Weavile05
Currently Hacking BW
- 1,431
- Posts
- 14
- Years
- North Carolina
- Seen Dec 5, 2011
there's less exp for each pokemon, possibly, but you're training half your team at once.
I'm not sure how I feel about 3 on 3 battles. I mean, I think it would be kool and everything, but wouldn't that mean less exp for each pokemon involved? Then again it could be so much fun I forget about that little detail.
or have a neutral, sorta uncaring opinion on this! :)I hope all the people who hated this become lovers :D
Yeah that's better than the haters :)or have a neutral, sorta uncaring opinion on this! :)
Yeah they will provide a faster way to level up your pokemon that is if it's against trainers and not wi-fi only...As they give your pokemon a 1:1 ratio of EXP :)Eh... Well, I'm not a big fan of stratagems, really. I'm more of a button masher -- kill it before it kills you, you could say. And triple battles come off as having a lot of strategics involved.
On the other hand, triple battles will offer a way to level up more Pokemon at once at a faster pace?
Though I have to admit, triple battles do look quite fun. I've tried my hand at competitive battling before but it still.... failed to hold my attention. I kinda think triple battles might do the trick this time. .....Maybe, idk.
We might be surrounded by triplets 0_0. Have you noticed how the twins are always little girls never boys or older girls and guys...To be honest, I wasn't a massive fan of this, and I'm still not 100% totally sure on it since I think it'll be way too cluttered, especially with larger Pokemon, but at least they're making it somewhat interesting with the attack positions and whatnot. I just hope 3v3 battles don't mean me being ganged up on by 3 kids, like double battles normally are like. Can't trainers just say "Hey, I fancy a 3v3 battle" instead?
You guys are all gonna bash this, then buy the game, then love the feature. I know it. It ALWAYS happens.Pokemon fans are especially whiny about everything.