Posts
    15
    Years
  • l2law 2 u 2 broski

    ...

    So are you trying to imply that there's something wrong with my argument? Because as far as I can tell we are in agreement here other than whatever that piece I quoted is. <___>

    Perhaps you disagree with me when I pointed out how much it frustrated me that they were so vague as to imply that he "had freedom of speech" when in reality that implies a lot more than simply being able to wear T-shirts with messages on them?
     
    Back
    Top